Letter from a reader, sample complaint to the Illinois bar against Obama

Only sent to people with suits. If you want this posted tell me where and I will post it now. You can then tell your friends to go to that site.

If I do post it, I will tell you where.


Don Maccank


_______________________________________________________________


ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMPLAINT AGAINST BARACK OBAMA:

FILL OUT THE FORMAL COMPLAINT WITH YOUR INFORMATION
FILL OUT A COPY OF THE COVER SHEET
FAX A COPY TO CLERKS OFFICE BELOW AND SEND BY CERTIFIED MAIL
HE HAS 14 DAYS TO ANSWER-HE WILL GIVE UP HIS LICENSE AND NOT ANSWER
YOU HAVE STANDING BECAUSE HE CAME INTO YOUR STATE AND SWORE TO YOUR SOS THAT HE WAS A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN
I'LL BET YOU EVEN DONATED $20 TO HIS ELECTION FUND WITH A DEBIT CARD YOU COULD ADD THAT IN AT THE END OF #12 …and that I was defrauded and encouraged to donate even more subsatnatial sums of money to his campaign.




https://www.iardc.org/htr_reqforinvestig_form.html

https://www.iardc.org/co_clerksofcsvc.html#1

Illinois attorney board for complaints



https://www.iardc.org/ardcroll.asp

Obama law license



http://www.clr.org/cjg.html

example of Ilinois complaint



http://www.iardc.org/rulesSCT.html

rules governing legal profession in Ilinois

http://www.state.il.us/court/supremecourt/rules/art_viii/

RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT



The Clerk's Office is located in the Commission's Chicago office at 130 East Randolph Drive, Suite 1100. The Clerk's office open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., on all days except Saturday, Sunday and Commission holidays. You may contact the Clerk's Office by telephone at the Commission's general phone number (312) 565-2600, or within Illinois, at 800-826-8625. The Clerk's Office facsimile number is (312) 565-1806.

_____________________________________________________________________________BEFORE THE HEARING BOARD

OF THE

ILLINOIS ATTORNEY REGISTRATION

AND

DISIPLINARY COMMISSION



xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Petitioner Case No. To Be Assigned

vs (See Note 1 and 2)



Barack Hussein Obama

Attorney Respondent.



,

FORMAL COMPLAINT



XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Petitioner, upon information and belief, states the following:

COUNT ONE



1. Respondent, Barack Hussein Obama, claims to be licensed to practice law in Illinois in 2008, and by virtue of alleged license is a member of the State Bar of Illinois who is subject to the jurisdiction of the Illinois Supreme Court and the Attorney Registration and Disiplinary Commission in matters of discipline for professional misconduct.



2. Respondent last maintained an office for the practice of law in the County of Cook, Illinois State.



3. As an attorney subject to the rules and regulations of the Illinois Supreme Court, respondent is subject to the standards for discipline set forth in Article Vlll of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct.



4. As attorney subject to the rules and regulations of the Illinois Supreme Court, respondent is charged, with the following duties and responsibilities:

a. To refrain from engaging in conduct prejudicial to the proper administration of justice;

b. To refrain from engaging in conduct contrary to justice, ethics, honesty, or good morals;

c. To refrain from engaging in conduct that subjects the legal profession to obloquy, contempt, censure, or reproach.



COUNT ONE



5. On or about December 17, 1991, Barack Hussein Obama was admitted to practice law in the State of Illinois. On his Bar Admission Application he stated that he was born in Hawaii when in fact he was born in Kenya, Africa. At no time has Barack Husseim Obama attempt to correct his mistakes or to inform the Commission or Courts of his dishonesty.





6. By reason of the conduct outlined above, Respondent has engaged in the following misconduct:

a. conduct that violated Rule 8.1 (a)(1 and (2) Bar Admissiom and Disciplinary Matters of the Rules of Professional Conduct;and



b. conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice in violation of Rule 8.4(a)(5) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct; and



c. conduct which tends to defeat the administration of justice, or to bring the courts or legal profession into disrepute, in violation of Supreme Court Rule 771: and



d. Including, but not limited to, these laws including Obstruction of Justice, RICO, racketeering laws, laws against filing false information in the public records, laws against fraud upon the Court, negligence, and The Penal Code making it a felony for a public official (officer of the Court)to violate offenses at common law ie. Obstruction of Justice (Blackstones , Commentaries(1890),pp(161-177):

1. Perjury

2. Barretry





COUNT TWO



8. Petitioner re-alleges, as if recited verbatim, the factual statements set forth in Count One of this Complaint.



9. On or about December 17, 1991, Barack Hussein Obama was admitted to practice law in the State of Illinois. On his Bar Admission Application he did not declare that he was also known as A/K/A: Barry Soetoro; Barry Obama; Barack Dunham; and Barry Dunham. At no time has Barack Husseim Obama attempt to correct his mistakes or to inform the Commission or Courts of his dishonesty. Furthermore, these A/K/A names were used on passports and college applications to receive foreign student aid.



10. By reason of the conduct outlined above, Respondent has engaged in the following misconduct:

a. conduct that violated Rule 8.1 (a)(1 and (2) Bar Admissiom and Disciplinary Matters of the Rules of Professional Conduct;and



b. conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice in violation of Rule 8.4(a)(5) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct; and



c. conduct which tends to defeat the administration of justice, or to bring the courts or legal profession into disrepute, in violation of Supreme Court Rule 771: and



d. Including, but not limited to, these laws including Obstruction of Justice, RICO, racketeering laws, laws against filing false information in the public records, laws against fraud upon the Court, negligence, and The Penal Code making it a felony for a public official (officer of the Court)to violate offenses at common law ie. Obstruction of Justice (Blackstones , Commentaries(1890),pp(161-177):

1. Perjury

2. Barretry



COUNT THREE



11. Petitioner re-alleges, as if recited verbatim, the factual statements set forth in Count One and Two of this complaint.



12. During 2008, Barack Hussein Obama declared to 50 Secretary of States , including Illinois, that he was eligible to run for the office of the Presidency of the United States and was a "natural born citizen" even though it was common knowledge that his father was a Kenyan citizen.

Barack Obamas 2008 Presidential website clearly states that he had dual citizenship and his father was a Kenyan/British citizen. This is a violation of the US Constitution Article ll, Section l, Clause 5.



13. By reason of the conduct outlined above, Respondent has engaged in the following misconduct:



a. conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice in violation of Rule 8.4(a)(5) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct; and



b. conduct which tends to defeat the administration of justice, or to bring the courts or legal profession into disrepute, in violation of Supreme Court Rule 771: and



c. Including, but not limited to, these laws including Obstruction of Justice, RICO, racketeering laws, laws against filing false information in the public records, laws against fraud upon the Court, negligence, and The Penal Code making it a felony for a public official (officer of the Court)to violate offenses at common law ie. Obstruction of Justice (Blackstones , Commentaries(1890),pp(161-177):

1. Perjury

2. Barretry



COUNT FOUR



15. Petitioner re-alleges, as if recited verbatim, the factual statements set forth in Count One through Three of this complaint.



16. That these representations made by Respondent were false, and were known to Respondent to be false at the time they were made. "Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional Right from liability. For they are deemed to know the law." Owen v Independence 100 S.C.T. 1398



17. That Respondent acting in concert with other state actors, by slander, impersonating a state official, bias, intimidation, fraud, mail fraud, unauthorized practice of law, have violated Petitioner's Constitutional Rights, as well Unfair Trade Practice Laws and the Consumer Protection Act Laws and barratry.



PRAYER FOR RELIEF

18. A Temporary Restraining Order restraining Respondent from exercising any duties of any state or federal office held, or the practice of law, pending disposition of this Petition.



19. That Respondent be denied any and all emoluments he may have been entitled to.



20. That the Respondent be declared in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. {{} {} 2382, and 2384 and the 14th Amendment, {}3 of the Constitution of the United States of America.



21. All other relief that Petitioner is entitled to pursuant to F.R.C.P. 54(c)



22. Any and all other relief that the Court deems equitable and just in the interest of justice.



23. Whoever, having taken an Oath before a competent tribunal officer or person in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an Oath to be administered, wilfully and contrary to such Oath, states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true, is guilty of perjury and shall be fined no more than $2,000.00 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.





Wherefore, Respondent should be subjected to such discipline as may be warranted by the facts and circumstance of such misconduct.







Dated December 19, 2008

Anywhere, USA xxxxx









XXXXXXXXXXXX

c/o 123 Oak St

Anywhere, USA

XXXXX



COMPLAINT

Note 1

Lawyers and judges are required to file a request for investigation if they have knowledge of "A significant violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to (a) Lawyer's honesty, trust, worthiness, or fitness as a lawyer ..."



COMPLAINT

Note 2

There is no statute of limitation or any concept of latches as a bar to prosecution. ABA Standards for Lawyer Discipline and Disability Proceedings Standard 4.6(1979) states that "Lawyer discipline and disability proceedings should not be subject to any statute of limitations." In Re Smith, 73 Kan 743; Anne Arundel Cty Bar Ass'n v Collins 272 MD 578; State Ex Rel Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v Bates 162 Neb 652 and in Re O'Hara, 63 AD 2nd 500 (1978).





COVER SHEET FOR FORMAL COMPLAINT

IN THE DETAILS AREA SAY "SEE ATTACHED" OR N/A
STREET ADDRESS, COOK COUNTY, IL
Filing a Request for an Investigation of an Attorney | Effect on Your Legal Rights | Other Information Provided by the ARDC

REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION OF A LAWYER FORM

Request an investigation of an Illinois lawyer by printing, completing and returning this form to the Chicago or Springfield ARDC offices. The Chicago office is located at 130 East Randolph Drive, Suite 1500, 60601-6219. The Springfield office is located at the One North Old Capitol Plaza, Suite 333, 62701-1625.

1. Your name: ____________________________________________

Street Address: ____________________________________________

City: _____________________ State: _____ Zip: ________________

Home Phone Number: ________________________________

Cell Phone Number: __________________________________

Business Phone Number: _______________________________

2. Name of Lawyer you are complaining about: __________________________________

Name of Law Firm: _____________________________________________________

Street Address: ________________________________________________________

City: ____________________ State: _____ Zip: ___________________

Phone Number: _______________________________

3. Did you employ the lawyer?

Yes _____

If yes, when was the lawyer hired? ______________________

How much did you pay for the lawyer? ___________________

No _____

If no, what is your connection to the lawyer? _________________________

4. If your complaint relates to a lawsuit, please give the following:

Name of court (for example: Circuit Court of Cook County): ________________________________________________________________

Name of case: _____________________________________________________

Case number: ______________________________________________________

5. Please describe what the lawyer did or failed to do that you believe may have been improper. If you employed the lawyer, explain what you employed the lawyer to do. Include important dates and names, addresses and telephone numbers of witnesses and other people involved. Do not include opinions or arguments. Attach copies of any documents that support your complaint, such as fee agreements, receipts, checks, letters and court papers._____________________

Date: ____________________ Signature: __________________________________________

Soetoro Divorce papers

Dr. Taitz,

In case you haven’t seen this, some Soetero Divorce papers were posted at this link (it’s pdf so you’ll have to download it). May the Lord bless you for all your work.

http://www.therightsideoflifeDr. Taitz,

In case you haven’t seen this, some Soetero Divorce papers were posted at this link (it’s pdf so you’ll have to download it). May the Lord bless you for all your work.

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=2043 .com/?p=2043

No verification of legal name- Immediate subpoenas needed

Please write open letters to US attorney for Northern Illinois Patrick Fitzgerald, US att Mike Mukasey, director of FBI Robert Muller, + 9 Supremes+50 Att. Gen-s+ 455 Congressmen+100 Senators. Record your open letters on video and forward the letters and video.
We, the people demand to know immediately, what is Obama's legal name and any and all names and alieses. Is it Barry Soetoro, Barry Sutoro, Barry Toot, Barack Obama, Barack Hussein Obama? We demand to know any and all citizenships under all of these names, any and all criminal records under these names. We demand immediate subpoenas issued by the US att. office and offices of all the att.gen-ls for production of original BC+ any and all passports+ immigration and travel records+ school and university records
Sincerely
Orly Taitz



Dr Orly,

Please establish "reasonable doubt" to allow access to Obama's records with the following documents:

NEW -- Important -- please look at the index of the Ann Dunham's dissertation, "Peasant Blacksmithing in Indonesia", written in 1992, with references back to 1978.

http://rapidshare.com/files/174916246/Peasant_Blacksmithing_in_Indonesia_-_excerpts.pdf

Of significant IMPORTANCE is that she spells her last name "Sutoro" consistently in her OWN dissertation -- well-vetted by University staff and taking YEARS to write. Yet in her divorce decree that she kept going for 8 years, 1980 to 1988, Stanley Ann, Lolo and Maya (and presumably Barry) used an incorrectly spelled last name, "Soetoro." She should have had a driver's license to open the case and prove who she was.

I think this might give you "justifiable cause" in your investigations with the mother not correctly reporting last names and potentially confusing birth records, too.

Questions of aliases not disclosed, plus names not legally changed, could cause problems on Jan 8, 2009, when the EC votes are counted by Congress, and Jan 20, when Barack Obama is sworn in by his legal name by the Supreme Court Chief Justice...

Also, if you look at Debbie Schlussel's website talking about Barack Obama Jr's Selective Service application, http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/11/exclusive_did_n.html, the postage date on the Selective Service application is July 29, 1980. BUT note that the trial start date for the divorce isn't until Aug 20, 1980, at the earliest. Wrong name, and or fraud?

The divorce papers Dr. Orly referenced in a recent video for "Stanley Ann Soetoro" are on Berg's website: http://www.obamacrimes.info/justthefacts.html. There are possibly 7 documents from there you may not have. Please check for the new affidavits and other paperwork, like this (http://www.obamacrimes.info/SOETORO%20DIVORCE%20P%201-5.pdf) and (http://www.obamacrimes.info/057_7%20Affidavit%20of%20Reverend%20Kweli%20Shuhubia.pdf)

Also, this is a VERY recent article on Ann Dunham while she was in Indonenia and Pakistan, is written by her college professor an friend, Alice Dewey. "Ann Dunham -- a Personal Reflection" -- note that is subpoenas as in order, Mrs Dewey has noted on many occasions publicly she has a trove of letters from Ann Dunham and Barry Soetoro while they were overseas. http://www.anthrosource.net/na102/home/ACS/publisher/aaa/journals/production/an/2008/49/8/an.2008.49.8.20/an.2008.49.8.20.fp.png

Lastly, I leave you with one tidbit I gleaned from the divorce papers:
Case 1D00-0-17619 (117619) (Initiator ID: A1530) — Stanley Ann Soeroto vs Lolo Soetoro Divorce Ct — Initiation date: 08-20-1980 Case terminated 11-26-1988 — Attorney William H. Gilardy Jr

The attorney for Stanley Ann's divorce in 1980, "Gilardy H William Jr," went on to become Hawaii DNC state attorney, as said in this 1998 article: "High court asked to act in vote dispute" - http://archives.starbulletin.com/98/12/29/news/story3.html

Ironically, in 2006, William Gilardy is listed by name here "Who's Undoing the U.S. Constitution?" www.middleeast.org/forum/fb-public/1/4604.shtml

He's still a Lawyer, still in Hawaii: "Gilardy William H, Esq" in Honolulu, (808) 237-4100.

Restated: The attorney that helps Obama's mother get a divorce in 1980, goes on to be the DNC state attorney by 1998, listed in "Who's Undoing the U.S. Constitution?" in 2006, and is today an Esquire in Hawaii. What are the odds of that???

If I can help you further, please drop me a line anytime

Thank you, BB

5294 visited our blog yesterday, that's the rate of about 160,000 per month

I believe the radio programs and new you-tube videos have added the number of readers and visitors.
On Wednesday I spoke on 5 radio stations
WASB New York
WRSB New York
Mike Minokian - Florida
Tracy and Jeff -No Compromise WA state
Captain America- transmitting around numerous military bases all over the country
I just recorded Greg Jackson show, it will be transmitted 8-10 PM on Sunday on KBAR in CA

Great idea from Unalienable Rights, call federal newsRadio, demand immediate vetting of Obama

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

HI,
There's a radio station in Wa. D.C. called FederalNewRadio which I believe needs to be plagued with tons of emails to get the Obama story spread around the Wa. D.C. area. You can kisten to this radio station LIVE off of the internet.

http://www.federalnewsradio.com/

This radio station is now conducting ineterviews with individuals charged with making federal job appointments and who are required to vett ALL new employees who are being consdered for jobs

This radio station interviews many govlernment employee unions and government agencies personnel.

The attorneys who are filing lawsuits need to have exposure on this radio station, imo.

AFGE "American Federation of Government Employees" needs to begin pursuing the vetting of Obama as the transition team in Wa. D.C. is now accomplishing with the hiring of new employees who are being looked at for employment in the Oblammma admin.

The NEW employees are said to have to answer apx 65 questions and then become security cleared to hold a government job.

http://www.afge.org/index.cfm?page=PressReleases&PressReleaseID=918

My Message to MSM- I told you so

Recently numerous members of MSM voiced their dissatisfaction with Obama: Keith Olbertman, Rachel Madden and others. Sorry to say guys, but I told you so.
Numerous groups have blindly supported Obama, while I was telling you all along: "You are foolishly expecting more freedoms, but you will get less" This man has no track record, everything about his past is sealed, hidden, distorted and manipulated. LGBT community is upset today and felt it was thrown under the buss. I guarantee you soon enough Jewish community and all the other supporters will feel the same. I was telling you: "you can't pay attention or give any credence to flowery speeches given at the AIPAC convention, because equally flowery speeches were given to the PLO (the speeches, that were sealed and hidden by LA Times).
Let me remind you a few lessons from history. Who led the 1979 revolution in Iran? Students and intellectuals, seeking change and more freedoms. What did they get? Ayatollah Khomeini and Mahmud Ahmadinejad.(enough said) Who led the communist revolution in Russia, November 7, 1917? Students and intellectuals, seeking change and freedoms. What did they get? Stalin and Gulag.(enough said)
That is why I am saying, all of us, Right Left and Center need to join in one endeavor, one stride: demand to see this man's past, demand to see his original birth certificate that is sealed in HI, that should say the name of the hospital and the name of the doctor, so we can see if he really was born in this country. We need to demand his immediate production of documents or consent for production of his passports, immigration records and university enrollment records: so we can ascertain, what citizenship does he have? Is it American or Indonesian, Kenyan or British? All of you should demand those records on the air immediately, we can clear up this controversy in one day, once and for all.

When there is no real transparency, honesty or integrity, sooner or later every one ends up under the buss, a sacrificial lamb at the altar of one man's overinflated ego and unyielding desire for grip on power.
Orly Taitz

An open letter to Senator Levin

Dear Senator Levin,

Your letter to your constitutent in Washington State is in error with respect to the natural born status of Barack Hussein Obama.

Amendment 14 states in its first paragraph:

1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
Posted on Obama's website is this admission:

When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.



What could be clearer than that statement from Obama's own website?

You should also note that nowhere in Amendment 14 do the words "natural born" appear. The Amendment is very careful to stay away from the term "natural born" as any change to Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution requires an Amendment to the Constitution which has been rejected many times.

The meaning of "natural born" is very clearly defined in the wording of Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution and also by The Honorable John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court in his letter to General George Washington on 25 July, 1787 suggesting the clause:

"Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government ; and to declare expressly that the command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen."
The statement, "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was previously written as, "of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty..." Both mean the same thing.

I would hope sir that you will study the issue carefully and make a correction to your constituent.

In addition, on January 8, 2009 when Congress meets to validate the vote of the Electorial College, I would hope you would rise and in unison with other Congressmen (meaning Senators as well) request that Vice President Cheney suspend the vote pending a full and complete hearing as to the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to be President of the United States.

Barack Hussein Obama does not meet the requirements to be President of the United States as defined in Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution!

Signed, Starbeau

Posted by Robert Stevens for Starbeau

America Already Knows Summary Flyer: Battle Rages Across America!

America Must Know: "Want to spread the news?

Click here to download the latest summary, print it out, and pass it out!"

Do not leave Americans with silence « td blog

Do not leave Americans with silence « td blog: "By Dr. Kate, an Exclusive for the TD Blog

TD Foreword: Dr. Kate shared with me this letter that she recently sent to Chief Justice John G. Roberts of the U.S. Supreme Court, and I asked her if I could publish it. Regular readers know that I am not optimistic that the Court will have the courage to get involved in clarifying Article II’s natural-born citizen clause in the context of Obama’s eligibility, although I believe that they should. However, I will continue to publish intelligent commentaries on the question of Obama’s eligibility, and Dr. Kate is one of the wisest contributors on the subject I’ve come across. She, as well as Judah Benjamin, will always have a home here on this blog so long as it exists.

I want to thank Dr. Kate for her patriotism, perseverance, and time-consuming research." Read more.

You Know There's A Problem When MSNBC Attacks No-Record Obama

YouTube - You Know There's A Problem When MSNBC Attacks No-Record Obama

Pravda weighs in again

Once again, Pravda has published a far more insightful and thoughtful piece on the Obama Eligibility Controversy than any Western media source. Interesting.

Robert Stevens

Who lost their seats?

Some have suggested that contacting those members of both houses of Congress that lost their seats in the last election would be useful. These failed incumbents have nothing to risk, and can direct public attention to the Obama Eligibility Controversy. A list can be found here.

Robert Stevens

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.'s Ties To The Annenberg Foundation

A Conversation with Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. on the Origin, Nature, and Importance of the Supreme Court

The establishment of a federal judiciary was a top priority for this nation's founding fathers. In December 2006, Chief Justice of the United States John G. Roberts, Jr. and a group of high school students participated in a conversation about the high court - from its history and evolution to the methods Justices use in selecting and hearing cases to the role of an independent judiciary and other issues crucial to a healthy democracy today. (Length: 37 minutes) Read more.

More signs the "Obama Coalition" is fraying

First it was Muslims in Pakistan and other places a bit nervous about Obama's repeatedly stated plans to unilaterally attack the Waziristan region of Pakistan. Then it was antiwar activist and left wing stalwart, Noam Chomsky being cheered when he called Obama's lack of transparency and bellicose stance into question. Now it is discomfort with Obama's choice of anti-gay rights evangelist Rick Warren to deliver the invocation at the inauguration.

Well, don't say I didn't warn you. I have been telling everyone who would listen that there have been danger signals for well over 12 months. I was repeatedly and brutally castigated for not "drinking the purple koolaid" with everyone else. How does your "Messiah" look now?

Robert Stevens

AOL Survey Shows People are Concerned

According to an informal AOL Survey, of more than 88,000 respondents so far nationwide, only 42 percent believe that there is no merit to this Eligibility Controversy. In all but 7 US states and the District of Columbia, most citizens feel that there are unanswered questions about Obama's eligibility.

The Electoral College voted on December 15, 2008, and now the votes are being tabulated in each state. Soon these votes will be sent to the National Archives. On January 8, 2009, the new Congress will convene to consider results of the Electoral College vote. Congress is constitutionally required to discuss the validity of these votes and address any eligibility questions at this meeting.

U.S. legislators take an oath to defend the US Constitution. Given the growing concern of the public with the Eligibility Controversy, every House member and Senator should be prepared to raise their voices in support of the interests of their constituents. Our elected members of the House and Senate should live up to their oaths. They must live up to their oaths. They must listen to the people.

If House members and Senators disregard the oaths they took, they will have trouble in the next election. If House members and Senators ignore the will of the large segment of people concerned with Obama's eligibility when the House and the Senate convene on January 8, 2009, the citizens will pass judgement in the next election. With Congressional job approval ratings at historic lows, can any members of Congress afford to have a cavalier attitude about this vital question?

Make sure you contact the Senators and Congressmen, and let them know that you are concerned! This is of the utmost importance.

Robert Stevens

Addendum: Who is on the Fringe Now?

With only 42 percent of those responding to the AOL poll unconcerned about eligibility, and more than half of those surveyed believing there is a question about Obama's elibility, it is a bit tough to say that the Eligibility Controversy is just a "fringe issue". In fact, it appears that those who believe that Obama is eligible, no matter what the evidence suggests, are more accurately described as belonging to a "crazy fringe" group.

Motion for Subpoenes for Obama BC issued in WA state, case to be heard by the full court. BO announces vacation in HI

Flag this messagePLease read: Subpoena just requested by Broe v Reed: Obama just announced he is gonna vacation in Hawaii - You better get someone to watch himThursday, December 18, 2008 8:58 AM
From: "Don Villars-110807" Add sender to Contacts To: dr_taitz@yahoo.com, philjberg@obamacrimes.comNames and Designation of Persons Filing Motion

COMES NOW, James E. Broe, Kenneth R. Seal, Robert Baker, Mark Sussman, Stan Walter, Bill Wise, Andy Stevens, Ed Crawford, Jason Lagen, Louise Workman, Jocelyn Murcelli, Mike Murcelli and Kevin McDowell, by and through counsel of record Stephen Pidgeon, pursuant to RAP 17.3(a), the Rules of Discovery, CR 26-37, and CR 45 governing the issuance of subpoenas, and Move this Honorable Court for an order allowing the issuance of two subpoenas for the purpose of obtaining admissible evidence in this case, and expediting discovery pursuant to the proposed schedule.

Relief Requested

Plaintiffs seek an Order allowing plaintiffs expedited discovery by means of two subpoenas, one to be served on the Secretary of State of the State of Washington, to discover the following items: I) the Declaration of Candidacy of Barack Obama as filed in the State of Washington; 2) all records concerning the candidacy and disallowance of Socialist Worker’s Party candidate Frank Colero within the Secretary of State’s office; and one to be served upon the Director of the Department of Health in the State of Hawaii, to discover the following items: 3) the Birth Certificate of Barack Obama in Hawaii, and 4) all supporting documentation regarding the registration of the birth of Barack Obama in Hawaii. Plaintiffs seek an order which establishes the following schedule.Read more »[/quote]

Hawaii??

1. Plaintiffs are to serve the State of Hawaii Department of Health with a Subpoena in the form attached hereto as approved by the Court no later than the close of business on Monday, December 22, 2008, and responses shall be served upon Plaintiffs’ ‘counsel. no later than the close of business on December 28, 2008.


OK THIS IS WHERE IT GETS FUUUNNNY:

OBAMA HAS ANNOUNCED PLANS TO VACATION IN HAWAII !!

Obama's phone number is linked to the Headquarters for the Socialism and Liberation Party

Source: Texas Darlin blog site, Dec 17th, 2008
Link: http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/google-obamas-residence-linked-to-psl-phone-number/


Jeez, - ... something else appears as a bit odd ... Does it cause Fitzgerald even more interest in Greenwood Ave???


Please post this, pass it on to many other folks, blogs, media, etc., - ... and ask them to pass it on to many others too!


Google: Obama’s Residence Linked to PSL Phone Number
December 17, 2008 by texasdarlin
© 2008 TexasDarlin/TD Blog (If you wish to use my screenshots, you must provide a link back to this blog and credit this blog as the source).
This is curious and bizarre. A reader, Jane, conducted some Google searches related to the Obamas’ Chicago home on Greenwood Avenue, and discovered the following, which I verified with my own searches, and documented with screenshots at approximately 2:30 PM ET on 12/17/08:

A Google search of the Obamas’ address, 5046 Greenwood Ave., Chicago, yields this:


Greenwood Ave. Search 12/17/08

The phone number listed for the address, if you can’t make it out, is 415-821-6171, a San Francisco area code. When I Google’d that phone number, this came up:


Greenwood Phone Search 12/17/08

The phone number associated with the Obama’s mansion is the number for the national Party of Socialism and Liberation. When I clicked on that link, I got this:


PSL Home Page 12/17/08

And a tab for local offices on the PSL site shows this:


PSL Local Offices Page 12/17/08

Why on Earth is the phone number for the Party for Socialism and Liberation linked to the Obamas’ private residence in Chicago?

Theories?

Currently the Blog is visited at a rate of 3,500 per day, over 100,000 per month

I believe the snowballing rate of visits shows that people are hungry for truth, sick of mass media lies and are ready for action in removing the usurper and prosecuting everyone that is aiding and abeting this colossal fraud

Jan 8 Congressional vote on electoral college

Thursday, December 18, 2008 1:42 AM
From: "redacted>View contact details To: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

THEY DO MEET ON JAN. 8 2009

U. S. Electoral College
Public Law 110-430 changed the date of the electoral vote in Congress in 2009 from January 6 to January 8. This date change is effective only for the 2008 presidential election.

Thank You for ALL YOU DO!!!!



____________________________________________________________

Another idea from a reader

Thursday, December 18, 2008 4:42 AM
From: This sender is DomainKeys verified "Hanen" >View contact details To: dr_taitz@yahoo.comEASY WAY TO MAKE SURE OBAMA NEVER GETS INAUGURATED (READ CAREFULLY):–

Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II “natural born citizen” based on the Kenyan/British citizenship of Barack Obama’s father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a “citizen” born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States” as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II “natural born citizen”.

Here is another one that doesn't get it

Does anybody want to write to Senator Levin? How hard it is to understand that HI allow it's residents to obtain HI Birth certificate for their children born abroad and they allow birth certificates to be obtained based on a statement of one relative only. I swear after Kyl basing his knowledge on snopes and Martines saying that "it was vetted by voters that were not allowed access to the original BC" and now this one, I wonder if the collective IQ of our 100 Senators would amount to a 100??? What do you think?
Orly
PS Joan, your e-mail box didn't work, e-mail cam back
Thursday, December 18, 2008 3:58 AM
From: "Orly Taitz" View contact details To: "Joan" Joan,will you be willing to send an open letter and explain to Sen Levin the problem with Hi BC? Ask him to write a demand for formal investigation and subpoena of the original BC and other docs. Please forward a demand for indictment to him and all the att. general and US att. Patrick Fitzgerald. I will post your open letter. You can also put it on video, I will post it on you-tube channel that we are preparing: Dr. Orly Taitz presents

Orly Taitz DDS Esq

26302 La Paz ste 211
Mission Viejo Ca 92691

29839 S. Margarita Pkwy
Rancho Santa Margarita Ca 92688

ph. w 949-586-8110 c-949-683-5411
fax 949-586-2082

--- On Thu, 12/18/08, Joan Kessler wrote:

From: Joan Subject: FW: Your Concerns
To: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
Date: Thursday, December 18, 2008, 3:51 AM

Dr. Taitz,

I am just a citizen, not a lawyer, but I wanted you to see this that I received from my senator in Michigan when I sent him my concern a few weeks ago.

Joan

Grand Haven, MI



From: senator_levin@levin.senate.gov [mailto:senator_levin@levin.senate.gov]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 12:53 PM
To: (name redacted)
Subject: Re: Your Concerns



Dear Ms. (redacted):


Thank you for contacting me regarding the false rumors surrounding President-elect Obama’s citizenship status. I appreciate you sharing your thoughts with me.

As you may know, Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution states that, “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.”

President-elect Obama was born in Hawaii as documented by his official birth certificate. He is, therefore, a natural born citizen of the United States. Thank you again for writing.


Sincerely,
Carl Levin

Please forward to me the written objections to Obama presidency from Congr. Linder and other congr. and senators

Please forward to me written objections to Obama presidency from US Congressmen and Senators. I understand that Congressman Linder is the first one.

Please forward to me your videos, u-tube links and letters demanding att. generals and us attorneys to indict Obama for fraud and investigate expert reports in regards to his forged documents
Here is a letter from a reader

Dear Brilliant American Patriots;



http://www.newsonsofliberty.us/

In this article it tells that nowhere is it specified that one particular entity is responsible for vetting the presidential candidates. "They" just ASS-U-ME that the DNC or the RNC or whoever will check their own candidates background.

The other day I read an article that stated the phrase that says something to the effect of, "If the responsibility is not granted to the federal government by the Constitution and it is not granted to the states by the Constitution then those rights fall to the people." (Sorry, I can't find the article again.)

If there is not anything written specifically stating that a certain entity has the obligation to vet the presidential candidates than the job automatically falls to the people.

It is only my little mind that loves to believe in miracles but it just seems to me that the courts cannot claim "Standing" or anything else if any American citizen wants to see the candidate's proof of qualifications.

I realize that I do not have the exact quote but could someone please tell me WHY my logic isn't good enough to find out Obama's qualifications?

Along with that, is the following article that Andy sent around what we are going to try to do with Congress? I'm trying to keep up but you guys move rapidly.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Stang/alan178.htm
Dr. Edwin Vieira has four degrees from Harvard University, but he has overcome this handicap and can speak intelligible English. Among many other accomplishments, Dr. Vieira is the author of the masterful Pieces of Eight, the definitive monetary history of the United States, which in the present financial debacle is more relevant than ever. I strongly recommend you read it.
Dr. Vieira is a consummate constitutional authority. He says that if just one member of the House and one member of the Senate were to challenge Hussein's eligibility to serve as President in writing when the Electoral College's votes arrive in the Senate, the Congress would have to conduct a full investigation, complete with witnesses, testimony and documents. Dr. Vieira urges you to get in touch with your Congressmen and Senators for the purpose.
Remember, you are not asking them to deny the presidency to Hussein. You are merely asking them to require him to prove his eligibility. This should be very easy to do for lame ducks like Tar Heel Elizabeth Dole, for instance, who has nothing political to lose and therefore nothing to fear. On her way out, lame ducks like her could have the last laugh by performing this historic service to the Constitution.
Just li'le ol' me,
Karen

Express your disapproval of John Kyl

I am saddened to realize that a sitting US Senator claimed in a letter to a constituent that essentially, Barack Obama is eligible to be president of the United States of America because of the careful analysis of Snopes.com. What has this country come to?

I suggest you express your concern with this lack of analysis, careful thought and proper respect for logic, reason and the rule of law by contacting the Honorable John Kyl at his offices:

PHOENIX OFFICE
2200 East Camelback, Suite 120
Phoenix, Arizona 85016-3455
Phone: (602) 840-1891
Fax: (602) 957-6838

TUCSON OFFICE
6840 North Oracle Road, Suite 150
Tucson, Arizona 85704
Phone: (520) 575-8633
Fax: (520) 797-3232

WASHINGTON, D.C. OFFICE
730 Hart Senate Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Phone: (202) 224-4521
Fax: (202) 224-2207

Email John Kyl using this form.

Tim Johnson

Michelle Obama Is The “Specifically Named Individual” On Page 64 of The Affidavit Submitted by FBI : NO QUARTER

Michelle Obama Is The “Specifically Named Individual” On Page 64 of The Affidavit Submitted by FBI : NO QUARTER: "By TruthtellergravatarcloseAuthor: Truthteller Name: Truthteller
Email: susanunpc@gmail.com
Site: http://noquarterusa.net/blog/
About: See Authors Posts (88) on December 9, 2008 at 6:37 PM

Please read the Criminal Complaint filed by David W. Cain, Special Agent of the FBI. Details of the conversations Blagojevich had with his operatives about Barack Obama and the possibility Barack Obama would strike several deals with Blagojevich regarding the open Senate seat are discussed, and yes, quotations are provided." Read more.

URGENT Message From Dr. Orly Taitz

YouTube - Orly 1

Part 2

URGENT MESSAGE rly 1

YouTube - Orly 1

Please Support Orly's Efforts!!

Orly has been spending $2000-3000 of her own money traveling to-from DC plus expenses. We at USATodayAdForObamaRecords hope to post a "chip-in" link soon, but for the time being please send your contributions to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation

26302 La Paz ste 211
Mission Viejo Ca 92691
ph. w 949-586-8110 c-949-683-5411

Bank of America
Account # 0992301937
Routing Number 122000661

An application for 501-c3 status has been filed in California.

Michelle Obama on court ordered inactive status with the Illinois State Attorneys bar from 1993, after only 4 years of practicing law. What did she do

LAWYER SEARCH: ATTORNEY'S REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC DISCIPLINARY RECORD



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and Public Disciplinary and Disability Information as of December 17, 2008 at 11:09:14 AM:

Full Licensed Name: Michelle Obama
Full Former name(s): Michelle Lavaughn Robinson
Date of Admission as Lawyer
by Illinois Supreme Court: May 12, 1989
Registered Business Address: Not available online

Registered Business Phone: Not available online
Illinois Registration Status: Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law - Last Registered Year: 1993
Malpractice Insurance:
(Current as of date of registration;
consult attorney for further information) No malpractice report required as attorney is on court ordered inactive status.

New u-tube videos part 1 & 2 Important

Click on the pictures to the right:
on the bottom is part 1
on the top is part 2

Reminder

Please remember to write to Att General Mike McCuskey, US att for Northern District of Illinois- Patrick Fitzgerald, cc all 50 att Gen, 9 Supremes and Senate and Congress and demand immediate inditment of Obama on massive fraud committed. Se prior article "Urgent, What needs to be done!" From Dec 13. They all need to know that the whole country is watching them and we all will hold them and our corrupt MSM acountable

Lightfoot is being resubmitted to Chief Justice Roberts. See analysis

I am writing an open letter to Chief Justice Roberts, I am resubmitting the petition to him. I could use an easy route and resubmit to Thomas and Scalia, but we already know that they are voting for the constitution. My concern is that twice during conferences the full court voted against the petitions, de facto against the constitution. At least 4 Justices had to vote yes for the petition to go to the oral argument. Since it didn't go there, it means that not only liberal Justices: Souter, Stevens, Bryer and Ginsburg and swing vote Kennedy voted against, but one of the conservative Justices: Roberts or Alito voted against as well, and I decided to zero in and see, which one is it. I need to resubmit not to Thomas or Scalia, but to either Roberts or Alito and by process of elimination, I will know which one is it. He will not be able to hide behind the conference anymore. I decided to write to Roberts. It will be an open letter, that will be posted on the Internet, it will be read at the numerous radio stations around the country, including the radio stations around all the military bases, it will be in the video form on U-tube, the whole country will be watching him. Roberts will not be able to hide, he will have to show to the whole nation, whether he is for the constitution of this country or whether he is ready to tear it apart in favor of some new world order conceived by a few bankers and the trilateral commission.
Additionally, Roberts has a duty to swear in the new president. This duty can be seen as a ministerial duty.
Lastly, the candidate needs to put his hand on a bible, that says that bear false witness is an abomination and I wonder, how Roberts, a Catholic, feels about it, based on all the massive fraud committed by Obama.
If at the end of the day our Judiciary, our law enforcement and our government fails us, we will have the right to remove the usurper using all means necessary. Our army is sworn to uphold the constitution, they have the right to remove the usurper from the White house to uphold the constitution, and we still have our second amendment right and we might need to use it to defend our rights and freedoms, guaranteed to us by our constitution.

Nearly 40,000 people visited the blog in 2 weeks

Response to the anonymous

There is something I have to explain to anonymous and his statement "people have spoken", which echoes a similar statement I hear from the MSM. I recall that in the USSR the communist party bragged about the fact that the people have spoken and voted for them- some 99%. They were not talking about the fact that corrupt and controlled media wasn't telling people the truth. I see the same thing today in the States. Our corrupt and bought media didn't report a drop of truth about BO's ineligibility. They didn't explain to people, that Hi statue 338 allows Hi citizens to register their children born abroad in HI and get Hi birth certificate for them, they didn't report that the Natural Born citizen has to have both parents, that are citizens. People running the media need to wake up and smell the coffee before their empires are taken apart and they are slapped with fraud law suits. Wake up people, start reporting the truth and cut your losses.

Do not be discouraged: we need to fight on

Over and over, people tell me they are discouraged because of the "failed" lawsuits. It is true that lawsuit after lawsuit was dimissed, one after another (Cort, Donofrio, etc). However, this is not the time to lose heart.

According to the Michigan Law Review special issue a few months ago on the "natural born citizenship" challenges to both Obama and McCain, it is unlikely that these controversies will be settled in court, because of the "standing" issue and something called "judiciability".

The reason "standing" prevents many of these lawsuits from being heard is that there is apparently a long-standing precedent that ordinary citizens cannot challenge a candidate who might be ineligible in a court because the ordinary citizens supposedly have not suffered any direct personal loss because of any potential ineligibility.

"Judiciability" is something that the courts struggle with all the time. Judges ask, is a given complaint something that should be settled by the courts, or is it best addressed politically? If an issue is not "judiciable", then the courts will not rule on it, but pass it on to the political process instead.

These two difficulties with legal challenges (which were anticipated months ago and therefore are no surprise to at least some observers and experts) seem to suggest that few (if any courts) would be willing to hear these sorts of complaints. However, these academic opinions might not be correct of course, and events might unfold in a different way than the legal experts writing in the Michigan Law Review anticipated.

However, even if the lawsuits were dismissed, that does not mean that the lawsuits were worthless. The lawsuits were and are invaluable and even crucial. Six weeks ago, I read that only 20 percent or so of the Republican readers of a conservative Orange County Register columnist had even heard of the eligibility issue, according to an informal survey. Now, I suspect that the fraction that have heard of this eligibility problem is likely far far greater.

I track the number of "Google news hits" a Google news search returns for the term "obama birth certificate" each day. I have tracked this number for weeks. This ccrude statistic is a count of the number of stories on the topic, over the last few days. About half of the news hits are from stictly online sources, and initially many were just blogs. I noticed that the number of "Google news hits" rose from about 170 over 2 months ago, to about one thousand around the time of the election. Then it dropped precipitously to approximately 300 two weeks ago. With the recent lawsuit news, it rose again to a peak of 3000, and yesterday this "Google news hits" number was in the neighborhood of 1500 or so. This suggests that this story is of growing interest generally, and is still present in the public eye in a substantial way.

Because the US mainstream press has been very reluctant to cover this issue, people often do not know about it. Even the conservative media has been essentially silent on this topic. Where are our vaunted icons of conservative talk radio? Where is the belligerent and foaming-at-the-mouth, rabidly right-wing Fox News? For the most part, these two media segments have also "drank the purple koolaid". Those following this eligiblity issue and promoting it have been repeatedly dismissed as belonging to a lunatic fringe, or pejoratively called "conspiracy theorists". However, these charges are getting tougher and tougher to make as momentum builds. This is thanks partly to these lawsuits and the attention they place on the eligibility controversy.

There are signs our message is getting out there. One of our volunteers called an Illinois elector last weekend, and was informed that all of the Illinois electors were being called to the state capital for a meeting Sunday night before the voting, to discuss the situation with lawyers. This meeting apparently was to help them address their fears of the legal consequences of voting for Obama. Even if they all voted for Obama (and we have not yet heard if there were any faithless electors yet, something previously so rare that there were less than half a dozen in over two centuries), the fact that the Illinois electors had this meeting at all speaks volumes for the impact we are having. And a large number of the concerns these electors have are the result of the impact of our calls and letters and the lawsuits (even the dismissed lawsuits).

A second indication of the influence we are having is from another call that another volunteer made last night to a congresswoman. This congresswoman indicated her willingness and enthusiasm to speak out about this issue in Congress when it meets in January. Of course, this does not indicate that she will actually do what she said she would, but this sort of assertion never would have happened if it had not been for our movement raising the profile of this controversy. With the mainstream media and the conservative media essentially silent, we had to get the word out using "any means necessary"; phone calls, FAXes, emails, mail, lawsuits, petitions, etc. Even the dismissed lawsuits serve as an integral part of this effort, although that was clearly not the reason they were filed. Now is not the time to give up!

A third indication of the value of our approach comes from an amazing speech by left wing icon Noam Chomsky. Chomsky attacks Obama over and over for his lack of transparency, and for behaving differently than they expected (signalling his intention to pursue a bellicose foreign policy and showing evidence of being controlled by big money interests). Amazingly, this crowd of leftists cheered enthusiastically when Chomsky made these charges! I personally had pointed out these same shortcomings over and over for well over a year, but my complaints fell on deaf ears. No one wanted to hear that there were any problems with the "Messiah". Almost everyone laughed at me as a lunatic, and called me a "right wing nut", stupid, or worse. Now, our complaints about a lack of openness are gaining traction. We cannot stop now!

A fourth indication that momentum is building is the revelation that law enforcement, including the FBI, has been keeping close tabs on Obama and his criminal associates. A few weeks ago, when I was discussing my concerns with Obama with an FBI analyst, he dismissed me as a conspiracy theorist on the fringe, essentially parroting statements in the media. I doubt if he would do the same now. The emergence of serious legal charges swirling around the Obama Camp and its associates has made our claims far more credible, and adds to the general air of distrust that is accumulating.

Some of the electors we contacted have expressed their frustration at our efforts with expletive-filled replies. I would suggest that this is a hopeful sign; we are not being ignored. We are raising the issue. We want people to be aware of the eligibility controversy and to discuss it. There is no such thing as bad publicity, because we want this controversy to be examined carefully by the public. Most of the public is unaware of this controversy and has not studied the evidence yet. If people complain bitterly to their friends and the media about our efforts, so much the better. It will keep this topic in the public eye, and more will investigate the actual controversy. Some will reach the same conclusion we have reached, swelling our ranks. It is even worse for us to be ignored, as we were previously.

Finally, we have signs that the Republican party is finally waking about some of these issues and might be willing to pursue them. Because the Republicans were unable or unwilling to focus on Obama's eligibility problems, the fox almost got into the henhouse. The primary checks and balances to prevent something like this eligibility issue from being ignored and left unaddressed are (1) the challenges from the opposing party and (2) the scrutiny of the media. In the case of the eligibility controversy, both of these two important factors were inexplicably almost totally absent. If the Republicans will step up to the plate with their resources, the game will be very different. And the only reason they will commit to this project is because we have raised the profile of this controversy through grassroots efforts, including the lawsuits (even including the dismissed lawsuits, as disappointing as those results are). Let's not give up hope now!

What is needed now is to mount a concerted attack on these eligibility issues as Obama faces the next hurdles before becoming inaugurated at the end of January. The media, Secretaries of State, Election Commissions, State Governors, State Attorneys General, and State and Federal Legislators need to hear from us; FAXes, emails, phone calls, and snail mail. Let's keep up the momentum and continue to express our concern with these issues!

Tips for contacting legislators

I am no expert in this, but here are some useful suggestions I have culled from my reading.

Form letters are less effective. After seeing the first one or two, recipients will just ignore the rest.

Congressmen and Senators and state legislators are less interested in hearing from people who are not in their districts. So bear that in mind when you contact them.

Gmail will not reveal your location through your IP address, but many other email programs will.

Direct dialing Congressional and Senate offices will often reveal your location, but using the central congressional switchboards will supposedly not. You can also set your telephone to not reveal your originating number. There are many toll free numbers for reaching the Congressional switchboard. For example, a quick search turned up:

1-877-851-6437

1-888-335-3588

1-888-818-6641

1-800-828-0498

1-800-459-1887

1-800-614-2803

1-866-340-9281

1-866-338-1015

1-866-220-0044


The name of the game in lobbying is irritation and impact. The more staff time it takes to deal with our contact efforts, the more aware our elected officials will be that we are concerned. And the more concern that is expressed, the more nervous these elected officials will be that they will lose their positions, replete with power and perks, if they do not respond to us appropriately.

So how do we have an impact? Email is easily blocked or deleted, but can be sent out in immense volumes, and with great frequency. If you have the option of requesting a response in your email, you should do so. This will force someone to expend effort and energy to deal with your message, and therefore have more of an impact. Faxes and snail mail occupy space and consume time and effort and resources. Phone calls draw on staff resources. The advantage of telephone calls is that they often can produce more useful feedback of the effectiveness of our efforts than other contact methods.

Therefore, I would guess that emails are not as effective as faxes, which are less effective than snail mail, which is less effective than certified letters. Telephone calls are also pretty effective, but I am not sure how they compare to regular physical mail.

Email attachments are often never opened. Email with attachments is sometimes discarded because attachments often contain viruses. Embed any attachments in the body of the email if possible. Gmail allows one to place images in the email body quite easily, for example.

Many elected officials are starting to use web-based tools to cut down on email spam. Looking at the source code of these webpages with email forms can sometimes reveal the true email address of the intended recipient. However, many of these emails sent from these sorts of tools are filtered to reject those that are outside the legislator's district. Even regular email to a legislator's office can go through a similar filter. Bear that in mind when you use these web-based tools. Many of the aides and staff of these legislators, who are often quite influential, still have regular email addresses and so can be contacted by conventional bulk email.

Shorter email messages and letters are typically better because there is a greater chance they will be read.

Placing a long list of email addresses in the "To" slot in your email program is not helpful. An email obviously sent to a long list of people might be discarded automatically as spam in some cases. Even if the software does not reject this sort of email, people receiving such an email might ignore it as spam. If they do read it, they will feel more comfortable ignoring the issues raised since they believe that surely someone else on this huge list will tend to the problem. Therefore, put any long list of email addresses in the "bcc" slot in your email program, and mail the message to yourself. That way the recipients will not know how many are on your email list and what their addresses are. Some email software is designed for bulk emailing and will do this automatically for you.

Robert Stevens

comment on press confwerence from free Republic

2:28:00 - You may especially wish to hear Orly Taitz at this point. She gets to the point with the news media. A very refreshing point in a very informative and challenging segment.

Just one potential admonition if you will allow. I did not hear the term "fictitious presidency" used, but maybe I just missed it. I did hear "usurper," though. Both apply. Come to think of it, I.O. should have been using these terms more its prior articles, too...

comment on press conference

To: albie
Orly is great. One of the women who works for ABC’s Nightline told orly to go home (USSR). Typical disgusting contempt by the MSM.

From free republic

To: savedbygrace
“Wow, Orly Taitz really gives the reporters hell, doesn’t she?”

...she’s terrific! One of the very few times that these scumbag reporters have been called to task. It seems to take someone who has lived with or knows socialism from the inside and through life experience to really get worked up. They realize how important and fragile freedom and the free market is. Most of America’s dummies don’t even know what it is and don’t care. They’re more concerned that Oprah is up to 200 lbs.

Idea for President's executive order in re to Obama

I talked today with the audience on Andrea Shea-King show in Florida.
two new ideas came up:
1. Writing to President Bush and Vice President Chaney and demanding an executive order, deeming Obama ineligible for presidency, due to the fact that his father was a foreigner.
2. Issuing an executive order, demanding that Obama sign a consent to produce documents, verifying his citizenship, such as his original birth certificate, passports, immigration and naturalization records, school and college enrollment records and so on.

Another idea is to have stickers for cars: "Obama is not a Natural born Citizen". "Obama ois not eligible for presidency", "I sued Obama and proud of it"
Let me know if you would like to participate in this effort

Chicago corruption investigation

http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm


Grand Jury Subpoenas Issued for Rezko/Obama Land Deal


A former Illinois bank official, now claiming whistleblower status, says bank officials replaced a loan reappraisal that he prepared for a Chicago property that was purchased by the wife of now-convicted felon Tony Rezko, part of which was later sold to next-door neighbor Barack Obama.

In a complaint filed Thursday in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Kenneth J. Connor said that his reappraisal of Rita Rezko's property was replaced with a higher one and that he was fired when he questioned the document.

"Connor's internal whistle-blowing activity at Mutual Bank implicates Mutual Bank and the potentially guilty officers thereof to prosecution under federal and Illinois statutes," said the complaint, filed by attorney Glenn R. Gaffney.

The complaint said Mutual Bank officials could be guilty of making false statements, willfully overvaluing property, bank fraud, witness retaliation, willful violation of a lawful subpoena, FDIC violations, and state banking regulations.
_____________________________________________________


I Know Nothing!


On December 11th, Obama said, "I am quite confident that no representatives of mine would have had any part in any deals related to this seat."

However, The Chicago Tribune reported on Saturday, the 13th, confirms FOX News Chicago's report from Thursday, December 11th:


A source said that contact between the Obama camp and the governor’s administration regarding the Senate seat began the Saturday before the Nov. 4 election, when Emanuel made a call to the cell phone of Harris (Blagojevich's Chief of Staff, John Harris). The conversation took place around the same time press reports surfaced about Emanuel being approached about taking the high-level White House post should Obama win.

Emanuel delivered a list of candidates who would be "acceptable" to Obama, the source said. On the list were Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett, Illinois Veterans Affairs director Tammy Duckworth, state Comptroller Dan Hynes and U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky of Chicago, the source said. All are Democrats.

Sometime after the election, Emanuel called Harris back to add the name of Democratic Atty. Gen. Lisa Madigan to the approved list, the source said.

Another source told the Tribune that "communications between Emanuel and the Blagojevich administration were captured on court-approved wiretaps."

Lightfoot v Bowen info

No. 08A524
Title: Gail Lightfoot, et al., Applicants
v.
Debra Bowen, California Secretary of State

Docketed:
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
Case Nos.: (S168690)

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 12 2008 Application (08A524) for a stay pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Kennedy.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioners:
Orly Taitz 26302 La Paz (949) 683-5411
Counsel of Record Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Party name: Gail Lightfoot, et al.

False Obot Rumor

Somebody spread a rumor that Lightfoot v Bowen was denied by the Supreme Court of the US, that is not true. It is still being reviewed and more cases are coming

letter from the reader, supreme Court information

Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:39:30 -0600

Subject: Re: Action for today


Isn't it too late in the day to call? Why haven't we heard what was decided? The vote was supposed to be on FRIDAY.C

On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:53 AM, Linda S wrote:

Sometime today, the SC will make a decision on Leo's case. I suggest we all keep their phones busy. Call each justice. You probably will not get to talk to the but leave a message and let them know we are watchng. That we expect them to uphold our constitution and that this is not going away until Obama shows his documents.

The following is the info to call.

Lyn


John G. Roberts Jr., Chief Justice of the United States


The Supreme Court Associate Justices are as follows:


John Paul Stevens

Samuel A. Alito Jr.

Antonin Scalia

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Anthony M. Kennedy

David H. Sauter

Clarence Thomas

Stephen G. Breyer


FYI, Supreme Court HELPFUL TELEPHONE NUMBERS

Public Information Office: 202-479-3211, Reporters press 1

Clerk's Office: 202-479-3011

Visitor Information Line: 202-479-3030

Opinion Announcements: 202-479-3360

If you call, report here who you talked to and what was said, message left, etc.

US Supreme Court Docketed on the 12.12.08.

Search Results
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Searching for 08a524.
Found: 1 Showing: 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Docket for 08A524
No. 08A524 Title: Gail Lightfoot, et al., Applicants v. Debra Bowen, California Secretary of State Docketed: Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California Case Nos.: (S168690) ~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dec 12 2008

[12/15/2008] (2k)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Found: 1 Showing: 1

Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. YouTube Channel

DrOrlyTV

Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. YouTube Channel, Monday 12/8/2008

Featuring Dr. Taitz's presentation of the case against Presidential Candidate Barack Obama's eligibility as well as the National Press Club conference

Open letter to the US Attorney and FBI from Natural Born citizen Jerry Reese

Open Letter to Our Elected Officials
December 14, 2008

I am a proud American citizen and have been diligently following the 2008 Presidential campaign and election process. As we get closer to placing Barack H. Obama into office, I feel compelled to write to you, our elected officials regarding some very serious concerns that I have. I question how we can allow a person to become our President and know nothing about him except what we have been spoon-fed by the news media. I have spent a considerable amount of time researching each of the candidates, in an attempt to know who they are and determine if they are eligible and qualified to become our President. As Barack H. Obama has already won the popular vote, my research has been narrowed to focus on this man. What I am learning is shocking! Based on my findings, Barack H. Obama should NOT be allowed to become our next President. It is my opinion that Barack H. Obama has defrauded the American public and does not meet the minimum requirements to become the President of the United States. To support my accusation, I will present the issues and what needs to be done immediately to restore honor and integrity to the pending Presidential election.
Issues
 Barack H. Obama is not a ‘natural born citizen’ of the United States. Barack has publicly claimed to be a British citizen. For this reason alone, he has admitted that he is not eligible to become our President. Barack Obama’s advanced studies have specialized in US Constitutional Law. He knows, without a doubt, that he is not eligible and is aware that he has committed a crime by placing his name on the ballot to become President of the United States.
 The US Constitution and the Law of Nations clearly define the requirements to be eligible for the office of President of the United States. To begin with, the candidate must be born on the United States of America soil, which we will assume Barack H. Obama was, as reported on the 'Certification of Live Birth' document that Barack has provided. The matter of the authenticity of the ‘Certification of Live Birth’ document and its underlying meaning need not be discussed at this point to demonstrate that Barack H. Obama, Jr. is ineligible.

 In addition to the requirement that the child/person must be born on US soil, the citizenship status of the born child's parents further establish the citizenship of the child.

 Barack Obama's father, as stated on the 'Certification of Live Birth' document and within books written by Barack H. Obama, Jr., demonstrate he was born in Kenya, Africa. At the time of Barack H. Obama, Jr.'s birth, Kenya was under the control of Great Britain, thereby being a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom's dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama, Sr. was a British subject, whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.'s children, thereby making Barack H. Obama, Jr. a British citizen. Barack H. Obama, Jr. states in his books that he is a British citizen.

 Barack Obama, Jr.’s mother was a citizen of Hawaii, thereby making her a US citizen. Due to the fact that Barack Obama, Sr. was a British citizen and Stanley Ann Dunham Obama was a United States citizen, Barack H. Obama, Jr. had dual nationality and was therefore subject to the jurisdiction of Kenya as well as the USA.

 The state of Hawaii allows parents to register the birth of their child within a defined period of time after the birth, even if the child is born in a foreign country. There are minimal requirements that Hawaii requires of the parents to provide this capability. A ‘Certification of Live Birth’ does not mean that the child was born in Hawaii. It merely means that the birth has been registered with the state of Hawaii. To better understand the details of these laws and this process, the Hawaiian laws should be referenced.

 Now, with regard to the authenticity of the ‘Certification of Live Birth’ document that Barack provided, there is sufficient evidence to prove that this document is a forgery. He has provided the forged ‘Certificate of Live Birth’ document, claiming to have been born in the state of Hawaii. Experts have analyzed this document and have declared them a forgery.
 Barack H. Obama was adopted by his step-father, Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian citizen. Indonesia does not allow dual citizenship. Therefore, Barack H. Obama became an Indonesian citizen, relinquishing his citizenship at the time of the adoption.
 Barack has refused to release any of his personal records to prove his eligibility to become President. The vault copy of his birth certificate has been sealed; his college records have been sealed; his travel records, including passports have been withheld from viewing; his medical records have been withheld from viewing; his Selective Service Registration has been analyzed by experts and has been deemed a forgery.
 Barack H. Obama has fraudulently sworn to be a ‘natural born citizen’ during the Presidential campaign certification process. He had the audacity to sign official campaign certification documents in the presence of an official Notary Public, declaring he was a ‘natural born citizen’.
 Barack H. Obama has defrauded the American public by accepting campaign funds in the hundreds of millions of dollars, under false pretenses.
 Barack H. Obama has committed an act of fraud by virtue of the fact that he did not disclose any of his alias’ at the time he applied for his attorney’s license in the State of Illinois. Barack lied under oath while being sworn in as an attorney in Illinois, stating that he had no other names.

 There is rumor to the affect that Barack H. Obama committed acts of bribery. Obama reportedly accepted a bribe as a senator when he arranged a grant for Yesse Yehudah so he could take a $10,000 cut.
 The list goes on and on. Something must be done to stop this criminal activity.
What Must Be Done
 We must demand immediate indictments of Barack H. Obama on massive fraud charges.
 The FBI and US Attorney’s office need to immediately investigate the expert reports that demonstrate forged ‘Certification of Live Birth’ documents and forged Selective Service Registration documents;
 Subpoena Barack’s original birth certificate (not ‘Certification of Live Birth’), one that shows the doctor(s) name, hospital name, specific location of the birth, including the city, state, county, and country, the mother and father’s name and citizenship status at the time of birth, appropriate official state seals, doctor’s signature(s);
 Subpoena Barack’s medical records;
 Subpoena Barack’s travel records from birth to current date, including passport records;
 Subpoena Barack’s college records, including entrance forms and funding grants;
 Subpoena the medical records, coroner’s reports and death certificates for his grandmother Madelyn Dunham and his mother Stanley Ann Dunham (aka Obama, aka Soetoro, aka Sutoro, aka Anna Toot) and investigate why the mother’s deceased social security number ‘535-40-8522’ shows as active as late as 2006, when she died in 1995;
 Investigate the fraudulent information submitted on Barack’s Illinois Law License;
 Indictments must be forthcoming and issued as soon as possible, before January 20th, 2009. The American people deserve to have the United States Constitution upheld. This critical matter must take the highest priority as possible. The office of President of the United States is no place for an usurper. Barack H. Obama must be held accountable for the crimes he has committed and must be prevented from committing further crimes.
I am pleading with you to not look at this matter, from a superficial viewpoint. It is deep and complex and is nothing like it appears on the surface. There is a wealth of information regarding these issues readily available for reference. Some of the best sources of information are contained within the pages of the many lawsuits that have been filed across the United States. The details and facts are there. We must give them credence and listen to what we are being told before it is too late. Every elected official has a right and responsibility to demand proof of the three primary requirements to become President of the United States. If we are hesitant to demand this proof, we are criminally negligent in our duties. The consequences of our mistakes could hurt our country for decades to come. Our children and grandchildren deserve the right to live under the protection of the US Constitution, as our Forefathers intended. These decisions, whatever they may be, could be setting a precedence, thereby opening the door for any foreign national to become President of the United States in the future. It is our duty to prevent this.

Sincerely,
Jerry Reese
A Patriotic “Natural Born Citizen” American Citizen


CC: Michael Mukasey, United States Attorney General
Michael Chertoff, Secretary Homeland Security
Patrick Fitzgerald, Illinois Attorney General
FBI, Springfield, Illinois

Obamagate makes the Supermarket Tabloids!

Finally, the Obama Eligibility Controversy has become high enough profile that it has made its way to the front page of a supermarket tabloid. I guess this shows that this information is slowly making its way into the public consciousness.

Robert Stevens

Part of the National Press club conference on Youtube

View a short segment of the December 8, 2008 press conference at the National Press Club in this youtube video:




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0riQMj1BvwM

Ideas for demonstration slogans from Mr. Markham Robinson

To All,



We need short, pointed, true slogans for signs. Please give us your suggestions.



My proposals.



Ø Constitution Not Just a Technicality!



Ø President Natural Born for Good Reason!



Ø Obama Kenyan, Omani, Indonesian or Brit?



Ø Show Us Full Original Certificate!
How Hard Can It Be?



Ø Obama, What Are You Hiding?!
Show Us Your Birth Certificate!



Ø Electors Vote Obey Your Oath,
Only Natural Born Presidents



Markham

File with the FCC - A Matter of National Security

Call to action.

I just went to the FCC website and filed a complaint. I think the more people complaining the more likely we will get some action.

People should also write a letter and print out affidavits on Orly's site and overnight to the FCC.

Pamela

To file a complaint online.

1. Go to www.fcc.gov.
2. Click on the link Filing a Complaint on left side of page closer to bottom.
3. Click on Broadcast.
4. Click on Unauthorized.
5. Fill in Form.

What I typed in comment box at end. (I think there is only space for 500 characters.)

Matter of National Security

I have seen all of the MSM national outlets commit felony fraud by saying that Barack Obama's Hawaii Certification of Live Birth is a legitimate document, when it is not. Not one document expert has looked at this document and confirmed its authenticity. I have a signed affidavit that was filed in the Berg v. Obama Citizenship lawsuit that asserts the document is a complete fraud. In addition, all of the MSMs fail to tell their audience that Hawaii law allowed registration of foreign births.

This is of GRAVE NATIONAL IMPORTANCE, BECAUSE IT IS POSSIBLE THAT OBAMA MAY NOT BECOME PRESIDENT BECAUSE OF BEING UNQUALIFED DUE TO NOT BEING A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. PLEASE TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION.

1. PLEASE FORBID THE MEDIA OF REFERRING TO THE COLB POSTED ON THE INTERNET AS BEING AUTHENTIC.

2. MAKE ALL MEDIA DO A STORY EVERY DAY ON EVERY NEWS PROGRAM ON THE FRAUDULENT DOCUMENT AND THE SIGNIFIGANCE OF THE FRAUDULENT DOCUMENT. THIS NEEDS TO BE DONE FOR A WEEK.

Evidence of shady business dealings between Obama and Blagojevich

Thanks to the criminal complaint of FBI Special Agent David Crain, we now have a lot more evidence of shady behavior by Obama in the Blagjoevich affair. Obama is believed to have offered Blagojevich a "quid pro quo" after two years in office. It appears as though Blagojevich was willing to appoint Obama's choice to his vacant Senate seat in exchange for a good paying job for Blagojevich or his wife, or other considerations. See this article yesterday for more details.

Robert Stevens.

Some are planning to protest on Monday

Some groups are planning to protest on Monday at the State capitols. Some are planning to bring signs: "Obama is not eligible for Presidency" "Natural born Citizen-is one that was born in US to 2 parents, that are US citizens" "Obama's father was a foreigner- he doesn't qualify as a natural born Citizen"

Even Pravda

Interestingly, even Pravda has been publishing some startling articles detailing the Obama Eligibility Controversy:

*Obama Conspiracy Nuts

*Barack, The Amazing Mr. Obama

*Obama Has NOT Been Elected President

*Obama The Chicken

What does that say about the American Mainstream Media, when a lot of this material appears in foreign publications, but not in US publications? After all, the story about his illegal alien grandmother who was illegally on US public assistance in Boston for the last several years was first broken in a UK paper. Amazing. Where is the US media in all this? Are they not supposed to be our watchdog?

Robert Stevens

Essence of Military Action

Essence of the Military action
Mr. Turner
the case will have just one count. Natural born citizen, is one that was born in this country to two US citizens. His father was not a US citizen, and therefor he is illegitimate for presidency. Additionally there is no corroborative evidence of him being born in HI, since HI statue 338-176, 338-178 allow Hawaiian residence to register in Hi their children born abroad and the HI birth certification can be issued based on a statement of one relative only. Regardless of where he was born, he is not a natural born citizen.
Military personal that is in active duty or retired that can be called to active duty will be seeking declaratory relief to pronounce Obama not eligible for the position of President and Commander in Chief and therefor active members of the military or retired members that can be recalled to active duty are under no obligation to take orders from Barack Hussein Obama, as Commander in Chief.

Urgent! What needs to be done now

There are a number of things you can do:

1. write to all 9 US Supreme Court justices in support of Lightfoot v Bowen, docket number 08A524

2. become a correspondent on my blog drorly.blogspot.com 

3. Very important!!! write an open letter to US att in Illinois Patrick Fitzgerald, cc US att in DC Mike McCuskey, cc General Director of FBI, cc FBI in all the states and demand immediate indictments of Obama on massive fraud for following reasons:

a. he is not a natural born citizen (his father was a foreign subject, he doesn't qualify as a natural born, since both parents have to be citizens at the time of the child's birth in order to qualify as a natural born citizen, see Law of Nations ), he became a candidate on the ballot by fraud

b. fraud committed in collecting $650 million under false pretenses

c. lying under oath while being sworn as an attorney in Illinois (stated that he had no other names, concealed his identities, since he went by Barry Obama and Barry Soetoro)

d. Contact the FBI and US attorney's office, and assert that they need to investigate immediately expert reports showing that his selective service certificate is forged

e. Instruct the FBI and US Attorney's office that they need to subpoena his original birth certificate and investigate reports that the short form "certification of live birth" that Obama presented to the public appears to have been altered, fake or "forged".

f. The FBI and the US Attorney's office needs to subpoena medical records, coroners reports and death certificates for his grandmother Madelyn Dunham and has mother Stanley Ann Dunham (aka Obama, aka Soetoro, aka Sutoro aka Anna Toot) and investigate why the mother's deceased social security number 535-40-8522 shows as active as late as 2006, when she allegedly died in 1995. It shows 2 addresses in HI and 2 addresses in NY.

Please call FBI and US attorney's office and demand daily updates, as to when the indictments will be forthcoming. Those have to be issued ASAP, before Jan 20, 2009. You should also contact your state attorney general's office.

4. you can forward my pleadings in Lightfoot v Bowen and footage of 12.08.08. press conference at the National Press club to all the congressmen, senators, media and your friends and family. Thank you for willingness to help.


Contact Information

United States Attorney's Office
Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division
219 S. Dearborn St., 5th Floor
Chicago, IL 60604
Phone: (312) 353-5300

United States Attorney's Office
Northern District of Illinois, Western Division
308 W. State St., Ste 300
Rockford, IL 61101
Phone: (815) 987-4444

Correspondence to the Department of Justice, including the Attorney General, may be sent to:

U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
BY E-MAIL:

E-mails to the Department of Justice, including the Attorney General, may be sent to AskDOJ@usdoj.gov.

For the Illinois Attorney General, addresses and phone numbers are here. You can email the Illinois Attorney General's office by using this contact form.

Contact the FBI.

Dr. Orly Taitz, DDS Esq

Coordinated Efforts for Contacting the FCC

A number of people want to write open letters to FCC. Who wants to be involved in this project? If you do, please contact our Petitioner, Ms. Pamela Barnett, from Lightfoot v Bowen filing. She is spearheading this project. Email Pam.

Lightfoot v Bowen Now On SCOTUS Docket

Lightfoot v Bowen, filed in the Supreme Court, is now Docket #08A524. Justice Anthony Kennedy will review it first. Volunteers, we will need help. Please call, fax and write to show support for this case.

In regards to military Dr. Orly can represent a group of military personal and ex-military, refusing to take orders from illegitimate commander in chief. We need to spread the word and have a large group of military.

See previous post for more details:

How to help Dr. Orly Right Now

News from Washington State

Stephen Pidgeon's case in Washington State, where 14 plaintiffs are suing the Washington Secretary of State Samuel Reed, has received some attention. The judge has agreed to have a hearing on this case, according to the latest rumor.

Robert Stevens