Hello everyone,
I am not sure I see Phil's email address on this. Someone please make sure
he sees this.
This comes from the Army website. They have had this in the works since 2005
it seems.
Civilian Inmate Labor Program - Army Regulation 210—35
http://www.army.mil/usapa/epubs/pdf/r210_35.pdf
God be with us all.
Stephen
Saturday, December 20, 2008
Does Barack Obama Sing the Tiger Song?
Nadhmi Auchi and Saddam Hussein
How many have heard of Nadhmi Auchi? Why are we not hearing more about him?
Nadhmi Auchi was born in 1937. He is an Iraqi born British-resident and Britain's 22nd wealthiest individual.
Nadhmi Auchi co-conspired with fellow Baathist Saddam Hussein in 1959 to assassinate then Prime Minister Abd al-Karim Qasim. Rezko and Obama are both financially connected to him.
MSNBC reports that Nadhmi Auchi had helped Orascom (which owns Djezzy GSM), owned by Onsi Sawiris, gain a contract to set-up mobile phone networks in post-Saddam's Iraq.
As per Orascom's annual report, page 65, Huawei Technologies is listed as a subsidiary of Orascom.
NATO code-named Huawei network's “Tiger Song”.
The Huawei network was used to shoot down allied aircraft flying patrol over the Iraqi skies.
The network was installed in violation of an U.N. embargo. Worse still, the air defense network was paid for by the corrupt oil-for-food program which sent cash to Huawei that was intended to feed starving Iraqi children.
So why would Barack Hussein Obama know anything about a "Tiger Song"?
The Times Online UK reported in February 2008:
Excerpt:
Court papers describe Mr Rezko as a close friend of Mr Auchi, although Mr Auchi disputes this. The two are involved in a large Chicago land development together. But it is unclear how long the two men have known each other or whether they were linked before the 2003 Iraq war. Neither side would discuss their relationship.
The Times has, however, discovered state documents in Illinois recording that Fintrade Services, a Panamanian company, lent money to Mr Obama’s fundraiser in May 2005.
Fintrade’s directors include Ibtisam Auchi, the name of Mr Auchi’s wife.
Letter from a reader
Ted said...
If 1/20/09 comes and goes with a usurper in the Whitehouse with usurper enablers in Congress and the Supreme Court … God help us because many of the people will — rightfully and under our Constitution and Declaration of Independence — endeavor forcefully to take back the Government from what is nothing less than a coup d’etat.
SCOTUS now does have the power to forestall that grim yet inevitable scenario, otherwise the blood and possible loss of our Constitutional Republic is SQUARELY ON THEIR HEADS.
If 1/20/09 comes and goes with a usurper in the Whitehouse with usurper enablers in Congress and the Supreme Court … God help us because many of the people will — rightfully and under our Constitution and Declaration of Independence — endeavor forcefully to take back the Government from what is nothing less than a coup d’etat.
SCOTUS now does have the power to forestall that grim yet inevitable scenario, otherwise the blood and possible loss of our Constitutional Republic is SQUARELY ON THEIR HEADS.
Letter from a reader
Ted said...
If 1/20/09 comes and goes with a usurper in the Whitehouse with usurper enablers in Congress and the Supreme Court … God help us because many of the people will — rightfully and under our Constitution and Declaration of Independence — endeavor forcefully to take back the Government from what is nothing less than a coup d’etat.
SCOTUS now does have the power to forestall that grim yet inevitable scenario, otherwise the blood and possible loss of our Constitutional Republic is SQUARELY ON THEIR HEADS.
If 1/20/09 comes and goes with a usurper in the Whitehouse with usurper enablers in Congress and the Supreme Court … God help us because many of the people will — rightfully and under our Constitution and Declaration of Independence — endeavor forcefully to take back the Government from what is nothing less than a coup d’etat.
SCOTUS now does have the power to forestall that grim yet inevitable scenario, otherwise the blood and possible loss of our Constitutional Republic is SQUARELY ON THEIR HEADS.
Letter from a reader- all the rights that we lost
Dear American Citizen;
The attached video is something that EVERY CITIZEN in America needs to see from the beginning of the video until it fades out at the end. (There is more of the film after the credits.) http://invisiblepatriots.com/web2/Russo0.html
The American population has been asleep for almost an entire century. In that time we have lost the country that our forefathers strived so hard to create; the country that our young men and women have fought and died to preserve. For the last four generations we have allowed our rights, money and our Constitution itself to be usurped right out from in under our noses.
We have depended on our elected officials to “take care of us” without being monitored and held accountable for what they do to us instead of for us. In this video you will hear TRUTHS based on FACTS not a mess of propaganda meant to confuse and alter your views of reality like our news sources seem to have a tendency to feed us when they want us to behave in a certain way.
I copied the following information from the video in case you need a little encouragement to get you to watch an almost two hour long film.
President Bush has signed executive orders giving him sole authority to impose martial law, and suspend habeas corpus. This gives him dictatorial power over the people, without any checks and balances.
The government can jail you for life without charges, without a trial, and without a lawyer.
Because of globalization the U. S. must accept other nations’ laws.
Under the CAFTA treaty the sale of vitamins and supplements will be illegal.
Executive Order # 10999
Allows the government to take over all modes of transportation.
Executive Order #11000
Allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.
Executive Order #11921
Provides that the President can declare a state of emergency that is not defined, and Congress cannot review the action for six months.
Senate Bill #1873
Allows the government to vaccinate you with untested vaccines against your will.
The FDA says Americans do not have a right to know which foods are genetically modified.
Congressman Sensenbrenner’s bill (HR 1528) requires you to spy on your neighbors, including wearing a wire. Refusal would be punishable by mandatory prison sentence of at least two years.
The government claims the power to seize all financial instruments, currency, gold, silver, and everything else if they deem an emergency exists. Treasury Department Letter August 12, 2005.
There are 190 countries in the world. America has bases in 130 of them.
The Patriot Act permits:
Secret FBI and police searches of your home and office.
Secret government wiretaps on your phone, computer, and/or Internet activity.
Secret investigations of your bank records, credit cards and other financial records.
Secret investigations of your library and book activities.
Secret examination of your medical, travel and business records.
The freezing of funds and assets without prior notice or appeal.
The creation of secret “watch lists” that ban those named from air and other travel.
“The Constitution is just a goddamn piece of paper.” George W. Bush, November 2005, Capital Hill Blue
In case your education is as lacking as mine was here is another video that you will need to watch to help you get brought into the 21st Century. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Qy97pFDLig
When you have watched both of these videos please take a little more time to check out the information on the following web sites which are the facts for the next chapter in America’s history.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nN4J2VZ75PQ&feature=email
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rd5gm8XKv_w
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/11/exclusive_did_n.html
http://www.freedomtofascism.com/index.html
If this information has made you as concerned about our country as it did me you will join me in forwarding this note to any and every American citizen you can!
Thank you for your time.
Karen
The attached video is something that EVERY CITIZEN in America needs to see from the beginning of the video until it fades out at the end. (There is more of the film after the credits.) http://invisiblepatriots.com/web2/Russo0.html
The American population has been asleep for almost an entire century. In that time we have lost the country that our forefathers strived so hard to create; the country that our young men and women have fought and died to preserve. For the last four generations we have allowed our rights, money and our Constitution itself to be usurped right out from in under our noses.
We have depended on our elected officials to “take care of us” without being monitored and held accountable for what they do to us instead of for us. In this video you will hear TRUTHS based on FACTS not a mess of propaganda meant to confuse and alter your views of reality like our news sources seem to have a tendency to feed us when they want us to behave in a certain way.
I copied the following information from the video in case you need a little encouragement to get you to watch an almost two hour long film.
President Bush has signed executive orders giving him sole authority to impose martial law, and suspend habeas corpus. This gives him dictatorial power over the people, without any checks and balances.
The government can jail you for life without charges, without a trial, and without a lawyer.
Because of globalization the U. S. must accept other nations’ laws.
Under the CAFTA treaty the sale of vitamins and supplements will be illegal.
Executive Order # 10999
Allows the government to take over all modes of transportation.
Executive Order #11000
Allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.
Executive Order #11921
Provides that the President can declare a state of emergency that is not defined, and Congress cannot review the action for six months.
Senate Bill #1873
Allows the government to vaccinate you with untested vaccines against your will.
The FDA says Americans do not have a right to know which foods are genetically modified.
Congressman Sensenbrenner’s bill (HR 1528) requires you to spy on your neighbors, including wearing a wire. Refusal would be punishable by mandatory prison sentence of at least two years.
The government claims the power to seize all financial instruments, currency, gold, silver, and everything else if they deem an emergency exists. Treasury Department Letter August 12, 2005.
There are 190 countries in the world. America has bases in 130 of them.
The Patriot Act permits:
Secret FBI and police searches of your home and office.
Secret government wiretaps on your phone, computer, and/or Internet activity.
Secret investigations of your bank records, credit cards and other financial records.
Secret investigations of your library and book activities.
Secret examination of your medical, travel and business records.
The freezing of funds and assets without prior notice or appeal.
The creation of secret “watch lists” that ban those named from air and other travel.
“The Constitution is just a goddamn piece of paper.” George W. Bush, November 2005, Capital Hill Blue
In case your education is as lacking as mine was here is another video that you will need to watch to help you get brought into the 21st Century. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Qy97pFDLig
When you have watched both of these videos please take a little more time to check out the information on the following web sites which are the facts for the next chapter in America’s history.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nN4J2VZ75PQ&feature=email
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rd5gm8XKv_w
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/11/exclusive_did_n.html
http://www.freedomtofascism.com/index.html
If this information has made you as concerned about our country as it did me you will join me in forwarding this note to any and every American citizen you can!
Thank you for your time.
Karen
More connections
If you recall, Ann Dunham ss number came active as late as 2006, even though she passed away in 1995. A reader sent me info on co-s connected to this address. Interestingly enough, it is American Health Foudation, that is connected to Ford Foundation and Rockafeller foundation...What can be the connection? Trilateral commission comes to mind
All those businesses listed in in that building MUST be some how interconnected. 320 E 43rd St
New York, NY 10017
addr.320 E 43rd St
New York, NY 10017At this address:
American Health Foundation
Congressional Research Service
Cushman & Wakefield Inc
Ford Foundation
Investment Research Library
Office of Communications
State of New York Parks Recreation & Historic Preservation
State of Ny http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=American+Health+Foundation%26%238206%3B%2C+320+E+43rd+St%2C+new+york&btnG=Search
Here is a PDF file for the American Health Foundation, note that it is stamped by the Rockefellor Foundation and they are meeting at the Ford Foundation. Our former Secr. of Defense, Donald H. Rumsfeld is also listed as the President and CEO (left hand column of PDF) of Searle & Company. What does all this mean?? How big is this? I'm in the process of researching the other company's. Please help.
All those businesses listed in in that building MUST be some how interconnected. 320 E 43rd St
New York, NY 10017
addr.320 E 43rd St
New York, NY 10017At this address:
American Health Foundation
Congressional Research Service
Cushman & Wakefield Inc
Ford Foundation
Investment Research Library
Office of Communications
State of New York Parks Recreation & Historic Preservation
State of Ny http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=American+Health+Foundation%26%238206%3B%2C+320+E+43rd+St%2C+new+york&btnG=Search
Here is a PDF file for the American Health Foundation, note that it is stamped by the Rockefellor Foundation and they are meeting at the Ford Foundation. Our former Secr. of Defense, Donald H. Rumsfeld is also listed as the President and CEO (left hand column of PDF) of Searle & Company. What does all this mean?? How big is this? I'm in the process of researching the other company's. Please help.
Florida, like all the other states admits that nobody vetted Obama's eligibility and recommends to go to court
Hi,
Can you forward this email to the parties in the Florida Obama Case.
This is prime evidence from their General Counsel.
Thanks J
From: McDuffie, Doris [mailto:DMcDuffie@dos.state.fl.us] On Behalf Of Secretary of State
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 9:15 AM
To: Dwight Meeks
Subject: RE: Obama is a citizen but not a natural born citizen
Mr. Meeks:
Thank you for inquiring about the determination of a candidate's eligibility to run for President of United States. The Florida Department of State does not have investigative or enforcement authority to ensure that major partiesʼ Presidential candidates are properly qualified to be President of the United States. The U.S. Constitution establishes the qualifying requirements for President. Under Florida law, the way in which a major party's candidate is placed on the ballot is that the state executive committee of each political party submits its slate of presidential electors for its candidate before September 1st of each presidential election year; then, by law, the names of candidates are printed on the ballot. Those candidates are not required to provide any documents to the State that they meet the qualifications for office.
The Florida Secretary of State performs only a ministerial function. So, the Secretary has no authority or responsibility to look beyond the filing documents to determine if a candidate is eligible. If a candidate (or the party in the case of a major political party nominating someone as a Presidential candidate) files the necessary paperwork, which papers are complete on their face, the Secretary must qualify the candidate.
Any challenge to the qualifications of a U.S. Presidential candidate should be made in a court of competent jurisdiction. The Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., may also be a resource for information or inquiry on this matter. Contact information for the Department of Justice is: AskDOJ@usdoj.gov.; phone: 202-514-2000; and U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW. Washington, DC 20530-0001.
I hope you find this information helpful.
Charlotte Wheeler
General Counsel Office
R.A. Gray Building
500 S. Bronough St
Tallahassee FL 32399
(850) 245-6536
cawheeler@dos.state.fl.us
Florida Department of State
Office of the Secretary of State
R.A. Gray Building
500 South Bronough Street
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250
Telephone: (850) 245-6500
Fascimile: (850) 245-6125
Website: www.dos.state.fl.us
Please take a few minutes to provide feedback on the quality of service you received from our staff. The Florida Department of State values your feedback as a customer. Kurt Browning, Florida’s Secretary of State, is committed to continuously assessing and improving the level and quality of services provided to you. Simply click on the link to the "DOS Customer Satisfaction Survey." Thank you in advance for your participation. DOS Customer Satisfaction Survey
From: Dwight Meeks [mailto:dmeeks3@cfl.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 12:21 AM
To: Secretary of State
Subject: Obama is a citizen but not a natural born citizen
Importance: High
There is a case before supreme court Clarence Thomas that says Obama is Not a Natural born citizen because his father was a citizen of England.
Meaning even though he was born in Hawaii he had a father of another country.
Our founding fathers meant for all presidents to be a natural born citizen meaning both Father and mother natural born.
With the fact his dad isn’t natural born then it would put Obama with dual citizenship which he has confessed on his website.
My request is that you do not allow the electorate to vote and wait for Supreme Court Decision that is posted with Clarence Thomas
Can you forward this email to the parties in the Florida Obama Case.
This is prime evidence from their General Counsel.
Thanks J
From: McDuffie, Doris [mailto:DMcDuffie@dos.state.fl.us] On Behalf Of Secretary of State
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 9:15 AM
To: Dwight Meeks
Subject: RE: Obama is a citizen but not a natural born citizen
Mr. Meeks:
Thank you for inquiring about the determination of a candidate's eligibility to run for President of United States. The Florida Department of State does not have investigative or enforcement authority to ensure that major partiesʼ Presidential candidates are properly qualified to be President of the United States. The U.S. Constitution establishes the qualifying requirements for President. Under Florida law, the way in which a major party's candidate is placed on the ballot is that the state executive committee of each political party submits its slate of presidential electors for its candidate before September 1st of each presidential election year; then, by law, the names of candidates are printed on the ballot. Those candidates are not required to provide any documents to the State that they meet the qualifications for office.
The Florida Secretary of State performs only a ministerial function. So, the Secretary has no authority or responsibility to look beyond the filing documents to determine if a candidate is eligible. If a candidate (or the party in the case of a major political party nominating someone as a Presidential candidate) files the necessary paperwork, which papers are complete on their face, the Secretary must qualify the candidate.
Any challenge to the qualifications of a U.S. Presidential candidate should be made in a court of competent jurisdiction. The Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., may also be a resource for information or inquiry on this matter. Contact information for the Department of Justice is: AskDOJ@usdoj.gov.; phone: 202-514-2000; and U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW. Washington, DC 20530-0001.
I hope you find this information helpful.
Charlotte Wheeler
General Counsel Office
R.A. Gray Building
500 S. Bronough St
Tallahassee FL 32399
(850) 245-6536
cawheeler@dos.state.fl.us
Florida Department of State
Office of the Secretary of State
R.A. Gray Building
500 South Bronough Street
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250
Telephone: (850) 245-6500
Fascimile: (850) 245-6125
Website: www.dos.state.fl.us
Please take a few minutes to provide feedback on the quality of service you received from our staff. The Florida Department of State values your feedback as a customer. Kurt Browning, Florida’s Secretary of State, is committed to continuously assessing and improving the level and quality of services provided to you. Simply click on the link to the "DOS Customer Satisfaction Survey." Thank you in advance for your participation. DOS Customer Satisfaction Survey
From: Dwight Meeks [mailto:dmeeks3@cfl.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 12:21 AM
To: Secretary of State
Subject: Obama is a citizen but not a natural born citizen
Importance: High
There is a case before supreme court Clarence Thomas that says Obama is Not a Natural born citizen because his father was a citizen of England.
Meaning even though he was born in Hawaii he had a father of another country.
Our founding fathers meant for all presidents to be a natural born citizen meaning both Father and mother natural born.
With the fact his dad isn’t natural born then it would put Obama with dual citizenship which he has confessed on his website.
My request is that you do not allow the electorate to vote and wait for Supreme Court Decision that is posted with Clarence Thomas
Letter from a reader
I wanted to send a note out to thank everyone for allowing me to be a part
of the Conference Call (THURSDAY) 12-18-08.
It was an honor & pleasure to be able to share my experiance with you all
&
the callers as well.
I am continueing the effort to get the Senator Snopes story out there &
have
contacted (choke, gag, cough) Senator John McCain & some media about it,
but
I am not done yet.
Yes, it was hard for me to call John McCain, Senator or even use his name
because I know he should be the one leading this fight & when America needs
him most, he has turned his back on her.
He has gone from Hero to Zero in my book.
Thank you all again & thank you so very much for taking a stand to try to
save America from this disaster. You are all Patriots & Heros & I know
God
will keep you safe & help you win this battle.
Merry Christmas & God Bless.
Stephen Lumpkin
of the Conference Call (THURSDAY) 12-18-08.
It was an honor & pleasure to be able to share my experiance with you all
&
the callers as well.
I am continueing the effort to get the Senator Snopes story out there &
have
contacted (choke, gag, cough) Senator John McCain & some media about it,
but
I am not done yet.
Yes, it was hard for me to call John McCain, Senator or even use his name
because I know he should be the one leading this fight & when America needs
him most, he has turned his back on her.
He has gone from Hero to Zero in my book.
Thank you all again & thank you so very much for taking a stand to try to
save America from this disaster. You are all Patriots & Heros & I know
God
will keep you safe & help you win this battle.
Merry Christmas & God Bless.
Stephen Lumpkin
Obama on Governor Blagojevich/Rahm Emanuel
Judicial Watch's President Tom Fitton wrote:
The Blagojevich scandal is not going to go away. The Chicago Tribune reported last Saturday that "communications between [incoming White House Chief of Staff Rahm] Emanuel and the Blagojevich administration were captured on court-approved wiretaps." Moreover, it appears Emanuel, at Obama's urging, presented Blagojevich's representatives with a list of preferred Senate appointees.
Of course, neither Obama nor Emanuel are commenting on any of this, hiding behind the old "I'm not going to comment on an ongoing investigation" line. Obama even told one reporter who dared ask about the scandal earlier this week "don't waste your question." (You can watch the video here and below.) So much for openness, integrity and transparency. More information may be dumped over Christmas, so stay alert.
YouTube - Obama on Governor Blagojevich/Rahm Emanuel
Read more here.
Petitions to senators
We can change things on this, if need be. It has the maximum characters that are allowed on the petition so the bottom statement after the letter would not fit. It is set up so I will be able to sort by state. Please distribute to everyone to sign.
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/OurConstitution/index.html
Lyn
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without bloodshed,
If you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly,
You may come to the moment when you will have to fight
with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival."
--Winston Churchill
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/OurConstitution/index.html
Lyn
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without bloodshed,
If you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly,
You may come to the moment when you will have to fight
with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival."
--Winston Churchill
Friday, December 19, 2008
21 first Lawsuit against Obama
21 st law suit was filed against Obama Connerat v Browning, challenging election results in Florida, due to the fact that Obama is not eligible.
Yet again our corrupt main streem media didn't cover a thing.
Yet again our corrupt main streem media didn't cover a thing.
From Governor of Missouri-Obama's behavior is scandalous
Please, everybody
We all need to contact this governor. If he agrees to file a legal action, we can gather all challenges from all over the country and go directly to the Supreme Court. We will also have a necessary media exposure. When a Governor of the State files, we will have an original jurisdiction in the Supreme Court
Please, everybody call and fax and write to him ASAP. We need him as a plaintiff
Orly
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Saturday, September 27, 2008
Contact: Jessica Robinson, 573-751-0290
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign’s Abusive Use of Missouri Law Enforcement
JEFFERSON CITY - Gov. Matt Blunt today issued the following statement on news reports that have exposed plans by U.S. Senator Barack Obama to use Missouri law enforcement to threaten and intimidate his critics.
“St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer, and Obama and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Claire McCaskill have attached the stench of police state tactics to the Obama-Biden campaign.
“What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.
“This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson’s thinking than using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation about the election.
“Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in the press constantly say false things about me and my family. Usually, we ignore false and scurrilous accusations because the purveyors have no credibility. When necessary, we refute them. Enlisting Missouri law enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent of the Sedition Acts - not a free society.”
Email Governor Blunt. Remember that the Governor will pay more attention to constituents than nonconstituents. And be polite!
Address:
Office of the Governor
Room 216, State Capitol Building
Jefferson City MO 65101
Telephone: (573) 751-3222
Fax: (573) 526-3291
mogov@mail.state.mo.us
Senior Staff
Trish Vincent, Chief of Staff (573) 751-5261
Chuck Pryor, Deputy Chief of Staff - Policy (573) 751-2982
John Russell, Deputy Chief of Staff - Administration (573) 751-5261
Rich Chrismer, Deputy Chief of Staff - Communications (573) 751-0290
Lowell Pearson, General Counsel (573) 751-5218
Jody Larison, Director of Legislative Affairs (573) 751-2982
Rod Nunn, Director, Education and Workforce Innovation (573) 751-6806
Tom Reiss, Director of Boards and Commissions (573) 751-2019
Mike Ussery, Director of Constituent Services (573) 751-5293
Carolyn Loethen, Director of Scheduling (573) 751-3816
Mary Craven, Special Assistant to the First Lady (573) 751-4141
We all need to contact this governor. If he agrees to file a legal action, we can gather all challenges from all over the country and go directly to the Supreme Court. We will also have a necessary media exposure. When a Governor of the State files, we will have an original jurisdiction in the Supreme Court
Please, everybody call and fax and write to him ASAP. We need him as a plaintiff
Orly
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Saturday, September 27, 2008
Contact: Jessica Robinson, 573-751-0290
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign’s Abusive Use of Missouri Law Enforcement
JEFFERSON CITY - Gov. Matt Blunt today issued the following statement on news reports that have exposed plans by U.S. Senator Barack Obama to use Missouri law enforcement to threaten and intimidate his critics.
“St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer, and Obama and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Claire McCaskill have attached the stench of police state tactics to the Obama-Biden campaign.
“What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.
“This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson’s thinking than using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation about the election.
“Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in the press constantly say false things about me and my family. Usually, we ignore false and scurrilous accusations because the purveyors have no credibility. When necessary, we refute them. Enlisting Missouri law enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent of the Sedition Acts - not a free society.”
Email Governor Blunt. Remember that the Governor will pay more attention to constituents than nonconstituents. And be polite!
Address:
Office of the Governor
Room 216, State Capitol Building
Jefferson City MO 65101
Telephone: (573) 751-3222
Fax: (573) 526-3291
mogov@mail.state.mo.us
Senior Staff
Trish Vincent, Chief of Staff (573) 751-5261
Chuck Pryor, Deputy Chief of Staff - Policy (573) 751-2982
John Russell, Deputy Chief of Staff - Administration (573) 751-5261
Rich Chrismer, Deputy Chief of Staff - Communications (573) 751-0290
Lowell Pearson, General Counsel (573) 751-5218
Jody Larison, Director of Legislative Affairs (573) 751-2982
Rod Nunn, Director, Education and Workforce Innovation (573) 751-6806
Tom Reiss, Director of Boards and Commissions (573) 751-2019
Mike Ussery, Director of Constituent Services (573) 751-5293
Carolyn Loethen, Director of Scheduling (573) 751-3816
Mary Craven, Special Assistant to the First Lady (573) 751-4141
Letter from a reader, sample complaint to the Illinois bar against Obama
Only sent to people with suits. If you want this posted tell me where and I will post it now. You can then tell your friends to go to that site.
If I do post it, I will tell you where.
Don Maccank
_______________________________________________________________
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMPLAINT AGAINST BARACK OBAMA:
FILL OUT THE FORMAL COMPLAINT WITH YOUR INFORMATION
FILL OUT A COPY OF THE COVER SHEET
FAX A COPY TO CLERKS OFFICE BELOW AND SEND BY CERTIFIED MAIL
HE HAS 14 DAYS TO ANSWER-HE WILL GIVE UP HIS LICENSE AND NOT ANSWER
YOU HAVE STANDING BECAUSE HE CAME INTO YOUR STATE AND SWORE TO YOUR SOS THAT HE WAS A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN
I'LL BET YOU EVEN DONATED $20 TO HIS ELECTION FUND WITH A DEBIT CARD YOU COULD ADD THAT IN AT THE END OF #12 …and that I was defrauded and encouraged to donate even more subsatnatial sums of money to his campaign.
https://www.iardc.org/htr_reqforinvestig_form.html
https://www.iardc.org/co_clerksofcsvc.html#1
Illinois attorney board for complaints
https://www.iardc.org/ardcroll.asp
Obama law license
http://www.clr.org/cjg.html
example of Ilinois complaint
http://www.iardc.org/rulesSCT.html
rules governing legal profession in Ilinois
http://www.state.il.us/court/supremecourt/rules/art_viii/
RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
The Clerk's Office is located in the Commission's Chicago office at 130 East Randolph Drive, Suite 1100. The Clerk's office open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., on all days except Saturday, Sunday and Commission holidays. You may contact the Clerk's Office by telephone at the Commission's general phone number (312) 565-2600, or within Illinois, at 800-826-8625. The Clerk's Office facsimile number is (312) 565-1806.
_____________________________________________________________________________BEFORE THE HEARING BOARD
OF THE
ILLINOIS ATTORNEY REGISTRATION
AND
DISIPLINARY COMMISSION
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Petitioner Case No. To Be Assigned
vs (See Note 1 and 2)
Barack Hussein Obama
Attorney Respondent.
,
FORMAL COMPLAINT
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Petitioner, upon information and belief, states the following:
COUNT ONE
1. Respondent, Barack Hussein Obama, claims to be licensed to practice law in Illinois in 2008, and by virtue of alleged license is a member of the State Bar of Illinois who is subject to the jurisdiction of the Illinois Supreme Court and the Attorney Registration and Disiplinary Commission in matters of discipline for professional misconduct.
2. Respondent last maintained an office for the practice of law in the County of Cook, Illinois State.
3. As an attorney subject to the rules and regulations of the Illinois Supreme Court, respondent is subject to the standards for discipline set forth in Article Vlll of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct.
4. As attorney subject to the rules and regulations of the Illinois Supreme Court, respondent is charged, with the following duties and responsibilities:
a. To refrain from engaging in conduct prejudicial to the proper administration of justice;
b. To refrain from engaging in conduct contrary to justice, ethics, honesty, or good morals;
c. To refrain from engaging in conduct that subjects the legal profession to obloquy, contempt, censure, or reproach.
COUNT ONE
5. On or about December 17, 1991, Barack Hussein Obama was admitted to practice law in the State of Illinois. On his Bar Admission Application he stated that he was born in Hawaii when in fact he was born in Kenya, Africa. At no time has Barack Husseim Obama attempt to correct his mistakes or to inform the Commission or Courts of his dishonesty.
6. By reason of the conduct outlined above, Respondent has engaged in the following misconduct:
a. conduct that violated Rule 8.1 (a)(1 and (2) Bar Admissiom and Disciplinary Matters of the Rules of Professional Conduct;and
b. conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice in violation of Rule 8.4(a)(5) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct; and
c. conduct which tends to defeat the administration of justice, or to bring the courts or legal profession into disrepute, in violation of Supreme Court Rule 771: and
d. Including, but not limited to, these laws including Obstruction of Justice, RICO, racketeering laws, laws against filing false information in the public records, laws against fraud upon the Court, negligence, and The Penal Code making it a felony for a public official (officer of the Court)to violate offenses at common law ie. Obstruction of Justice (Blackstones , Commentaries(1890),pp(161-177):
1. Perjury
2. Barretry
COUNT TWO
8. Petitioner re-alleges, as if recited verbatim, the factual statements set forth in Count One of this Complaint.
9. On or about December 17, 1991, Barack Hussein Obama was admitted to practice law in the State of Illinois. On his Bar Admission Application he did not declare that he was also known as A/K/A: Barry Soetoro; Barry Obama; Barack Dunham; and Barry Dunham. At no time has Barack Husseim Obama attempt to correct his mistakes or to inform the Commission or Courts of his dishonesty. Furthermore, these A/K/A names were used on passports and college applications to receive foreign student aid.
10. By reason of the conduct outlined above, Respondent has engaged in the following misconduct:
a. conduct that violated Rule 8.1 (a)(1 and (2) Bar Admissiom and Disciplinary Matters of the Rules of Professional Conduct;and
b. conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice in violation of Rule 8.4(a)(5) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct; and
c. conduct which tends to defeat the administration of justice, or to bring the courts or legal profession into disrepute, in violation of Supreme Court Rule 771: and
d. Including, but not limited to, these laws including Obstruction of Justice, RICO, racketeering laws, laws against filing false information in the public records, laws against fraud upon the Court, negligence, and The Penal Code making it a felony for a public official (officer of the Court)to violate offenses at common law ie. Obstruction of Justice (Blackstones , Commentaries(1890),pp(161-177):
1. Perjury
2. Barretry
COUNT THREE
11. Petitioner re-alleges, as if recited verbatim, the factual statements set forth in Count One and Two of this complaint.
12. During 2008, Barack Hussein Obama declared to 50 Secretary of States , including Illinois, that he was eligible to run for the office of the Presidency of the United States and was a "natural born citizen" even though it was common knowledge that his father was a Kenyan citizen.
Barack Obamas 2008 Presidential website clearly states that he had dual citizenship and his father was a Kenyan/British citizen. This is a violation of the US Constitution Article ll, Section l, Clause 5.
13. By reason of the conduct outlined above, Respondent has engaged in the following misconduct:
a. conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice in violation of Rule 8.4(a)(5) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct; and
b. conduct which tends to defeat the administration of justice, or to bring the courts or legal profession into disrepute, in violation of Supreme Court Rule 771: and
c. Including, but not limited to, these laws including Obstruction of Justice, RICO, racketeering laws, laws against filing false information in the public records, laws against fraud upon the Court, negligence, and The Penal Code making it a felony for a public official (officer of the Court)to violate offenses at common law ie. Obstruction of Justice (Blackstones , Commentaries(1890),pp(161-177):
1. Perjury
2. Barretry
COUNT FOUR
15. Petitioner re-alleges, as if recited verbatim, the factual statements set forth in Count One through Three of this complaint.
16. That these representations made by Respondent were false, and were known to Respondent to be false at the time they were made. "Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional Right from liability. For they are deemed to know the law." Owen v Independence 100 S.C.T. 1398
17. That Respondent acting in concert with other state actors, by slander, impersonating a state official, bias, intimidation, fraud, mail fraud, unauthorized practice of law, have violated Petitioner's Constitutional Rights, as well Unfair Trade Practice Laws and the Consumer Protection Act Laws and barratry.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
18. A Temporary Restraining Order restraining Respondent from exercising any duties of any state or federal office held, or the practice of law, pending disposition of this Petition.
19. That Respondent be denied any and all emoluments he may have been entitled to.
20. That the Respondent be declared in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. {{} {} 2382, and 2384 and the 14th Amendment, {}3 of the Constitution of the United States of America.
21. All other relief that Petitioner is entitled to pursuant to F.R.C.P. 54(c)
22. Any and all other relief that the Court deems equitable and just in the interest of justice.
23. Whoever, having taken an Oath before a competent tribunal officer or person in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an Oath to be administered, wilfully and contrary to such Oath, states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true, is guilty of perjury and shall be fined no more than $2,000.00 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
Wherefore, Respondent should be subjected to such discipline as may be warranted by the facts and circumstance of such misconduct.
Dated December 19, 2008
Anywhere, USA xxxxx
XXXXXXXXXXXX
c/o 123 Oak St
Anywhere, USA
XXXXX
COMPLAINT
Note 1
Lawyers and judges are required to file a request for investigation if they have knowledge of "A significant violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to (a) Lawyer's honesty, trust, worthiness, or fitness as a lawyer ..."
COMPLAINT
Note 2
There is no statute of limitation or any concept of latches as a bar to prosecution. ABA Standards for Lawyer Discipline and Disability Proceedings Standard 4.6(1979) states that "Lawyer discipline and disability proceedings should not be subject to any statute of limitations." In Re Smith, 73 Kan 743; Anne Arundel Cty Bar Ass'n v Collins 272 MD 578; State Ex Rel Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v Bates 162 Neb 652 and in Re O'Hara, 63 AD 2nd 500 (1978).
COVER SHEET FOR FORMAL COMPLAINT
IN THE DETAILS AREA SAY "SEE ATTACHED" OR N/A
STREET ADDRESS, COOK COUNTY, IL
Filing a Request for an Investigation of an Attorney | Effect on Your Legal Rights | Other Information Provided by the ARDC
REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION OF A LAWYER FORM
Request an investigation of an Illinois lawyer by printing, completing and returning this form to the Chicago or Springfield ARDC offices. The Chicago office is located at 130 East Randolph Drive, Suite 1500, 60601-6219. The Springfield office is located at the One North Old Capitol Plaza, Suite 333, 62701-1625.
1. Your name: ____________________________________________
Street Address: ____________________________________________
City: _____________________ State: _____ Zip: ________________
Home Phone Number: ________________________________
Cell Phone Number: __________________________________
Business Phone Number: _______________________________
2. Name of Lawyer you are complaining about: __________________________________
Name of Law Firm: _____________________________________________________
Street Address: ________________________________________________________
City: ____________________ State: _____ Zip: ___________________
Phone Number: _______________________________
3. Did you employ the lawyer?
Yes _____
If yes, when was the lawyer hired? ______________________
How much did you pay for the lawyer? ___________________
No _____
If no, what is your connection to the lawyer? _________________________
4. If your complaint relates to a lawsuit, please give the following:
Name of court (for example: Circuit Court of Cook County): ________________________________________________________________
Name of case: _____________________________________________________
Case number: ______________________________________________________
5. Please describe what the lawyer did or failed to do that you believe may have been improper. If you employed the lawyer, explain what you employed the lawyer to do. Include important dates and names, addresses and telephone numbers of witnesses and other people involved. Do not include opinions or arguments. Attach copies of any documents that support your complaint, such as fee agreements, receipts, checks, letters and court papers._____________________
Date: ____________________ Signature: __________________________________________
If I do post it, I will tell you where.
Don Maccank
_______________________________________________________________
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMPLAINT AGAINST BARACK OBAMA:
FILL OUT THE FORMAL COMPLAINT WITH YOUR INFORMATION
FILL OUT A COPY OF THE COVER SHEET
FAX A COPY TO CLERKS OFFICE BELOW AND SEND BY CERTIFIED MAIL
HE HAS 14 DAYS TO ANSWER-HE WILL GIVE UP HIS LICENSE AND NOT ANSWER
YOU HAVE STANDING BECAUSE HE CAME INTO YOUR STATE AND SWORE TO YOUR SOS THAT HE WAS A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN
I'LL BET YOU EVEN DONATED $20 TO HIS ELECTION FUND WITH A DEBIT CARD YOU COULD ADD THAT IN AT THE END OF #12 …and that I was defrauded and encouraged to donate even more subsatnatial sums of money to his campaign.
https://www.iardc.org/htr_reqforinvestig_form.html
https://www.iardc.org/co_clerksofcsvc.html#1
Illinois attorney board for complaints
https://www.iardc.org/ardcroll.asp
Obama law license
http://www.clr.org/cjg.html
example of Ilinois complaint
http://www.iardc.org/rulesSCT.html
rules governing legal profession in Ilinois
http://www.state.il.us/court/supremecourt/rules/art_viii/
RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
The Clerk's Office is located in the Commission's Chicago office at 130 East Randolph Drive, Suite 1100. The Clerk's office open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., on all days except Saturday, Sunday and Commission holidays. You may contact the Clerk's Office by telephone at the Commission's general phone number (312) 565-2600, or within Illinois, at 800-826-8625. The Clerk's Office facsimile number is (312) 565-1806.
_____________________________________________________________________________BEFORE THE HEARING BOARD
OF THE
ILLINOIS ATTORNEY REGISTRATION
AND
DISIPLINARY COMMISSION
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Petitioner Case No. To Be Assigned
vs (See Note 1 and 2)
Barack Hussein Obama
Attorney Respondent.
,
FORMAL COMPLAINT
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Petitioner, upon information and belief, states the following:
COUNT ONE
1. Respondent, Barack Hussein Obama, claims to be licensed to practice law in Illinois in 2008, and by virtue of alleged license is a member of the State Bar of Illinois who is subject to the jurisdiction of the Illinois Supreme Court and the Attorney Registration and Disiplinary Commission in matters of discipline for professional misconduct.
2. Respondent last maintained an office for the practice of law in the County of Cook, Illinois State.
3. As an attorney subject to the rules and regulations of the Illinois Supreme Court, respondent is subject to the standards for discipline set forth in Article Vlll of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct.
4. As attorney subject to the rules and regulations of the Illinois Supreme Court, respondent is charged, with the following duties and responsibilities:
a. To refrain from engaging in conduct prejudicial to the proper administration of justice;
b. To refrain from engaging in conduct contrary to justice, ethics, honesty, or good morals;
c. To refrain from engaging in conduct that subjects the legal profession to obloquy, contempt, censure, or reproach.
COUNT ONE
5. On or about December 17, 1991, Barack Hussein Obama was admitted to practice law in the State of Illinois. On his Bar Admission Application he stated that he was born in Hawaii when in fact he was born in Kenya, Africa. At no time has Barack Husseim Obama attempt to correct his mistakes or to inform the Commission or Courts of his dishonesty.
6. By reason of the conduct outlined above, Respondent has engaged in the following misconduct:
a. conduct that violated Rule 8.1 (a)(1 and (2) Bar Admissiom and Disciplinary Matters of the Rules of Professional Conduct;and
b. conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice in violation of Rule 8.4(a)(5) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct; and
c. conduct which tends to defeat the administration of justice, or to bring the courts or legal profession into disrepute, in violation of Supreme Court Rule 771: and
d. Including, but not limited to, these laws including Obstruction of Justice, RICO, racketeering laws, laws against filing false information in the public records, laws against fraud upon the Court, negligence, and The Penal Code making it a felony for a public official (officer of the Court)to violate offenses at common law ie. Obstruction of Justice (Blackstones , Commentaries(1890),pp(161-177):
1. Perjury
2. Barretry
COUNT TWO
8. Petitioner re-alleges, as if recited verbatim, the factual statements set forth in Count One of this Complaint.
9. On or about December 17, 1991, Barack Hussein Obama was admitted to practice law in the State of Illinois. On his Bar Admission Application he did not declare that he was also known as A/K/A: Barry Soetoro; Barry Obama; Barack Dunham; and Barry Dunham. At no time has Barack Husseim Obama attempt to correct his mistakes or to inform the Commission or Courts of his dishonesty. Furthermore, these A/K/A names were used on passports and college applications to receive foreign student aid.
10. By reason of the conduct outlined above, Respondent has engaged in the following misconduct:
a. conduct that violated Rule 8.1 (a)(1 and (2) Bar Admissiom and Disciplinary Matters of the Rules of Professional Conduct;and
b. conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice in violation of Rule 8.4(a)(5) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct; and
c. conduct which tends to defeat the administration of justice, or to bring the courts or legal profession into disrepute, in violation of Supreme Court Rule 771: and
d. Including, but not limited to, these laws including Obstruction of Justice, RICO, racketeering laws, laws against filing false information in the public records, laws against fraud upon the Court, negligence, and The Penal Code making it a felony for a public official (officer of the Court)to violate offenses at common law ie. Obstruction of Justice (Blackstones , Commentaries(1890),pp(161-177):
1. Perjury
2. Barretry
COUNT THREE
11. Petitioner re-alleges, as if recited verbatim, the factual statements set forth in Count One and Two of this complaint.
12. During 2008, Barack Hussein Obama declared to 50 Secretary of States , including Illinois, that he was eligible to run for the office of the Presidency of the United States and was a "natural born citizen" even though it was common knowledge that his father was a Kenyan citizen.
Barack Obamas 2008 Presidential website clearly states that he had dual citizenship and his father was a Kenyan/British citizen. This is a violation of the US Constitution Article ll, Section l, Clause 5.
13. By reason of the conduct outlined above, Respondent has engaged in the following misconduct:
a. conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice in violation of Rule 8.4(a)(5) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct; and
b. conduct which tends to defeat the administration of justice, or to bring the courts or legal profession into disrepute, in violation of Supreme Court Rule 771: and
c. Including, but not limited to, these laws including Obstruction of Justice, RICO, racketeering laws, laws against filing false information in the public records, laws against fraud upon the Court, negligence, and The Penal Code making it a felony for a public official (officer of the Court)to violate offenses at common law ie. Obstruction of Justice (Blackstones , Commentaries(1890),pp(161-177):
1. Perjury
2. Barretry
COUNT FOUR
15. Petitioner re-alleges, as if recited verbatim, the factual statements set forth in Count One through Three of this complaint.
16. That these representations made by Respondent were false, and were known to Respondent to be false at the time they were made. "Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional Right from liability. For they are deemed to know the law." Owen v Independence 100 S.C.T. 1398
17. That Respondent acting in concert with other state actors, by slander, impersonating a state official, bias, intimidation, fraud, mail fraud, unauthorized practice of law, have violated Petitioner's Constitutional Rights, as well Unfair Trade Practice Laws and the Consumer Protection Act Laws and barratry.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
18. A Temporary Restraining Order restraining Respondent from exercising any duties of any state or federal office held, or the practice of law, pending disposition of this Petition.
19. That Respondent be denied any and all emoluments he may have been entitled to.
20. That the Respondent be declared in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. {{} {} 2382, and 2384 and the 14th Amendment, {}3 of the Constitution of the United States of America.
21. All other relief that Petitioner is entitled to pursuant to F.R.C.P. 54(c)
22. Any and all other relief that the Court deems equitable and just in the interest of justice.
23. Whoever, having taken an Oath before a competent tribunal officer or person in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an Oath to be administered, wilfully and contrary to such Oath, states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true, is guilty of perjury and shall be fined no more than $2,000.00 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
Wherefore, Respondent should be subjected to such discipline as may be warranted by the facts and circumstance of such misconduct.
Dated December 19, 2008
Anywhere, USA xxxxx
XXXXXXXXXXXX
c/o 123 Oak St
Anywhere, USA
XXXXX
COMPLAINT
Note 1
Lawyers and judges are required to file a request for investigation if they have knowledge of "A significant violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to (a) Lawyer's honesty, trust, worthiness, or fitness as a lawyer ..."
COMPLAINT
Note 2
There is no statute of limitation or any concept of latches as a bar to prosecution. ABA Standards for Lawyer Discipline and Disability Proceedings Standard 4.6(1979) states that "Lawyer discipline and disability proceedings should not be subject to any statute of limitations." In Re Smith, 73 Kan 743; Anne Arundel Cty Bar Ass'n v Collins 272 MD 578; State Ex Rel Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v Bates 162 Neb 652 and in Re O'Hara, 63 AD 2nd 500 (1978).
COVER SHEET FOR FORMAL COMPLAINT
IN THE DETAILS AREA SAY "SEE ATTACHED" OR N/A
STREET ADDRESS, COOK COUNTY, IL
Filing a Request for an Investigation of an Attorney | Effect on Your Legal Rights | Other Information Provided by the ARDC
REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION OF A LAWYER FORM
Request an investigation of an Illinois lawyer by printing, completing and returning this form to the Chicago or Springfield ARDC offices. The Chicago office is located at 130 East Randolph Drive, Suite 1500, 60601-6219. The Springfield office is located at the One North Old Capitol Plaza, Suite 333, 62701-1625.
1. Your name: ____________________________________________
Street Address: ____________________________________________
City: _____________________ State: _____ Zip: ________________
Home Phone Number: ________________________________
Cell Phone Number: __________________________________
Business Phone Number: _______________________________
2. Name of Lawyer you are complaining about: __________________________________
Name of Law Firm: _____________________________________________________
Street Address: ________________________________________________________
City: ____________________ State: _____ Zip: ___________________
Phone Number: _______________________________
3. Did you employ the lawyer?
Yes _____
If yes, when was the lawyer hired? ______________________
How much did you pay for the lawyer? ___________________
No _____
If no, what is your connection to the lawyer? _________________________
4. If your complaint relates to a lawsuit, please give the following:
Name of court (for example: Circuit Court of Cook County): ________________________________________________________________
Name of case: _____________________________________________________
Case number: ______________________________________________________
5. Please describe what the lawyer did or failed to do that you believe may have been improper. If you employed the lawyer, explain what you employed the lawyer to do. Include important dates and names, addresses and telephone numbers of witnesses and other people involved. Do not include opinions or arguments. Attach copies of any documents that support your complaint, such as fee agreements, receipts, checks, letters and court papers._____________________
Date: ____________________ Signature: __________________________________________
Soetoro Divorce papers
Dr. Taitz,
In case you haven’t seen this, some Soetero Divorce papers were posted at this link (it’s pdf so you’ll have to download it). May the Lord bless you for all your work.
http://www.therightsideoflifeDr. Taitz,
In case you haven’t seen this, some Soetero Divorce papers were posted at this link (it’s pdf so you’ll have to download it). May the Lord bless you for all your work.
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=2043 .com/?p=2043
In case you haven’t seen this, some Soetero Divorce papers were posted at this link (it’s pdf so you’ll have to download it). May the Lord bless you for all your work.
http://www.therightsideoflifeDr. Taitz,
In case you haven’t seen this, some Soetero Divorce papers were posted at this link (it’s pdf so you’ll have to download it). May the Lord bless you for all your work.
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=2043 .com/?p=2043
No verification of legal name- Immediate subpoenas needed
Please write open letters to US attorney for Northern Illinois Patrick Fitzgerald, US att Mike Mukasey, director of FBI Robert Muller, + 9 Supremes+50 Att. Gen-s+ 455 Congressmen+100 Senators. Record your open letters on video and forward the letters and video.
We, the people demand to know immediately, what is Obama's legal name and any and all names and alieses. Is it Barry Soetoro, Barry Sutoro, Barry Toot, Barack Obama, Barack Hussein Obama? We demand to know any and all citizenships under all of these names, any and all criminal records under these names. We demand immediate subpoenas issued by the US att. office and offices of all the att.gen-ls for production of original BC+ any and all passports+ immigration and travel records+ school and university records
Sincerely
Orly Taitz
Dr Orly,
Please establish "reasonable doubt" to allow access to Obama's records with the following documents:
NEW -- Important -- please look at the index of the Ann Dunham's dissertation, "Peasant Blacksmithing in Indonesia", written in 1992, with references back to 1978.
http://rapidshare.com/files/174916246/Peasant_Blacksmithing_in_Indonesia_-_excerpts.pdf
Of significant IMPORTANCE is that she spells her last name "Sutoro" consistently in her OWN dissertation -- well-vetted by University staff and taking YEARS to write. Yet in her divorce decree that she kept going for 8 years, 1980 to 1988, Stanley Ann, Lolo and Maya (and presumably Barry) used an incorrectly spelled last name, "Soetoro." She should have had a driver's license to open the case and prove who she was.
I think this might give you "justifiable cause" in your investigations with the mother not correctly reporting last names and potentially confusing birth records, too.
Questions of aliases not disclosed, plus names not legally changed, could cause problems on Jan 8, 2009, when the EC votes are counted by Congress, and Jan 20, when Barack Obama is sworn in by his legal name by the Supreme Court Chief Justice...
Also, if you look at Debbie Schlussel's website talking about Barack Obama Jr's Selective Service application, http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/11/exclusive_did_n.html, the postage date on the Selective Service application is July 29, 1980. BUT note that the trial start date for the divorce isn't until Aug 20, 1980, at the earliest. Wrong name, and or fraud?
The divorce papers Dr. Orly referenced in a recent video for "Stanley Ann Soetoro" are on Berg's website: http://www.obamacrimes.info/justthefacts.html. There are possibly 7 documents from there you may not have. Please check for the new affidavits and other paperwork, like this (http://www.obamacrimes.info/SOETORO%20DIVORCE%20P%201-5.pdf) and (http://www.obamacrimes.info/057_7%20Affidavit%20of%20Reverend%20Kweli%20Shuhubia.pdf)
Also, this is a VERY recent article on Ann Dunham while she was in Indonenia and Pakistan, is written by her college professor an friend, Alice Dewey. "Ann Dunham -- a Personal Reflection" -- note that is subpoenas as in order, Mrs Dewey has noted on many occasions publicly she has a trove of letters from Ann Dunham and Barry Soetoro while they were overseas. http://www.anthrosource.net/na102/home/ACS/publisher/aaa/journals/production/an/2008/49/8/an.2008.49.8.20/an.2008.49.8.20.fp.png
Lastly, I leave you with one tidbit I gleaned from the divorce papers:
Case 1D00-0-17619 (117619) (Initiator ID: A1530) — Stanley Ann Soeroto vs Lolo Soetoro Divorce Ct — Initiation date: 08-20-1980 Case terminated 11-26-1988 — Attorney William H. Gilardy Jr
The attorney for Stanley Ann's divorce in 1980, "Gilardy H William Jr," went on to become Hawaii DNC state attorney, as said in this 1998 article: "High court asked to act in vote dispute" - http://archives.starbulletin.com/98/12/29/news/story3.html
Ironically, in 2006, William Gilardy is listed by name here "Who's Undoing the U.S. Constitution?" www.middleeast.org/forum/fb-public/1/4604.shtml
He's still a Lawyer, still in Hawaii: "Gilardy William H, Esq" in Honolulu, (808) 237-4100.
Restated: The attorney that helps Obama's mother get a divorce in 1980, goes on to be the DNC state attorney by 1998, listed in "Who's Undoing the U.S. Constitution?" in 2006, and is today an Esquire in Hawaii. What are the odds of that???
If I can help you further, please drop me a line anytime
Thank you, BB
We, the people demand to know immediately, what is Obama's legal name and any and all names and alieses. Is it Barry Soetoro, Barry Sutoro, Barry Toot, Barack Obama, Barack Hussein Obama? We demand to know any and all citizenships under all of these names, any and all criminal records under these names. We demand immediate subpoenas issued by the US att. office and offices of all the att.gen-ls for production of original BC+ any and all passports+ immigration and travel records+ school and university records
Sincerely
Orly Taitz
Dr Orly,
Please establish "reasonable doubt" to allow access to Obama's records with the following documents:
NEW -- Important -- please look at the index of the Ann Dunham's dissertation, "Peasant Blacksmithing in Indonesia", written in 1992, with references back to 1978.
http://rapidshare.com/files/174916246/Peasant_Blacksmithing_in_Indonesia_-_excerpts.pdf
Of significant IMPORTANCE is that she spells her last name "Sutoro" consistently in her OWN dissertation -- well-vetted by University staff and taking YEARS to write. Yet in her divorce decree that she kept going for 8 years, 1980 to 1988, Stanley Ann, Lolo and Maya (and presumably Barry) used an incorrectly spelled last name, "Soetoro." She should have had a driver's license to open the case and prove who she was.
I think this might give you "justifiable cause" in your investigations with the mother not correctly reporting last names and potentially confusing birth records, too.
Questions of aliases not disclosed, plus names not legally changed, could cause problems on Jan 8, 2009, when the EC votes are counted by Congress, and Jan 20, when Barack Obama is sworn in by his legal name by the Supreme Court Chief Justice...
Also, if you look at Debbie Schlussel's website talking about Barack Obama Jr's Selective Service application, http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/11/exclusive_did_n.html, the postage date on the Selective Service application is July 29, 1980. BUT note that the trial start date for the divorce isn't until Aug 20, 1980, at the earliest. Wrong name, and or fraud?
The divorce papers Dr. Orly referenced in a recent video for "Stanley Ann Soetoro" are on Berg's website: http://www.obamacrimes.info/justthefacts.html. There are possibly 7 documents from there you may not have. Please check for the new affidavits and other paperwork, like this (http://www.obamacrimes.info/SOETORO%20DIVORCE%20P%201-5.pdf) and (http://www.obamacrimes.info/057_7%20Affidavit%20of%20Reverend%20Kweli%20Shuhubia.pdf)
Also, this is a VERY recent article on Ann Dunham while she was in Indonenia and Pakistan, is written by her college professor an friend, Alice Dewey. "Ann Dunham -- a Personal Reflection" -- note that is subpoenas as in order, Mrs Dewey has noted on many occasions publicly she has a trove of letters from Ann Dunham and Barry Soetoro while they were overseas. http://www.anthrosource.net/na102/home/ACS/publisher/aaa/journals/production/an/2008/49/8/an.2008.49.8.20/an.2008.49.8.20.fp.png
Lastly, I leave you with one tidbit I gleaned from the divorce papers:
Case 1D00-0-17619 (117619) (Initiator ID: A1530) — Stanley Ann Soeroto vs Lolo Soetoro Divorce Ct — Initiation date: 08-20-1980 Case terminated 11-26-1988 — Attorney William H. Gilardy Jr
The attorney for Stanley Ann's divorce in 1980, "Gilardy H William Jr," went on to become Hawaii DNC state attorney, as said in this 1998 article: "High court asked to act in vote dispute" - http://archives.starbulletin.com/98/12/29/news/story3.html
Ironically, in 2006, William Gilardy is listed by name here "Who's Undoing the U.S. Constitution?" www.middleeast.org/forum/fb-public/1/4604.shtml
He's still a Lawyer, still in Hawaii: "Gilardy William H, Esq" in Honolulu, (808) 237-4100.
Restated: The attorney that helps Obama's mother get a divorce in 1980, goes on to be the DNC state attorney by 1998, listed in "Who's Undoing the U.S. Constitution?" in 2006, and is today an Esquire in Hawaii. What are the odds of that???
If I can help you further, please drop me a line anytime
Thank you, BB
5294 visited our blog yesterday, that's the rate of about 160,000 per month
I believe the radio programs and new you-tube videos have added the number of readers and visitors.
On Wednesday I spoke on 5 radio stations
WASB New York
WRSB New York
Mike Minokian - Florida
Tracy and Jeff -No Compromise WA state
Captain America- transmitting around numerous military bases all over the country
I just recorded Greg Jackson show, it will be transmitted 8-10 PM on Sunday on KBAR in CA
On Wednesday I spoke on 5 radio stations
WASB New York
WRSB New York
Mike Minokian - Florida
Tracy and Jeff -No Compromise WA state
Captain America- transmitting around numerous military bases all over the country
I just recorded Greg Jackson show, it will be transmitted 8-10 PM on Sunday on KBAR in CA
Great idea from Unalienable Rights, call federal newsRadio, demand immediate vetting of Obama
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
HI,
There's a radio station in Wa. D.C. called FederalNewRadio which I believe needs to be plagued with tons of emails to get the Obama story spread around the Wa. D.C. area. You can kisten to this radio station LIVE off of the internet.
http://www.federalnewsradio.com/
This radio station is now conducting ineterviews with individuals charged with making federal job appointments and who are required to vett ALL new employees who are being consdered for jobs
This radio station interviews many govlernment employee unions and government agencies personnel.
The attorneys who are filing lawsuits need to have exposure on this radio station, imo.
AFGE "American Federation of Government Employees" needs to begin pursuing the vetting of Obama as the transition team in Wa. D.C. is now accomplishing with the hiring of new employees who are being looked at for employment in the Oblammma admin.
The NEW employees are said to have to answer apx 65 questions and then become security cleared to hold a government job.
http://www.afge.org/index.cfm?page=PressReleases&PressReleaseID=918
HI,
There's a radio station in Wa. D.C. called FederalNewRadio which I believe needs to be plagued with tons of emails to get the Obama story spread around the Wa. D.C. area. You can kisten to this radio station LIVE off of the internet.
http://www.federalnewsradio.com/
This radio station is now conducting ineterviews with individuals charged with making federal job appointments and who are required to vett ALL new employees who are being consdered for jobs
This radio station interviews many govlernment employee unions and government agencies personnel.
The attorneys who are filing lawsuits need to have exposure on this radio station, imo.
AFGE "American Federation of Government Employees" needs to begin pursuing the vetting of Obama as the transition team in Wa. D.C. is now accomplishing with the hiring of new employees who are being looked at for employment in the Oblammma admin.
The NEW employees are said to have to answer apx 65 questions and then become security cleared to hold a government job.
http://www.afge.org/index.cfm?page=PressReleases&PressReleaseID=918
Thursday, December 18, 2008
My Message to MSM- I told you so
Recently numerous members of MSM voiced their dissatisfaction with Obama: Keith Olbertman, Rachel Madden and others. Sorry to say guys, but I told you so.
Numerous groups have blindly supported Obama, while I was telling you all along: "You are foolishly expecting more freedoms, but you will get less" This man has no track record, everything about his past is sealed, hidden, distorted and manipulated. LGBT community is upset today and felt it was thrown under the buss. I guarantee you soon enough Jewish community and all the other supporters will feel the same. I was telling you: "you can't pay attention or give any credence to flowery speeches given at the AIPAC convention, because equally flowery speeches were given to the PLO (the speeches, that were sealed and hidden by LA Times).
Let me remind you a few lessons from history. Who led the 1979 revolution in Iran? Students and intellectuals, seeking change and more freedoms. What did they get? Ayatollah Khomeini and Mahmud Ahmadinejad.(enough said) Who led the communist revolution in Russia, November 7, 1917? Students and intellectuals, seeking change and freedoms. What did they get? Stalin and Gulag.(enough said)
That is why I am saying, all of us, Right Left and Center need to join in one endeavor, one stride: demand to see this man's past, demand to see his original birth certificate that is sealed in HI, that should say the name of the hospital and the name of the doctor, so we can see if he really was born in this country. We need to demand his immediate production of documents or consent for production of his passports, immigration records and university enrollment records: so we can ascertain, what citizenship does he have? Is it American or Indonesian, Kenyan or British? All of you should demand those records on the air immediately, we can clear up this controversy in one day, once and for all.
When there is no real transparency, honesty or integrity, sooner or later every one ends up under the buss, a sacrificial lamb at the altar of one man's overinflated ego and unyielding desire for grip on power.
Orly Taitz
Numerous groups have blindly supported Obama, while I was telling you all along: "You are foolishly expecting more freedoms, but you will get less" This man has no track record, everything about his past is sealed, hidden, distorted and manipulated. LGBT community is upset today and felt it was thrown under the buss. I guarantee you soon enough Jewish community and all the other supporters will feel the same. I was telling you: "you can't pay attention or give any credence to flowery speeches given at the AIPAC convention, because equally flowery speeches were given to the PLO (the speeches, that were sealed and hidden by LA Times).
Let me remind you a few lessons from history. Who led the 1979 revolution in Iran? Students and intellectuals, seeking change and more freedoms. What did they get? Ayatollah Khomeini and Mahmud Ahmadinejad.(enough said) Who led the communist revolution in Russia, November 7, 1917? Students and intellectuals, seeking change and freedoms. What did they get? Stalin and Gulag.(enough said)
That is why I am saying, all of us, Right Left and Center need to join in one endeavor, one stride: demand to see this man's past, demand to see his original birth certificate that is sealed in HI, that should say the name of the hospital and the name of the doctor, so we can see if he really was born in this country. We need to demand his immediate production of documents or consent for production of his passports, immigration records and university enrollment records: so we can ascertain, what citizenship does he have? Is it American or Indonesian, Kenyan or British? All of you should demand those records on the air immediately, we can clear up this controversy in one day, once and for all.
When there is no real transparency, honesty or integrity, sooner or later every one ends up under the buss, a sacrificial lamb at the altar of one man's overinflated ego and unyielding desire for grip on power.
Orly Taitz
An open letter to Senator Levin
Dear Senator Levin,
Your letter to your constitutent in Washington State is in error with respect to the natural born status of Barack Hussein Obama.
Amendment 14 states in its first paragraph:
1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
Posted on Obama's website is this admission:
When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
What could be clearer than that statement from Obama's own website?
You should also note that nowhere in Amendment 14 do the words "natural born" appear. The Amendment is very careful to stay away from the term "natural born" as any change to Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution requires an Amendment to the Constitution which has been rejected many times.
The meaning of "natural born" is very clearly defined in the wording of Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution and also by The Honorable John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court in his letter to General George Washington on 25 July, 1787 suggesting the clause:
"Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government ; and to declare expressly that the command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen."
The statement, "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was previously written as, "of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty..." Both mean the same thing.
I would hope sir that you will study the issue carefully and make a correction to your constituent.
In addition, on January 8, 2009 when Congress meets to validate the vote of the Electorial College, I would hope you would rise and in unison with other Congressmen (meaning Senators as well) request that Vice President Cheney suspend the vote pending a full and complete hearing as to the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to be President of the United States.
Barack Hussein Obama does not meet the requirements to be President of the United States as defined in Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution!
Signed, Starbeau
Posted by Robert Stevens for Starbeau
Your letter to your constitutent in Washington State is in error with respect to the natural born status of Barack Hussein Obama.
Amendment 14 states in its first paragraph:
1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
Posted on Obama's website is this admission:
When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
What could be clearer than that statement from Obama's own website?
You should also note that nowhere in Amendment 14 do the words "natural born" appear. The Amendment is very careful to stay away from the term "natural born" as any change to Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution requires an Amendment to the Constitution which has been rejected many times.
The meaning of "natural born" is very clearly defined in the wording of Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution and also by The Honorable John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court in his letter to General George Washington on 25 July, 1787 suggesting the clause:
"Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government ; and to declare expressly that the command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen."
The statement, "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was previously written as, "of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty..." Both mean the same thing.
I would hope sir that you will study the issue carefully and make a correction to your constituent.
In addition, on January 8, 2009 when Congress meets to validate the vote of the Electorial College, I would hope you would rise and in unison with other Congressmen (meaning Senators as well) request that Vice President Cheney suspend the vote pending a full and complete hearing as to the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to be President of the United States.
Barack Hussein Obama does not meet the requirements to be President of the United States as defined in Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution!
Signed, Starbeau
Posted by Robert Stevens for Starbeau
America Already Knows Summary Flyer: Battle Rages Across America!
America Must Know: "Want to spread the news?
Click here to download the latest summary, print it out, and pass it out!"
Do not leave Americans with silence « td blog
Do not leave Americans with silence « td blog: "By Dr. Kate, an Exclusive for the TD Blog
TD Foreword: Dr. Kate shared with me this letter that she recently sent to Chief Justice John G. Roberts of the U.S. Supreme Court, and I asked her if I could publish it. Regular readers know that I am not optimistic that the Court will have the courage to get involved in clarifying Article II’s natural-born citizen clause in the context of Obama’s eligibility, although I believe that they should. However, I will continue to publish intelligent commentaries on the question of Obama’s eligibility, and Dr. Kate is one of the wisest contributors on the subject I’ve come across. She, as well as Judah Benjamin, will always have a home here on this blog so long as it exists.
I want to thank Dr. Kate for her patriotism, perseverance, and time-consuming research." Read more.
Pravda weighs in again
Once again, Pravda has published a far more insightful and thoughtful piece on the Obama Eligibility Controversy than any Western media source. Interesting.
Robert Stevens
Robert Stevens
Who lost their seats?
Some have suggested that contacting those members of both houses of Congress that lost their seats in the last election would be useful. These failed incumbents have nothing to risk, and can direct public attention to the Obama Eligibility Controversy. A list can be found here.
Robert Stevens
Robert Stevens
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.'s Ties To The Annenberg Foundation
A Conversation with Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. on the Origin, Nature, and Importance of the Supreme Court
The establishment of a federal judiciary was a top priority for this nation's founding fathers. In December 2006, Chief Justice of the United States John G. Roberts, Jr. and a group of high school students participated in a conversation about the high court - from its history and evolution to the methods Justices use in selecting and hearing cases to the role of an independent judiciary and other issues crucial to a healthy democracy today. (Length: 37 minutes) Read more.
More signs the "Obama Coalition" is fraying
First it was Muslims in Pakistan and other places a bit nervous about Obama's repeatedly stated plans to unilaterally attack the Waziristan region of Pakistan. Then it was antiwar activist and left wing stalwart, Noam Chomsky being cheered when he called Obama's lack of transparency and bellicose stance into question. Now it is discomfort with Obama's choice of anti-gay rights evangelist Rick Warren to deliver the invocation at the inauguration.
Well, don't say I didn't warn you. I have been telling everyone who would listen that there have been danger signals for well over 12 months. I was repeatedly and brutally castigated for not "drinking the purple koolaid" with everyone else. How does your "Messiah" look now?
Robert Stevens
Well, don't say I didn't warn you. I have been telling everyone who would listen that there have been danger signals for well over 12 months. I was repeatedly and brutally castigated for not "drinking the purple koolaid" with everyone else. How does your "Messiah" look now?
Robert Stevens
AOL Survey Shows People are Concerned
According to an informal AOL Survey, of more than 88,000 respondents so far nationwide, only 42 percent believe that there is no merit to this Eligibility Controversy. In all but 7 US states and the District of Columbia, most citizens feel that there are unanswered questions about Obama's eligibility.
The Electoral College voted on December 15, 2008, and now the votes are being tabulated in each state. Soon these votes will be sent to the National Archives. On January 8, 2009, the new Congress will convene to consider results of the Electoral College vote. Congress is constitutionally required to discuss the validity of these votes and address any eligibility questions at this meeting.
U.S. legislators take an oath to defend the US Constitution. Given the growing concern of the public with the Eligibility Controversy, every House member and Senator should be prepared to raise their voices in support of the interests of their constituents. Our elected members of the House and Senate should live up to their oaths. They must live up to their oaths. They must listen to the people.
If House members and Senators disregard the oaths they took, they will have trouble in the next election. If House members and Senators ignore the will of the large segment of people concerned with Obama's eligibility when the House and the Senate convene on January 8, 2009, the citizens will pass judgement in the next election. With Congressional job approval ratings at historic lows, can any members of Congress afford to have a cavalier attitude about this vital question?
Make sure you contact the Senators and Congressmen, and let them know that you are concerned! This is of the utmost importance.
Robert Stevens
Addendum: Who is on the Fringe Now?
With only 42 percent of those responding to the AOL poll unconcerned about eligibility, and more than half of those surveyed believing there is a question about Obama's elibility, it is a bit tough to say that the Eligibility Controversy is just a "fringe issue". In fact, it appears that those who believe that Obama is eligible, no matter what the evidence suggests, are more accurately described as belonging to a "crazy fringe" group.
The Electoral College voted on December 15, 2008, and now the votes are being tabulated in each state. Soon these votes will be sent to the National Archives. On January 8, 2009, the new Congress will convene to consider results of the Electoral College vote. Congress is constitutionally required to discuss the validity of these votes and address any eligibility questions at this meeting.
U.S. legislators take an oath to defend the US Constitution. Given the growing concern of the public with the Eligibility Controversy, every House member and Senator should be prepared to raise their voices in support of the interests of their constituents. Our elected members of the House and Senate should live up to their oaths. They must live up to their oaths. They must listen to the people.
If House members and Senators disregard the oaths they took, they will have trouble in the next election. If House members and Senators ignore the will of the large segment of people concerned with Obama's eligibility when the House and the Senate convene on January 8, 2009, the citizens will pass judgement in the next election. With Congressional job approval ratings at historic lows, can any members of Congress afford to have a cavalier attitude about this vital question?
Make sure you contact the Senators and Congressmen, and let them know that you are concerned! This is of the utmost importance.
Robert Stevens
Addendum: Who is on the Fringe Now?
With only 42 percent of those responding to the AOL poll unconcerned about eligibility, and more than half of those surveyed believing there is a question about Obama's elibility, it is a bit tough to say that the Eligibility Controversy is just a "fringe issue". In fact, it appears that those who believe that Obama is eligible, no matter what the evidence suggests, are more accurately described as belonging to a "crazy fringe" group.
Motion for Subpoenes for Obama BC issued in WA state, case to be heard by the full court. BO announces vacation in HI
Flag this messagePLease read: Subpoena just requested by Broe v Reed: Obama just announced he is gonna vacation in Hawaii - You better get someone to watch himThursday, December 18, 2008 8:58 AM
From: "Don Villars-110807"Add sender to Contacts To: dr_taitz@yahoo.com, philjberg@obamacrimes.comNames and Designation of Persons Filing Motion
COMES NOW, James E. Broe, Kenneth R. Seal, Robert Baker, Mark Sussman, Stan Walter, Bill Wise, Andy Stevens, Ed Crawford, Jason Lagen, Louise Workman, Jocelyn Murcelli, Mike Murcelli and Kevin McDowell, by and through counsel of record Stephen Pidgeon, pursuant to RAP 17.3(a), the Rules of Discovery, CR 26-37, and CR 45 governing the issuance of subpoenas, and Move this Honorable Court for an order allowing the issuance of two subpoenas for the purpose of obtaining admissible evidence in this case, and expediting discovery pursuant to the proposed schedule.
Relief Requested
Plaintiffs seek an Order allowing plaintiffs expedited discovery by means of two subpoenas, one to be served on the Secretary of State of the State of Washington, to discover the following items: I) the Declaration of Candidacy of Barack Obama as filed in the State of Washington; 2) all records concerning the candidacy and disallowance of Socialist Worker’s Party candidate Frank Colero within the Secretary of State’s office; and one to be served upon the Director of the Department of Health in the State of Hawaii, to discover the following items: 3) the Birth Certificate of Barack Obama in Hawaii, and 4) all supporting documentation regarding the registration of the birth of Barack Obama in Hawaii. Plaintiffs seek an order which establishes the following schedule.Read more »[/quote]
Hawaii??
1. Plaintiffs are to serve the State of Hawaii Department of Health with a Subpoena in the form attached hereto as approved by the Court no later than the close of business on Monday, December 22, 2008, and responses shall be served upon Plaintiffs’ ‘counsel. no later than the close of business on December 28, 2008.
OK THIS IS WHERE IT GETS FUUUNNNY:
OBAMA HAS ANNOUNCED PLANS TO VACATION IN HAWAII !!
From: "Don Villars-110807"
COMES NOW, James E. Broe, Kenneth R. Seal, Robert Baker, Mark Sussman, Stan Walter, Bill Wise, Andy Stevens, Ed Crawford, Jason Lagen, Louise Workman, Jocelyn Murcelli, Mike Murcelli and Kevin McDowell, by and through counsel of record Stephen Pidgeon, pursuant to RAP 17.3(a), the Rules of Discovery, CR 26-37, and CR 45 governing the issuance of subpoenas, and Move this Honorable Court for an order allowing the issuance of two subpoenas for the purpose of obtaining admissible evidence in this case, and expediting discovery pursuant to the proposed schedule.
Relief Requested
Plaintiffs seek an Order allowing plaintiffs expedited discovery by means of two subpoenas, one to be served on the Secretary of State of the State of Washington, to discover the following items: I) the Declaration of Candidacy of Barack Obama as filed in the State of Washington; 2) all records concerning the candidacy and disallowance of Socialist Worker’s Party candidate Frank Colero within the Secretary of State’s office; and one to be served upon the Director of the Department of Health in the State of Hawaii, to discover the following items: 3) the Birth Certificate of Barack Obama in Hawaii, and 4) all supporting documentation regarding the registration of the birth of Barack Obama in Hawaii. Plaintiffs seek an order which establishes the following schedule.Read more »[/quote]
Hawaii??
1. Plaintiffs are to serve the State of Hawaii Department of Health with a Subpoena in the form attached hereto as approved by the Court no later than the close of business on Monday, December 22, 2008, and responses shall be served upon Plaintiffs’ ‘counsel. no later than the close of business on December 28, 2008.
OK THIS IS WHERE IT GETS FUUUNNNY:
OBAMA HAS ANNOUNCED PLANS TO VACATION IN HAWAII !!
Obama's phone number is linked to the Headquarters for the Socialism and Liberation Party
Source: Texas Darlin blog site, Dec 17th, 2008
Link: http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/google-obamas-residence-linked-to-psl-phone-number/
Jeez, - ... something else appears as a bit odd ... Does it cause Fitzgerald even more interest in Greenwood Ave???
Please post this, pass it on to many other folks, blogs, media, etc., - ... and ask them to pass it on to many others too!
Google: Obama’s Residence Linked to PSL Phone Number
December 17, 2008 by texasdarlin
© 2008 TexasDarlin/TD Blog (If you wish to use my screenshots, you must provide a link back to this blog and credit this blog as the source).
This is curious and bizarre. A reader, Jane, conducted some Google searches related to the Obamas’ Chicago home on Greenwood Avenue, and discovered the following, which I verified with my own searches, and documented with screenshots at approximately 2:30 PM ET on 12/17/08:
A Google search of the Obamas’ address, 5046 Greenwood Ave., Chicago, yields this:
Greenwood Ave. Search 12/17/08
The phone number listed for the address, if you can’t make it out, is 415-821-6171, a San Francisco area code. When I Google’d that phone number, this came up:
Greenwood Phone Search 12/17/08
The phone number associated with the Obama’s mansion is the number for the national Party of Socialism and Liberation. When I clicked on that link, I got this:
PSL Home Page 12/17/08
And a tab for local offices on the PSL site shows this:
PSL Local Offices Page 12/17/08
Why on Earth is the phone number for the Party for Socialism and Liberation linked to the Obamas’ private residence in Chicago?
Theories?
Link: http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/google-obamas-residence-linked-to-psl-phone-number/
Jeez, - ... something else appears as a bit odd ... Does it cause Fitzgerald even more interest in Greenwood Ave???
Please post this, pass it on to many other folks, blogs, media, etc., - ... and ask them to pass it on to many others too!
Google: Obama’s Residence Linked to PSL Phone Number
December 17, 2008 by texasdarlin
© 2008 TexasDarlin/TD Blog (If you wish to use my screenshots, you must provide a link back to this blog and credit this blog as the source).
This is curious and bizarre. A reader, Jane, conducted some Google searches related to the Obamas’ Chicago home on Greenwood Avenue, and discovered the following, which I verified with my own searches, and documented with screenshots at approximately 2:30 PM ET on 12/17/08:
A Google search of the Obamas’ address, 5046 Greenwood Ave., Chicago, yields this:
Greenwood Ave. Search 12/17/08
The phone number listed for the address, if you can’t make it out, is 415-821-6171, a San Francisco area code. When I Google’d that phone number, this came up:
Greenwood Phone Search 12/17/08
The phone number associated with the Obama’s mansion is the number for the national Party of Socialism and Liberation. When I clicked on that link, I got this:
PSL Home Page 12/17/08
And a tab for local offices on the PSL site shows this:
PSL Local Offices Page 12/17/08
Why on Earth is the phone number for the Party for Socialism and Liberation linked to the Obamas’ private residence in Chicago?
Theories?
Currently the Blog is visited at a rate of 3,500 per day, over 100,000 per month
I believe the snowballing rate of visits shows that people are hungry for truth, sick of mass media lies and are ready for action in removing the usurper and prosecuting everyone that is aiding and abeting this colossal fraud
Jan 8 Congressional vote on electoral college
Thursday, December 18, 2008 1:42 AM
From: "redacted>View contact details To: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
THEY DO MEET ON JAN. 8 2009
U. S. Electoral College
Public Law 110-430 changed the date of the electoral vote in Congress in 2009 from January 6 to January 8. This date change is effective only for the 2008 presidential election.
Thank You for ALL YOU DO!!!!
____________________________________________________________
From: "redacted>View contact details To: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
THEY DO MEET ON JAN. 8 2009
U. S. Electoral College
Public Law 110-430 changed the date of the electoral vote in Congress in 2009 from January 6 to January 8. This date change is effective only for the 2008 presidential election.
Thank You for ALL YOU DO!!!!
____________________________________________________________
Another idea from a reader
Thursday, December 18, 2008 4:42 AM
From: This sender is DomainKeys verified "Hanen" >View contact details To: dr_taitz@yahoo.comEASY WAY TO MAKE SURE OBAMA NEVER GETS INAUGURATED (READ CAREFULLY):–
Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II “natural born citizen” based on the Kenyan/British citizenship of Barack Obama’s father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a “citizen” born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States” as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II “natural born citizen”.
From: This sender is DomainKeys verified "Hanen" >View contact details To: dr_taitz@yahoo.comEASY WAY TO MAKE SURE OBAMA NEVER GETS INAUGURATED (READ CAREFULLY):–
Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II “natural born citizen” based on the Kenyan/British citizenship of Barack Obama’s father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a “citizen” born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States” as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II “natural born citizen”.
Here is another one that doesn't get it
Does anybody want to write to Senator Levin? How hard it is to understand that HI allow it's residents to obtain HI Birth certificate for their children born abroad and they allow birth certificates to be obtained based on a statement of one relative only. I swear after Kyl basing his knowledge on snopes and Martines saying that "it was vetted by voters that were not allowed access to the original BC" and now this one, I wonder if the collective IQ of our 100 Senators would amount to a 100??? What do you think?
Orly
PS Joan, your e-mail box didn't work, e-mail cam back
Thursday, December 18, 2008 3:58 AM
From: "Orly Taitz"View contact details To: "Joan" Joan,will you be willing to send an open letter and explain to Sen Levin the problem with Hi BC? Ask him to write a demand for formal investigation and subpoena of the original BC and other docs. Please forward a demand for indictment to him and all the att. general and US att. Patrick Fitzgerald. I will post your open letter. You can also put it on video, I will post it on you-tube channel that we are preparing: Dr. Orly Taitz presents
Orly Taitz DDS Esq
26302 La Paz ste 211
Mission Viejo Ca 92691
29839 S. Margarita Pkwy
Rancho Santa Margarita Ca 92688
ph. w 949-586-8110 c-949-683-5411
fax 949-586-2082
--- On Thu, 12/18/08, Joan Kessler wrote:
From: Joan Subject: FW: Your Concerns
To: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
Date: Thursday, December 18, 2008, 3:51 AM
Dr. Taitz,
I am just a citizen, not a lawyer, but I wanted you to see this that I received from my senator in Michigan when I sent him my concern a few weeks ago.
Joan
Grand Haven, MI
From: senator_levin@levin.senate.gov [mailto:senator_levin@levin.senate.gov]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 12:53 PM
To: (name redacted)
Subject: Re: Your Concerns
Dear Ms. (redacted):
Thank you for contacting me regarding the false rumors surrounding President-elect Obama’s citizenship status. I appreciate you sharing your thoughts with me.
As you may know, Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution states that, “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.”
President-elect Obama was born in Hawaii as documented by his official birth certificate. He is, therefore, a natural born citizen of the United States. Thank you again for writing.
Sincerely,
Carl Levin
Orly
PS Joan, your e-mail box didn't work, e-mail cam back
Thursday, December 18, 2008 3:58 AM
From: "Orly Taitz"
Orly Taitz DDS Esq
26302 La Paz ste 211
Mission Viejo Ca 92691
29839 S. Margarita Pkwy
Rancho Santa Margarita Ca 92688
ph. w 949-586-8110 c-949-683-5411
fax 949-586-2082
--- On Thu, 12/18/08, Joan Kessler
From: Joan Subject: FW: Your Concerns
To: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
Date: Thursday, December 18, 2008, 3:51 AM
Dr. Taitz,
I am just a citizen, not a lawyer, but I wanted you to see this that I received from my senator in Michigan when I sent him my concern a few weeks ago.
Joan
Grand Haven, MI
From: senator_levin@levin.senate.gov [mailto:senator_levin@levin.senate.gov]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 12:53 PM
To: (name redacted)
Subject: Re: Your Concerns
Dear Ms. (redacted):
Thank you for contacting me regarding the false rumors surrounding President-elect Obama’s citizenship status. I appreciate you sharing your thoughts with me.
As you may know, Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution states that, “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.”
President-elect Obama was born in Hawaii as documented by his official birth certificate. He is, therefore, a natural born citizen of the United States. Thank you again for writing.
Sincerely,
Carl Levin
Please forward to me the written objections to Obama presidency from Congr. Linder and other congr. and senators
Please forward to me written objections to Obama presidency from US Congressmen and Senators. I understand that Congressman Linder is the first one.
Please forward to me your videos, u-tube links and letters demanding att. generals and us attorneys to indict Obama for fraud and investigate expert reports in regards to his forged documents
Here is a letter from a reader
Dear Brilliant American Patriots;
http://www.newsonsofliberty.us/
In this article it tells that nowhere is it specified that one particular entity is responsible for vetting the presidential candidates. "They" just ASS-U-ME that the DNC or the RNC or whoever will check their own candidates background.
The other day I read an article that stated the phrase that says something to the effect of, "If the responsibility is not granted to the federal government by the Constitution and it is not granted to the states by the Constitution then those rights fall to the people." (Sorry, I can't find the article again.)
If there is not anything written specifically stating that a certain entity has the obligation to vet the presidential candidates than the job automatically falls to the people.
It is only my little mind that loves to believe in miracles but it just seems to me that the courts cannot claim "Standing" or anything else if any American citizen wants to see the candidate's proof of qualifications.
I realize that I do not have the exact quote but could someone please tell me WHY my logic isn't good enough to find out Obama's qualifications?
Along with that, is the following article that Andy sent around what we are going to try to do with Congress? I'm trying to keep up but you guys move rapidly.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Stang/alan178.htm
Dr. Edwin Vieira has four degrees from Harvard University, but he has overcome this handicap and can speak intelligible English. Among many other accomplishments, Dr. Vieira is the author of the masterful Pieces of Eight, the definitive monetary history of the United States, which in the present financial debacle is more relevant than ever. I strongly recommend you read it.
Dr. Vieira is a consummate constitutional authority. He says that if just one member of the House and one member of the Senate were to challenge Hussein's eligibility to serve as President in writing when the Electoral College's votes arrive in the Senate, the Congress would have to conduct a full investigation, complete with witnesses, testimony and documents. Dr. Vieira urges you to get in touch with your Congressmen and Senators for the purpose.
Remember, you are not asking them to deny the presidency to Hussein. You are merely asking them to require him to prove his eligibility. This should be very easy to do for lame ducks like Tar Heel Elizabeth Dole, for instance, who has nothing political to lose and therefore nothing to fear. On her way out, lame ducks like her could have the last laugh by performing this historic service to the Constitution.
Just li'le ol' me,
Karen
Please forward to me your videos, u-tube links and letters demanding att. generals and us attorneys to indict Obama for fraud and investigate expert reports in regards to his forged documents
Here is a letter from a reader
Dear Brilliant American Patriots;
http://www.newsonsofliberty.us/
In this article it tells that nowhere is it specified that one particular entity is responsible for vetting the presidential candidates. "They" just ASS-U-ME that the DNC or the RNC or whoever will check their own candidates background.
The other day I read an article that stated the phrase that says something to the effect of, "If the responsibility is not granted to the federal government by the Constitution and it is not granted to the states by the Constitution then those rights fall to the people." (Sorry, I can't find the article again.)
If there is not anything written specifically stating that a certain entity has the obligation to vet the presidential candidates than the job automatically falls to the people.
It is only my little mind that loves to believe in miracles but it just seems to me that the courts cannot claim "Standing" or anything else if any American citizen wants to see the candidate's proof of qualifications.
I realize that I do not have the exact quote but could someone please tell me WHY my logic isn't good enough to find out Obama's qualifications?
Along with that, is the following article that Andy sent around what we are going to try to do with Congress? I'm trying to keep up but you guys move rapidly.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Stang/alan178.htm
Dr. Edwin Vieira has four degrees from Harvard University, but he has overcome this handicap and can speak intelligible English. Among many other accomplishments, Dr. Vieira is the author of the masterful Pieces of Eight, the definitive monetary history of the United States, which in the present financial debacle is more relevant than ever. I strongly recommend you read it.
Dr. Vieira is a consummate constitutional authority. He says that if just one member of the House and one member of the Senate were to challenge Hussein's eligibility to serve as President in writing when the Electoral College's votes arrive in the Senate, the Congress would have to conduct a full investigation, complete with witnesses, testimony and documents. Dr. Vieira urges you to get in touch with your Congressmen and Senators for the purpose.
Remember, you are not asking them to deny the presidency to Hussein. You are merely asking them to require him to prove his eligibility. This should be very easy to do for lame ducks like Tar Heel Elizabeth Dole, for instance, who has nothing political to lose and therefore nothing to fear. On her way out, lame ducks like her could have the last laugh by performing this historic service to the Constitution.
Just li'le ol' me,
Karen
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Express your disapproval of John Kyl
I am saddened to realize that a sitting US Senator claimed in a letter to a constituent that essentially, Barack Obama is eligible to be president of the United States of America because of the careful analysis of Snopes.com. What has this country come to?
I suggest you express your concern with this lack of analysis, careful thought and proper respect for logic, reason and the rule of law by contacting the Honorable John Kyl at his offices:
PHOENIX OFFICE
2200 East Camelback, Suite 120
Phoenix, Arizona 85016-3455
Phone: (602) 840-1891
Fax: (602) 957-6838
TUCSON OFFICE
6840 North Oracle Road, Suite 150
Tucson, Arizona 85704
Phone: (520) 575-8633
Fax: (520) 797-3232
WASHINGTON, D.C. OFFICE
730 Hart Senate Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Phone: (202) 224-4521
Fax: (202) 224-2207
Email John Kyl using this form.
Tim Johnson
Michelle Obama Is The “Specifically Named Individual” On Page 64 of The Affidavit Submitted by FBI : NO QUARTER
Michelle Obama Is The “Specifically Named Individual” On Page 64 of The Affidavit Submitted by FBI : NO QUARTER: "By TruthtellergravatarcloseAuthor: Truthteller Name: Truthteller
Email: susanunpc@gmail.com
Site: http://noquarterusa.net/blog/
About: See Authors Posts (88) on December 9, 2008 at 6:37 PM
Please read the Criminal Complaint filed by David W. Cain, Special Agent of the FBI. Details of the conversations Blagojevich had with his operatives about Barack Obama and the possibility Barack Obama would strike several deals with Blagojevich regarding the open Senate seat are discussed, and yes, quotations are provided." Read more.
Please Support Orly's Efforts!!
Orly has been spending $2000-3000 of her own money traveling to-from DC plus expenses. We at USATodayAdForObamaRecords hope to post a "chip-in" link soon, but for the time being please send your contributions to: Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
26302 La Paz ste 211
Mission Viejo Ca 92691
ph. w 949-586-8110 c-949-683-5411
Bank of America
Account # 0992301937
Routing Number 122000661
An application for 501-c3 status has been filed in California.
Michelle Obama on court ordered inactive status with the Illinois State Attorneys bar from 1993, after only 4 years of practicing law. What did she do
LAWYER SEARCH: ATTORNEY'S REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC DISCIPLINARY RECORD
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and Public Disciplinary and Disability Information as of December 17, 2008 at 11:09:14 AM:
Full Licensed Name: Michelle Obama
Full Former name(s): Michelle Lavaughn Robinson
Date of Admission as Lawyer
by Illinois Supreme Court: May 12, 1989
Registered Business Address: Not available online
Registered Business Phone: Not available online
Illinois Registration Status: Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law - Last Registered Year: 1993
Malpractice Insurance:
(Current as of date of registration;
consult attorney for further information) No malpractice report required as attorney is on court ordered inactive status.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and Public Disciplinary and Disability Information as of December 17, 2008 at 11:09:14 AM:
Full Licensed Name: Michelle Obama
Full Former name(s): Michelle Lavaughn Robinson
Date of Admission as Lawyer
by Illinois Supreme Court: May 12, 1989
Registered Business Address: Not available online
Registered Business Phone: Not available online
Illinois Registration Status: Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law - Last Registered Year: 1993
Malpractice Insurance:
(Current as of date of registration;
consult attorney for further information) No malpractice report required as attorney is on court ordered inactive status.
New u-tube videos part 1 & 2 Important
Click on the pictures to the right:
on the bottom is part 1
on the top is part 2
on the bottom is part 1
on the top is part 2
Reminder
Please remember to write to Att General Mike McCuskey, US att for Northern District of Illinois- Patrick Fitzgerald, cc all 50 att Gen, 9 Supremes and Senate and Congress and demand immediate inditment of Obama on massive fraud committed. Se prior article "Urgent, What needs to be done!" From Dec 13. They all need to know that the whole country is watching them and we all will hold them and our corrupt MSM acountable
Lightfoot is being resubmitted to Chief Justice Roberts. See analysis
I am writing an open letter to Chief Justice Roberts, I am resubmitting the petition to him. I could use an easy route and resubmit to Thomas and Scalia, but we already know that they are voting for the constitution. My concern is that twice during conferences the full court voted against the petitions, de facto against the constitution. At least 4 Justices had to vote yes for the petition to go to the oral argument. Since it didn't go there, it means that not only liberal Justices: Souter, Stevens, Bryer and Ginsburg and swing vote Kennedy voted against, but one of the conservative Justices: Roberts or Alito voted against as well, and I decided to zero in and see, which one is it. I need to resubmit not to Thomas or Scalia, but to either Roberts or Alito and by process of elimination, I will know which one is it. He will not be able to hide behind the conference anymore. I decided to write to Roberts. It will be an open letter, that will be posted on the Internet, it will be read at the numerous radio stations around the country, including the radio stations around all the military bases, it will be in the video form on U-tube, the whole country will be watching him. Roberts will not be able to hide, he will have to show to the whole nation, whether he is for the constitution of this country or whether he is ready to tear it apart in favor of some new world order conceived by a few bankers and the trilateral commission.
Additionally, Roberts has a duty to swear in the new president. This duty can be seen as a ministerial duty.
Lastly, the candidate needs to put his hand on a bible, that says that bear false witness is an abomination and I wonder, how Roberts, a Catholic, feels about it, based on all the massive fraud committed by Obama.
If at the end of the day our Judiciary, our law enforcement and our government fails us, we will have the right to remove the usurper using all means necessary. Our army is sworn to uphold the constitution, they have the right to remove the usurper from the White house to uphold the constitution, and we still have our second amendment right and we might need to use it to defend our rights and freedoms, guaranteed to us by our constitution.
Additionally, Roberts has a duty to swear in the new president. This duty can be seen as a ministerial duty.
Lastly, the candidate needs to put his hand on a bible, that says that bear false witness is an abomination and I wonder, how Roberts, a Catholic, feels about it, based on all the massive fraud committed by Obama.
If at the end of the day our Judiciary, our law enforcement and our government fails us, we will have the right to remove the usurper using all means necessary. Our army is sworn to uphold the constitution, they have the right to remove the usurper from the White house to uphold the constitution, and we still have our second amendment right and we might need to use it to defend our rights and freedoms, guaranteed to us by our constitution.
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Response to the anonymous
There is something I have to explain to anonymous and his statement "people have spoken", which echoes a similar statement I hear from the MSM. I recall that in the USSR the communist party bragged about the fact that the people have spoken and voted for them- some 99%. They were not talking about the fact that corrupt and controlled media wasn't telling people the truth. I see the same thing today in the States. Our corrupt and bought media didn't report a drop of truth about BO's ineligibility. They didn't explain to people, that Hi statue 338 allows Hi citizens to register their children born abroad in HI and get Hi birth certificate for them, they didn't report that the Natural Born citizen has to have both parents, that are citizens. People running the media need to wake up and smell the coffee before their empires are taken apart and they are slapped with fraud law suits. Wake up people, start reporting the truth and cut your losses.
Do not be discouraged: we need to fight on
Over and over, people tell me they are discouraged because of the "failed" lawsuits. It is true that lawsuit after lawsuit was dimissed, one after another (Cort, Donofrio, etc). However, this is not the time to lose heart.
According to the Michigan Law Review special issue a few months ago on the "natural born citizenship" challenges to both Obama and McCain, it is unlikely that these controversies will be settled in court, because of the "standing" issue and something called "judiciability".
The reason "standing" prevents many of these lawsuits from being heard is that there is apparently a long-standing precedent that ordinary citizens cannot challenge a candidate who might be ineligible in a court because the ordinary citizens supposedly have not suffered any direct personal loss because of any potential ineligibility.
"Judiciability" is something that the courts struggle with all the time. Judges ask, is a given complaint something that should be settled by the courts, or is it best addressed politically? If an issue is not "judiciable", then the courts will not rule on it, but pass it on to the political process instead.
These two difficulties with legal challenges (which were anticipated months ago and therefore are no surprise to at least some observers and experts) seem to suggest that few (if any courts) would be willing to hear these sorts of complaints. However, these academic opinions might not be correct of course, and events might unfold in a different way than the legal experts writing in the Michigan Law Review anticipated.
However, even if the lawsuits were dismissed, that does not mean that the lawsuits were worthless. The lawsuits were and are invaluable and even crucial. Six weeks ago, I read that only 20 percent or so of the Republican readers of a conservative Orange County Register columnist had even heard of the eligibility issue, according to an informal survey. Now, I suspect that the fraction that have heard of this eligibility problem is likely far far greater.
I track the number of "Google news hits" a Google news search returns for the term "obama birth certificate" each day. I have tracked this number for weeks. This ccrude statistic is a count of the number of stories on the topic, over the last few days. About half of the news hits are from stictly online sources, and initially many were just blogs. I noticed that the number of "Google news hits" rose from about 170 over 2 months ago, to about one thousand around the time of the election. Then it dropped precipitously to approximately 300 two weeks ago. With the recent lawsuit news, it rose again to a peak of 3000, and yesterday this "Google news hits" number was in the neighborhood of 1500 or so. This suggests that this story is of growing interest generally, and is still present in the public eye in a substantial way.
Because the US mainstream press has been very reluctant to cover this issue, people often do not know about it. Even the conservative media has been essentially silent on this topic. Where are our vaunted icons of conservative talk radio? Where is the belligerent and foaming-at-the-mouth, rabidly right-wing Fox News? For the most part, these two media segments have also "drank the purple koolaid". Those following this eligiblity issue and promoting it have been repeatedly dismissed as belonging to a lunatic fringe, or pejoratively called "conspiracy theorists". However, these charges are getting tougher and tougher to make as momentum builds. This is thanks partly to these lawsuits and the attention they place on the eligibility controversy.
There are signs our message is getting out there. One of our volunteers called an Illinois elector last weekend, and was informed that all of the Illinois electors were being called to the state capital for a meeting Sunday night before the voting, to discuss the situation with lawyers. This meeting apparently was to help them address their fears of the legal consequences of voting for Obama. Even if they all voted for Obama (and we have not yet heard if there were any faithless electors yet, something previously so rare that there were less than half a dozen in over two centuries), the fact that the Illinois electors had this meeting at all speaks volumes for the impact we are having. And a large number of the concerns these electors have are the result of the impact of our calls and letters and the lawsuits (even the dismissed lawsuits).
A second indication of the influence we are having is from another call that another volunteer made last night to a congresswoman. This congresswoman indicated her willingness and enthusiasm to speak out about this issue in Congress when it meets in January. Of course, this does not indicate that she will actually do what she said she would, but this sort of assertion never would have happened if it had not been for our movement raising the profile of this controversy. With the mainstream media and the conservative media essentially silent, we had to get the word out using "any means necessary"; phone calls, FAXes, emails, mail, lawsuits, petitions, etc. Even the dismissed lawsuits serve as an integral part of this effort, although that was clearly not the reason they were filed. Now is not the time to give up!
A third indication of the value of our approach comes from an amazing speech by left wing icon Noam Chomsky. Chomsky attacks Obama over and over for his lack of transparency, and for behaving differently than they expected (signalling his intention to pursue a bellicose foreign policy and showing evidence of being controlled by big money interests). Amazingly, this crowd of leftists cheered enthusiastically when Chomsky made these charges! I personally had pointed out these same shortcomings over and over for well over a year, but my complaints fell on deaf ears. No one wanted to hear that there were any problems with the "Messiah". Almost everyone laughed at me as a lunatic, and called me a "right wing nut", stupid, or worse. Now, our complaints about a lack of openness are gaining traction. We cannot stop now!
A fourth indication that momentum is building is the revelation that law enforcement, including the FBI, has been keeping close tabs on Obama and his criminal associates. A few weeks ago, when I was discussing my concerns with Obama with an FBI analyst, he dismissed me as a conspiracy theorist on the fringe, essentially parroting statements in the media. I doubt if he would do the same now. The emergence of serious legal charges swirling around the Obama Camp and its associates has made our claims far more credible, and adds to the general air of distrust that is accumulating.
Some of the electors we contacted have expressed their frustration at our efforts with expletive-filled replies. I would suggest that this is a hopeful sign; we are not being ignored. We are raising the issue. We want people to be aware of the eligibility controversy and to discuss it. There is no such thing as bad publicity, because we want this controversy to be examined carefully by the public. Most of the public is unaware of this controversy and has not studied the evidence yet. If people complain bitterly to their friends and the media about our efforts, so much the better. It will keep this topic in the public eye, and more will investigate the actual controversy. Some will reach the same conclusion we have reached, swelling our ranks. It is even worse for us to be ignored, as we were previously.
Finally, we have signs that the Republican party is finally waking about some of these issues and might be willing to pursue them. Because the Republicans were unable or unwilling to focus on Obama's eligibility problems, the fox almost got into the henhouse. The primary checks and balances to prevent something like this eligibility issue from being ignored and left unaddressed are (1) the challenges from the opposing party and (2) the scrutiny of the media. In the case of the eligibility controversy, both of these two important factors were inexplicably almost totally absent. If the Republicans will step up to the plate with their resources, the game will be very different. And the only reason they will commit to this project is because we have raised the profile of this controversy through grassroots efforts, including the lawsuits (even including the dismissed lawsuits, as disappointing as those results are). Let's not give up hope now!
What is needed now is to mount a concerted attack on these eligibility issues as Obama faces the next hurdles before becoming inaugurated at the end of January. The media, Secretaries of State, Election Commissions, State Governors, State Attorneys General, and State and Federal Legislators need to hear from us; FAXes, emails, phone calls, and snail mail. Let's keep up the momentum and continue to express our concern with these issues!
Tips for contacting legislators
I am no expert in this, but here are some useful suggestions I have culled from my reading.
Form letters are less effective. After seeing the first one or two, recipients will just ignore the rest.
Congressmen and Senators and state legislators are less interested in hearing from people who are not in their districts. So bear that in mind when you contact them.
Gmail will not reveal your location through your IP address, but many other email programs will.
Direct dialing Congressional and Senate offices will often reveal your location, but using the central congressional switchboards will supposedly not. You can also set your telephone to not reveal your originating number. There are many toll free numbers for reaching the Congressional switchboard. For example, a quick search turned up:
1-877-851-6437
1-888-335-3588
1-888-818-6641
1-800-828-0498
1-800-459-1887
1-800-614-2803
1-866-340-9281
1-866-338-1015
1-866-220-0044
The name of the game in lobbying is irritation and impact. The more staff time it takes to deal with our contact efforts, the more aware our elected officials will be that we are concerned. And the more concern that is expressed, the more nervous these elected officials will be that they will lose their positions, replete with power and perks, if they do not respond to us appropriately.
So how do we have an impact? Email is easily blocked or deleted, but can be sent out in immense volumes, and with great frequency. If you have the option of requesting a response in your email, you should do so. This will force someone to expend effort and energy to deal with your message, and therefore have more of an impact. Faxes and snail mail occupy space and consume time and effort and resources. Phone calls draw on staff resources. The advantage of telephone calls is that they often can produce more useful feedback of the effectiveness of our efforts than other contact methods.
Therefore, I would guess that emails are not as effective as faxes, which are less effective than snail mail, which is less effective than certified letters. Telephone calls are also pretty effective, but I am not sure how they compare to regular physical mail.
Email attachments are often never opened. Email with attachments is sometimes discarded because attachments often contain viruses. Embed any attachments in the body of the email if possible. Gmail allows one to place images in the email body quite easily, for example.
Many elected officials are starting to use web-based tools to cut down on email spam. Looking at the source code of these webpages with email forms can sometimes reveal the true email address of the intended recipient. However, many of these emails sent from these sorts of tools are filtered to reject those that are outside the legislator's district. Even regular email to a legislator's office can go through a similar filter. Bear that in mind when you use these web-based tools. Many of the aides and staff of these legislators, who are often quite influential, still have regular email addresses and so can be contacted by conventional bulk email.
Shorter email messages and letters are typically better because there is a greater chance they will be read.
Placing a long list of email addresses in the "To" slot in your email program is not helpful. An email obviously sent to a long list of people might be discarded automatically as spam in some cases. Even if the software does not reject this sort of email, people receiving such an email might ignore it as spam. If they do read it, they will feel more comfortable ignoring the issues raised since they believe that surely someone else on this huge list will tend to the problem. Therefore, put any long list of email addresses in the "bcc" slot in your email program, and mail the message to yourself. That way the recipients will not know how many are on your email list and what their addresses are. Some email software is designed for bulk emailing and will do this automatically for you.
Robert Stevens
According to the Michigan Law Review special issue a few months ago on the "natural born citizenship" challenges to both Obama and McCain, it is unlikely that these controversies will be settled in court, because of the "standing" issue and something called "judiciability".
The reason "standing" prevents many of these lawsuits from being heard is that there is apparently a long-standing precedent that ordinary citizens cannot challenge a candidate who might be ineligible in a court because the ordinary citizens supposedly have not suffered any direct personal loss because of any potential ineligibility.
"Judiciability" is something that the courts struggle with all the time. Judges ask, is a given complaint something that should be settled by the courts, or is it best addressed politically? If an issue is not "judiciable", then the courts will not rule on it, but pass it on to the political process instead.
These two difficulties with legal challenges (which were anticipated months ago and therefore are no surprise to at least some observers and experts) seem to suggest that few (if any courts) would be willing to hear these sorts of complaints. However, these academic opinions might not be correct of course, and events might unfold in a different way than the legal experts writing in the Michigan Law Review anticipated.
However, even if the lawsuits were dismissed, that does not mean that the lawsuits were worthless. The lawsuits were and are invaluable and even crucial. Six weeks ago, I read that only 20 percent or so of the Republican readers of a conservative Orange County Register columnist had even heard of the eligibility issue, according to an informal survey. Now, I suspect that the fraction that have heard of this eligibility problem is likely far far greater.
I track the number of "Google news hits" a Google news search returns for the term "obama birth certificate" each day. I have tracked this number for weeks. This ccrude statistic is a count of the number of stories on the topic, over the last few days. About half of the news hits are from stictly online sources, and initially many were just blogs. I noticed that the number of "Google news hits" rose from about 170 over 2 months ago, to about one thousand around the time of the election. Then it dropped precipitously to approximately 300 two weeks ago. With the recent lawsuit news, it rose again to a peak of 3000, and yesterday this "Google news hits" number was in the neighborhood of 1500 or so. This suggests that this story is of growing interest generally, and is still present in the public eye in a substantial way.
Because the US mainstream press has been very reluctant to cover this issue, people often do not know about it. Even the conservative media has been essentially silent on this topic. Where are our vaunted icons of conservative talk radio? Where is the belligerent and foaming-at-the-mouth, rabidly right-wing Fox News? For the most part, these two media segments have also "drank the purple koolaid". Those following this eligiblity issue and promoting it have been repeatedly dismissed as belonging to a lunatic fringe, or pejoratively called "conspiracy theorists". However, these charges are getting tougher and tougher to make as momentum builds. This is thanks partly to these lawsuits and the attention they place on the eligibility controversy.
There are signs our message is getting out there. One of our volunteers called an Illinois elector last weekend, and was informed that all of the Illinois electors were being called to the state capital for a meeting Sunday night before the voting, to discuss the situation with lawyers. This meeting apparently was to help them address their fears of the legal consequences of voting for Obama. Even if they all voted for Obama (and we have not yet heard if there were any faithless electors yet, something previously so rare that there were less than half a dozen in over two centuries), the fact that the Illinois electors had this meeting at all speaks volumes for the impact we are having. And a large number of the concerns these electors have are the result of the impact of our calls and letters and the lawsuits (even the dismissed lawsuits).
A second indication of the influence we are having is from another call that another volunteer made last night to a congresswoman. This congresswoman indicated her willingness and enthusiasm to speak out about this issue in Congress when it meets in January. Of course, this does not indicate that she will actually do what she said she would, but this sort of assertion never would have happened if it had not been for our movement raising the profile of this controversy. With the mainstream media and the conservative media essentially silent, we had to get the word out using "any means necessary"; phone calls, FAXes, emails, mail, lawsuits, petitions, etc. Even the dismissed lawsuits serve as an integral part of this effort, although that was clearly not the reason they were filed. Now is not the time to give up!
A third indication of the value of our approach comes from an amazing speech by left wing icon Noam Chomsky. Chomsky attacks Obama over and over for his lack of transparency, and for behaving differently than they expected (signalling his intention to pursue a bellicose foreign policy and showing evidence of being controlled by big money interests). Amazingly, this crowd of leftists cheered enthusiastically when Chomsky made these charges! I personally had pointed out these same shortcomings over and over for well over a year, but my complaints fell on deaf ears. No one wanted to hear that there were any problems with the "Messiah". Almost everyone laughed at me as a lunatic, and called me a "right wing nut", stupid, or worse. Now, our complaints about a lack of openness are gaining traction. We cannot stop now!
A fourth indication that momentum is building is the revelation that law enforcement, including the FBI, has been keeping close tabs on Obama and his criminal associates. A few weeks ago, when I was discussing my concerns with Obama with an FBI analyst, he dismissed me as a conspiracy theorist on the fringe, essentially parroting statements in the media. I doubt if he would do the same now. The emergence of serious legal charges swirling around the Obama Camp and its associates has made our claims far more credible, and adds to the general air of distrust that is accumulating.
Some of the electors we contacted have expressed their frustration at our efforts with expletive-filled replies. I would suggest that this is a hopeful sign; we are not being ignored. We are raising the issue. We want people to be aware of the eligibility controversy and to discuss it. There is no such thing as bad publicity, because we want this controversy to be examined carefully by the public. Most of the public is unaware of this controversy and has not studied the evidence yet. If people complain bitterly to their friends and the media about our efforts, so much the better. It will keep this topic in the public eye, and more will investigate the actual controversy. Some will reach the same conclusion we have reached, swelling our ranks. It is even worse for us to be ignored, as we were previously.
Finally, we have signs that the Republican party is finally waking about some of these issues and might be willing to pursue them. Because the Republicans were unable or unwilling to focus on Obama's eligibility problems, the fox almost got into the henhouse. The primary checks and balances to prevent something like this eligibility issue from being ignored and left unaddressed are (1) the challenges from the opposing party and (2) the scrutiny of the media. In the case of the eligibility controversy, both of these two important factors were inexplicably almost totally absent. If the Republicans will step up to the plate with their resources, the game will be very different. And the only reason they will commit to this project is because we have raised the profile of this controversy through grassroots efforts, including the lawsuits (even including the dismissed lawsuits, as disappointing as those results are). Let's not give up hope now!
What is needed now is to mount a concerted attack on these eligibility issues as Obama faces the next hurdles before becoming inaugurated at the end of January. The media, Secretaries of State, Election Commissions, State Governors, State Attorneys General, and State and Federal Legislators need to hear from us; FAXes, emails, phone calls, and snail mail. Let's keep up the momentum and continue to express our concern with these issues!
Tips for contacting legislators
I am no expert in this, but here are some useful suggestions I have culled from my reading.
Form letters are less effective. After seeing the first one or two, recipients will just ignore the rest.
Congressmen and Senators and state legislators are less interested in hearing from people who are not in their districts. So bear that in mind when you contact them.
Gmail will not reveal your location through your IP address, but many other email programs will.
Direct dialing Congressional and Senate offices will often reveal your location, but using the central congressional switchboards will supposedly not. You can also set your telephone to not reveal your originating number. There are many toll free numbers for reaching the Congressional switchboard. For example, a quick search turned up:
1-877-851-6437
1-888-335-3588
1-888-818-6641
1-800-828-0498
1-800-459-1887
1-800-614-2803
1-866-340-9281
1-866-338-1015
1-866-220-0044
The name of the game in lobbying is irritation and impact. The more staff time it takes to deal with our contact efforts, the more aware our elected officials will be that we are concerned. And the more concern that is expressed, the more nervous these elected officials will be that they will lose their positions, replete with power and perks, if they do not respond to us appropriately.
So how do we have an impact? Email is easily blocked or deleted, but can be sent out in immense volumes, and with great frequency. If you have the option of requesting a response in your email, you should do so. This will force someone to expend effort and energy to deal with your message, and therefore have more of an impact. Faxes and snail mail occupy space and consume time and effort and resources. Phone calls draw on staff resources. The advantage of telephone calls is that they often can produce more useful feedback of the effectiveness of our efforts than other contact methods.
Therefore, I would guess that emails are not as effective as faxes, which are less effective than snail mail, which is less effective than certified letters. Telephone calls are also pretty effective, but I am not sure how they compare to regular physical mail.
Email attachments are often never opened. Email with attachments is sometimes discarded because attachments often contain viruses. Embed any attachments in the body of the email if possible. Gmail allows one to place images in the email body quite easily, for example.
Many elected officials are starting to use web-based tools to cut down on email spam. Looking at the source code of these webpages with email forms can sometimes reveal the true email address of the intended recipient. However, many of these emails sent from these sorts of tools are filtered to reject those that are outside the legislator's district. Even regular email to a legislator's office can go through a similar filter. Bear that in mind when you use these web-based tools. Many of the aides and staff of these legislators, who are often quite influential, still have regular email addresses and so can be contacted by conventional bulk email.
Shorter email messages and letters are typically better because there is a greater chance they will be read.
Placing a long list of email addresses in the "To" slot in your email program is not helpful. An email obviously sent to a long list of people might be discarded automatically as spam in some cases. Even if the software does not reject this sort of email, people receiving such an email might ignore it as spam. If they do read it, they will feel more comfortable ignoring the issues raised since they believe that surely someone else on this huge list will tend to the problem. Therefore, put any long list of email addresses in the "bcc" slot in your email program, and mail the message to yourself. That way the recipients will not know how many are on your email list and what their addresses are. Some email software is designed for bulk emailing and will do this automatically for you.
Robert Stevens
comment on press confwerence from free Republic
2:28:00 - You may especially wish to hear Orly Taitz at this point. She gets to the point with the news media. A very refreshing point in a very informative and challenging segment.
Just one potential admonition if you will allow. I did not hear the term "fictitious presidency" used, but maybe I just missed it. I did hear "usurper," though. Both apply. Come to think of it, I.O. should have been using these terms more its prior articles, too...
Just one potential admonition if you will allow. I did not hear the term "fictitious presidency" used, but maybe I just missed it. I did hear "usurper," though. Both apply. Come to think of it, I.O. should have been using these terms more its prior articles, too...
comment on press conference
To: albie
Orly is great. One of the women who works for ABC’s Nightline told orly to go home (USSR). Typical disgusting contempt by the MSM.
Orly is great. One of the women who works for ABC’s Nightline told orly to go home (USSR). Typical disgusting contempt by the MSM.
From free republic
To: savedbygrace
“Wow, Orly Taitz really gives the reporters hell, doesn’t she?”
...she’s terrific! One of the very few times that these scumbag reporters have been called to task. It seems to take someone who has lived with or knows socialism from the inside and through life experience to really get worked up. They realize how important and fragile freedom and the free market is. Most of America’s dummies don’t even know what it is and don’t care. They’re more concerned that Oprah is up to 200 lbs.
“Wow, Orly Taitz really gives the reporters hell, doesn’t she?”
...she’s terrific! One of the very few times that these scumbag reporters have been called to task. It seems to take someone who has lived with or knows socialism from the inside and through life experience to really get worked up. They realize how important and fragile freedom and the free market is. Most of America’s dummies don’t even know what it is and don’t care. They’re more concerned that Oprah is up to 200 lbs.
Monday, December 15, 2008
Idea for President's executive order in re to Obama
I talked today with the audience on Andrea Shea-King show in Florida.
two new ideas came up:
1. Writing to President Bush and Vice President Chaney and demanding an executive order, deeming Obama ineligible for presidency, due to the fact that his father was a foreigner.
2. Issuing an executive order, demanding that Obama sign a consent to produce documents, verifying his citizenship, such as his original birth certificate, passports, immigration and naturalization records, school and college enrollment records and so on.
Another idea is to have stickers for cars: "Obama is not a Natural born Citizen". "Obama ois not eligible for presidency", "I sued Obama and proud of it"
Let me know if you would like to participate in this effort
two new ideas came up:
1. Writing to President Bush and Vice President Chaney and demanding an executive order, deeming Obama ineligible for presidency, due to the fact that his father was a foreigner.
2. Issuing an executive order, demanding that Obama sign a consent to produce documents, verifying his citizenship, such as his original birth certificate, passports, immigration and naturalization records, school and college enrollment records and so on.
Another idea is to have stickers for cars: "Obama is not a Natural born Citizen". "Obama ois not eligible for presidency", "I sued Obama and proud of it"
Let me know if you would like to participate in this effort
Chicago corruption investigation
http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm
Grand Jury Subpoenas Issued for Rezko/Obama Land Deal
A former Illinois bank official, now claiming whistleblower status, says bank officials replaced a loan reappraisal that he prepared for a Chicago property that was purchased by the wife of now-convicted felon Tony Rezko, part of which was later sold to next-door neighbor Barack Obama.
In a complaint filed Thursday in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Kenneth J. Connor said that his reappraisal of Rita Rezko's property was replaced with a higher one and that he was fired when he questioned the document.
"Connor's internal whistle-blowing activity at Mutual Bank implicates Mutual Bank and the potentially guilty officers thereof to prosecution under federal and Illinois statutes," said the complaint, filed by attorney Glenn R. Gaffney.
The complaint said Mutual Bank officials could be guilty of making false statements, willfully overvaluing property, bank fraud, witness retaliation, willful violation of a lawful subpoena, FDIC violations, and state banking regulations.
_____________________________________________________
I Know Nothing!
On December 11th, Obama said, "I am quite confident that no representatives of mine would have had any part in any deals related to this seat."
However, The Chicago Tribune reported on Saturday, the 13th, confirms FOX News Chicago's report from Thursday, December 11th:
A source said that contact between the Obama camp and the governor’s administration regarding the Senate seat began the Saturday before the Nov. 4 election, when Emanuel made a call to the cell phone of Harris (Blagojevich's Chief of Staff, John Harris). The conversation took place around the same time press reports surfaced about Emanuel being approached about taking the high-level White House post should Obama win.
Emanuel delivered a list of candidates who would be "acceptable" to Obama, the source said. On the list were Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett, Illinois Veterans Affairs director Tammy Duckworth, state Comptroller Dan Hynes and U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky of Chicago, the source said. All are Democrats.
Sometime after the election, Emanuel called Harris back to add the name of Democratic Atty. Gen. Lisa Madigan to the approved list, the source said.
Another source told the Tribune that "communications between Emanuel and the Blagojevich administration were captured on court-approved wiretaps."
Grand Jury Subpoenas Issued for Rezko/Obama Land Deal
A former Illinois bank official, now claiming whistleblower status, says bank officials replaced a loan reappraisal that he prepared for a Chicago property that was purchased by the wife of now-convicted felon Tony Rezko, part of which was later sold to next-door neighbor Barack Obama.
In a complaint filed Thursday in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Kenneth J. Connor said that his reappraisal of Rita Rezko's property was replaced with a higher one and that he was fired when he questioned the document.
"Connor's internal whistle-blowing activity at Mutual Bank implicates Mutual Bank and the potentially guilty officers thereof to prosecution under federal and Illinois statutes," said the complaint, filed by attorney Glenn R. Gaffney.
The complaint said Mutual Bank officials could be guilty of making false statements, willfully overvaluing property, bank fraud, witness retaliation, willful violation of a lawful subpoena, FDIC violations, and state banking regulations.
_____________________________________________________
I Know Nothing!
On December 11th, Obama said, "I am quite confident that no representatives of mine would have had any part in any deals related to this seat."
However, The Chicago Tribune reported on Saturday, the 13th, confirms FOX News Chicago's report from Thursday, December 11th:
A source said that contact between the Obama camp and the governor’s administration regarding the Senate seat began the Saturday before the Nov. 4 election, when Emanuel made a call to the cell phone of Harris (Blagojevich's Chief of Staff, John Harris). The conversation took place around the same time press reports surfaced about Emanuel being approached about taking the high-level White House post should Obama win.
Emanuel delivered a list of candidates who would be "acceptable" to Obama, the source said. On the list were Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett, Illinois Veterans Affairs director Tammy Duckworth, state Comptroller Dan Hynes and U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky of Chicago, the source said. All are Democrats.
Sometime after the election, Emanuel called Harris back to add the name of Democratic Atty. Gen. Lisa Madigan to the approved list, the source said.
Another source told the Tribune that "communications between Emanuel and the Blagojevich administration were captured on court-approved wiretaps."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
