Birther Orly Taitz confronts Chief Justice John Roberts (+playlist)

http://www.youtube.com/v/fbl54phHfE8?list=PL54FAA29E29AD9139&version=3&showinfo=1&attribution_tag=iX23nyCRVXFmwaRuoXIxBQ&autoplay=1&autohide=1&feature=share

Taitz report 10.26.2013. Were there any kickbacks in 700 million Obamaca...

This blog and defendourfreedoms.net was taken over by obots. Please don't use them.
the only blog Dr. Taitz is using, is orlytaitzesq.com

The Defend Our Freedoms blog/site hijacked!

Please go to Dr. orly Taitz Equire's New OFFICIAL Blog at;
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/

Sorry for the delay as we had to try to get this sorted outr and get a relaible web host and set up a whole new blog.

Somebody has sabotaged this site, please go to new site

the New Blog site at: defendourfreedoms

NOTE: this post is upddated because the defendourfreedoms.us and defendourfreedoms.org were hijacked.

More info on this matter is on the new
site that should be more secure. http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/

More False Rumors in regards to the military

I just had a conference call with Ambassador Dr. Alan Keyes, Attorney Gery Kreep (with whom I work on Dr. Keyes state case in CA)and other plaintiffs and officials. Mr. Kreep has told me and later has forwarded an e-mail from a gentleman that goes by name John Jay, though I don't believe that this is his real name. Mr. John Jay (or whoever he is, probably part of Obama administration) is sending e-mails to different people, saying that I just urge members of the military to disobey orders, that for no reason I am just telling people to disobey orders. This is not true. I am telling that I will be filing an action, seeking a writ of mandate from a judge to get Obama's original birth certificate and other vital records, to see if he is a natural born citizen and if he is a legitimate president and commander in Chief. This is not saying to disobey orders, this is demanding vital information, that every member of the military is entitled to obtain. Who is this man sitting in the White House?. Based on the information we have, this is Barry Soetoro, citizen of Indonesia and Kenya. If members of the military are following orders of somebody, who is a foreigner and not a legitimate President and commander in Chief, they are following illegal orders and can be subject to court martial. You can see below a letter that I received from Mr. Morgan Ward, who honorably served in the military for many years and who now has a show on Plains radio and who is a big supporter of mine. At the bottom of this e-mail is an e-mail from him, where he successfully used rule 138 and you can see my response. As a member of the military that risks his life or risked his life to defend the Constitution of this country against all enemy foreign and domestic you deserve to get some answers. If you feel that Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama owes you to risk one minute of his precious time and sign a consent for release of all of his vital records, then contact me at dr_taitz@yahoo.com and you can become one of the plaintiffs seeking release of such records.


This e-mail is sent in a blind-cc form to members of the military that have related to me interest in becoming plaintiffs in an action aimed in obtaing proper documentation, verifying Mr. Obama's qualifications as a commander in Chief. It is also sent to legal professionals that are assisting me in this endeavor. I would ask members of the military to feel out a grievance under rule 138, stating that they need to get proper documentation verifying that the Commander in Chief Mr. Soetoro-Obama is eligible due to the fact that he needs to be a Natural Born Citizen, and Mr. Obama refused to provide such documentation and kept all his vital records sealed in spite of 42 Legal actions filed in Federal courts alone (according to Justia) and probably similar number of legal actions filed in State courts.Definition of Natural Born Citizen is: One born in the country to parents (plural) that are citizens of that country. Vattel, law of Nations.Natural Born citizens of the US are ones born in the US to parents that don't owe any allegiance to any foreign sovereignty. Per John A Bingham, framer of the 14th amendment.1. At the inauguration ceremony it was stated that Mr. Obama is a son of an African-American immigrant. In reality Mr. Obama's father was here on a student visa and was never an immigrant in this country, and never even had a Green Card. He was Kenyan and since at that time Kenya was a British colony, he was a British citizen and transferred such British citizenship to his son at birth which in itself disqualifies Mr. Obama from Presidency and position of the Commander in Chief, regardless of where he was born: in US or Kenya.2. There are a number of sworn affidavits from Kenya stating that Mr. Obama was born there. State of HI statue 338 allows Foreign Born children of HI residents to get a certification of HI Live birth and it can be received base on a statement of one relative only. Mr. Obama never presented his original birth certificate and it stays sealed in the Health Department in Hi. He showed only a short version of Certification of Life birth issued in 2007, that is usually received when the original BC is not available, or altered, or illegible. HI health department confirmed that they have the original birth certificate, however they refused to provide to the citizens of this Nation any details: is it a BC of a foreign born child of a HI resident, was it obtained base on actual records from a hospital with a signature of a hospital official and the name and signature of the doctor, or was it obtained based on a statement of one relative only, who might be making a false statement in order to avoid going through expense and hassle of immigration procedures.3. Numerous volunteers have searched and checked hospital after hospital and no birthing records or vital records were ever found in any hospital in Hi.4. Additionally, around the age of 5 or 6 y. old Mr. Obama has immigrated to the Nation of Indonesia with his mother and stepfather Lolo Soetoro, and his school records from Indonesia show his name to be Barry Soetoro, citizenship -Indonesian. Since Indonesia does not allow dual citizenship, his parents had te relinquish his US citizenship in order to obtain Indonesian citizenship for him.5. When Mr. Soetoro-Obama came back to this country, he studied at Occidental college. Mr.Soetoro-Obama keeps his immigration records, passports and school and university enrollment records sealed, however a number of his former classmates from Occidental college made statements, that they remember him as Barry Soetoro. There is an entry in CA journal of Assembly, showing financial aid given to foreign exchange students among them Soetoro from Indonesia. Mr. Soetoro -Obama has stated that he traveled to Pakistan in 1981, when there was a ban on US citizens to travel to Pakistan and the only reasonable explanation is that he traveled on his Indonesian passport. All of these facts show that as an adult Mr. Soetoro has confirmed his allegiance to Indonesia, while relinquishing his US citizenship.Due to all of the above Mr. Soetoro -Obama is not eligible, not legitimate for the position of the Commander in Chief. Taking orders from an illegitimate commander in Chief will mean taking orders that are not lawful, which would expose the military personal to court martial. The serviceman--------(your name) requests investigation by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Pentagon of the matter. If members of Joint Chiefs of staff and Pentagon find that indeed Mr. Obama -Soetoro is ineligible, I would ask them to join as my plaintiffs in a legal action to be filed directly in the Supreme Court of the US, seeking removal of Mr. Obama from his position of President and Commander in Chief due to ineligibility and obtaining the position by virtue of fraudulent misrepresentation.Sincerely Dr. Orly Taitz Esq

26302 La Paz ste 211
Mission Viejo Ca 92691

29839 S. Margarita Pkwy
Rancho Santa Margarita Ca 92688

ph. w 949-586-8110 c-949-683-5411
fax 949-586-2082

--- On Sun, 2/1/09, morgan ward wrote:

From: morgan ward
Subject: Follow up on Hotel accomodations in DFW and a suggested remedy for Obama to prove elligibility from the military
To: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
Cc: stevewhughes@yahoo.com
Date: Sunday, February 1, 2009, 6:04 AM

Dr Taitz, You had sent me an email as a representative of Plains Radio Network to assist you in locating availability of rooms for your April Conference. I have beed desperately inquiring and what I have come up with is not too positive. There are rooms available but spread all over the Dallas , Ft. Worth area, but not in Mass. I have been told that it would be nearly impossible to arrange such a large gathering in a close radius. I will still try as I want to help you find accomodations. In another matter. I would really like you to read and consider what I am going to share with you regarding an Article 138 UCMJ complaint. I am aware that you and Leo agree to the fact that ACTIVE duty military have the best chance at standing in a suit against Obama. I believe there is another way which would't require but one active duty personnel to initiate, and with NO harm to their Career. This is a little known method but I really believe can grant you huge dividends. Please take the time to consider the following. You may have to tweak the complaint and remedy a little, as I am just giving you the jest of my suggestion. The other part is the actual UCMJ article 138. Orly, I am a retired US Army SFC. Few people in the military are familiar with an Article 138 Investigation. While on Active duty, I felt I was wronged by my Battalion Commanding Officer, so I researched the UCMJ and found this: I filed an Article 138 Investigation upon my Commander and had never seen such a "hot potato". I literally brought my Field Artillery Battalion to a standstill for 2 days while the Battalion Commander decided what to do with my complaint. After my Commander had met with all of his aides and consulted legal advice from the US Army Jag Corps, I was granted exactly what I had demanded in my request for redress. This was both a written and an Oral appology to me by my Battallion Commander, (LTC) in front of 500 fellow officers and soldiers within my battallion. The beauty is that the person filing a grievance MUST be given a final Disposition, so this will eventually get to the Secretary of the Branch of Servive in which it is brought. in my case, it would have been the Secretary of the Army.And all of this without harming or in any way having any detrimental effect upon the person complaining. So, I offer the complaint: As a soldier I do not feel that President Barack Obama has proven his eligibility to be President of the US and therefore can't serve as Commander in Chief. I feel as though any order given to me now would be invalid as he is a Usurper. He has never been properly vetted and thus has never shown a vault copy of his birth certificate. I feel and I believe there is enough evidence to show that President Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen of the US and therefore is not qualified to be President in accordance to Article II of the US Constitution. My request for redress is that President Barack Obama be made to prove his eligibility by showing a certified, forensic proven, long copy of his Vault Copy of his Borth Certificate. This must include as a minimum his place of birth, attending physicians name, parents names and any other pertinent data required by the average citizen necessary in obtaining a US Passport. Below is the Actual Article 138 UCMJ Redress of Grievances: Article 138 of the UCMJ is one of the few provisions of the code that permits the service members to go on the offensive.This provision gives you the right to file a complaint against your Commanding Officer for ANY ( emphasis added by me) grievance you may have including harrassment, violations of your rights, unfair treatment, ect... ( again for ANY reason, added by me). Normally, before filing the complaint, you should seek to resolve the issue with your Commander. If this is not appropriate or not successful, you may file the complaint with the officer exercising General Court-Martial Authority over your Commander. ( In other words, this complaint keeps going upward thru the chain of command till resolved). The Commander MUST9 emphasis added by me) investigate the complaint and forward the results to the office of the Secretary of your Branch of Service, ( ie, The Secretary of the Army, Secretary of the Navy, etc). The manual for Court-Martials provide guidance on filing an Article 138 Complaint. In my case Orly, I just hand wrote my grievance and handed it to my Batallion Commander. The legal system took care of the rest. I can't emphsis enough, the Soldier must get an answer in resolving this. It will definately make it to the Secretary of the service originated in. There I know they will take appropriate action with the Joint Chief of Staff or Congress to get a resolution, otherwise the person originating the action would be free to disobey any order given to him/her. I hope you may use this as a basis to get Obama to prove his eligibility. This doesn't require 2000 military in a class action suit. It would only require one. It gets aroung the standing issue and will not harm the career of the person initiating the request. Just another thought as I hope it will help you. morgan ward830-980-2760

Somebody Sabotaged this Blog- new blog is DefendOurFreedoms.US

A number of people were reporting that somebody has sabotaged this blog. In order to solve the problem we have built a new blog DefendOurFreedoms.US You will be able to read the new blog and post your comments there
Thank you
Orly

A few good men by EA Leo

Please post as article by EA LEO

A Call for a few Good Men & Women to Unite for Our Country

To find standing the Court need look no further than the Preamble of the Constitution of the United States, “We the people of the United States in order to form a more perfect Union… do ordain and establish this constitution for the United States of America." Thus, “we the people,” individually, are established as one party among many to a contract binding upon the executors of this contract, our Constitution.
Who then are the executors of this contract with the people?
"We the people" in this cause assert that anyone and everyone who takes Oath to be bound by our Constitution becomes a party to this agreement.
Foremost among the parties counterbalanced upon this executory contract is the President of the United States, the Chief Executive or Executor of the Constitutional Contract.
When is the President bound to this contract, our Constitution? "We the People" contend that he is bound immediately, upon the taking of the Oath. In the instant case, Barack Hussein Obama became bound to our Constitutional Contract on January 20, 2009.
As in the cause of Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. (1 Crunch) 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803), "We the People" seek fullfillment of our executory contract, our Constitution, by way of a Writ of Mandamus upon the executor by oath of said contract, the President of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama.
As succinctly stated by Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury, “If a persons duty is backed by law and not by political in nature, then he becomes subject of the law and is examinable by the court."
Thus, Barack Hussein Obama, having bound himself contractually by law to our Constitutional Contract is subject to the jurisdiction of the law, in this case the original jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court.
It is stated in United States v. Butterworth, 18 S. Ct. 441, 169 U.S. 600 at 602 (1898),

The office of a writ of mandamus is to compel the performance of a duty resting upon the person to whom the writ is sent. That duty may have originated in one way or in another. It may, as alleged in the present case, have arisen from the acceptance of an office which has imposed the duty upon its incumbent. But no matter out of what fact or relations the duty has grown, what the law requires, and what it seeks to enforce by a writ of mandamus, is the personal obligation of the individual to whom it addresses the writ.”

Following much good faith research regarding the issue of original jurisdiction in the Supreme Court of the United States, "We the People" have found no cases in the history of jurisprudence of the United States of America wherein a Defendant disputed the Constitutional fact that the Supreme Court of the United States has original jurisdiction over “all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls” as plainly stated in the Constitution of the United States, Article III, Section 2.
That being the case, "We the People" respectfully request that the Barack Hussein Obama stipulate to the fact that the Supreme Court of the United States has original jurisdiction over all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; or, in the alternative, that Barack Hussein Obama show good cause why the Supreme Court of the United States shall not have original jurisdiction over our cause.

My interview on True News was blocked by Microsoft Internet Explorer- and I thought Bill Gates was a decent guy

Hi Orly

During your interview with Marshall Washburn today, Microsoft Internet Explorer did not allow access to your blog page covering the interview
"http://drorly.blogspot.com/2009/02/interview-today-1-est.html"

Please see attached file "ERROR TO TAITZ WEBPAGE 090202.doc" that captured screenshots to document this event.

Michael

cc:
news@trunews.com
marshall@trunews.com


Marshall Washburn
TRUNEWS
Production Manager
www.Trunews.com
Office: 1.561.792.6777
Cell: 1.423.316.9234
Mailing:
P.O. Box 212937
West Palm Beach, FL 33421

Re alex Jones show from reader Netty

Alex Jones’ documentary, Endgame, is a MUST WATCH to learn how our elected officials, unable to represent our interests in the current shadow government, are complicit in having created indentured servants of all US citizens with our own money! Please pass on to those you care about.



http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1070329053600562261 (may need to cut and paste)



Best Regards,

Do you want to wronffully end up in a concentration camp on US soil?

Flag this messageBill creates detention camps in U.S. for 'emergencies' to Detain Law-Abiding U.S. CitizensMonday, February 2, 2009 12:02 PM
From: This sender is DomainKeys verified "Phillip Laird" Add sender to Contacts To: lairdpg@yahoo.com

Are you a law abiding American? You want to wrongfully end up in a concentration camp on U.S. soil?

If you are like me, you want to remain free in a free America. America is about to face a big dilemma if we don't united to stop bills like the crazy one below. You might think it has no chance, but if you don't do anything, if you don't stand up and be heard, this bill could pass! While Americans are forced to pay taxes, Obama is filling his cabinet with thugs that didn't pay their taxes but will oversee the agencies that enforce tax collection. On top of that Hillary Clinton and stated her satisfaction that the Law of the Sea Treaty is a good thing. Obama supports replacing our troops with the United Nations troops. Make that UN troops and UN police. Don't for one minute think that a police state is a good idea! Don't give up your freedom to those thugs in Washington, D.C. Please read the story below and then go read the official House of Representatives bill (HR 645) introduced by: Congressman Representative Alcee L. Hastings, D. Florida Phone: 1-202-225-1313FAX: 1-202-225-1171http://www.alceehastings.house.govDistrict Offices:Ft. Lauderdale: 1-954-733-2800West Palm Beach: 1-561-684-0565 Alcee Hastings is a super-liberal Progressive Democrat (Socialist) that has been in office for his 8th term. It is time to run him out of office! H.R. 645, which seeks to allocate $360 million for developing the emergency centers, has been referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and to the Committee on Armed Services. I am asking that each of you call this nut-job's office, FAX him, and email him and demand that he withdraw the bill. If you don't this thing may gain traction really fast. Call your senators and congressmen also and complain about Hastings and his dumb proposed legislation! If anything, America needs detention facilities for 545 congressmen and senators. I've never seen a U.S. Congress so corrupt and arrogant! PLEASE EMAIL THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW. IF YOU KNOW FOLKS WITHOUT EMAIL ADDRESSES, PLEASE CALL THEM AND GIVE THEM THE DETAILS! WE SHOULD STOP THIS BILL AS A SHOW OF FREEDOM. LIFE WITH BIG BROTHER
Bill creates detention camps in U.S. for 'emergencies'
Sweeping, undefined purpose raises worries about military police state
http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=87757

Can someone help me get in touch with a writer of Huffington post Jason Linkins, e-mail dr_taitz@yahoo.com

I need to contact Rod Blagojevich, can someone help get in contact with him call 949-683-5411

Citizen's grand juries

We need volunteers to coordinate and form citizen's grand juries all over the country. Evidence of Barry Soetoro-Barack Obama's ineligibility/illegitimacy for presidency will be presented to those Citizen's Grand Juries for their decision on indictment or presentment. If you want to coordinate National or state or local effort in this matter, please e-mail me at dr_taitz@yahoo.com

Kanye Blagojevich Obama?

Odd reference in January 8, 2009's Huffington Post. In Jason Linkins' write up of From 'Barry' To 'Barack': Occidental College Video Has The Story

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/08/from-barry-to-barack-occi_n_156418.html?page=4

This photo is captioned:

Here's the President-Elect, during a period of time when he was known as "Kanye Blagojevich Obama." [Not pictured: the Weather Underground.]



What does that mean? Is it a reference to Obama knowing Kenye West and Rod Blagojevich during the 80s? Is it implying that Kenye West and Rod Blagojevich were also Weather Underground? Was this yet another alias Obama had?

Obama is now an Indian

I just got an obscure article by Sunlen Miller of ABC. According to this article last year Obama was adopted by an Indian couple from a Crow tribe. It gives him two advantages:
1. US citizenship
2.now he and his family can legally own casinos and other gambling operations
I would like to point out, that this trick will not cure his lack of Natural Born Citizen status . At birth he was a British citizen, based on his father's citizenship and he is illegitimate for Presidency of the United States, so he can build a csino on Crow territory, that's fine with me, but he cannot gamble with the future of this country, with the future of my and your children.
Orly

Interview today 1 EST

Dear Dr. Taitz,

I just wanted to send out this reminder that we were scheduled for an interview today at 1 EST. We appreciate you taking the time today to discuss the latest news concerning Obama’s fraudulent birth status and his secretive meeting with the Supreme Court. I will call you at 1-949-683-5411. Thanks Orly !



Marshall Washburn

TRUNEWS

Production Manager

www.Trunews.com


Office: 1.561.792.6777
Cell: 1.423.316.9234


Mailing:

P.O. Box 212937

West Palm Beach, FL 33421



UPS, FedEx, DHL Deliveries:
10130 Northlake Blvd.
Ste. 214 - 342
West Palm Beach , FL 33412

Bill creates detention camps in US, from WorldNetDailey

How quickly can you say Hile Hitler, Zig Hile???
Read the article below. If this doesn't make your blood boil and doesn't urge you to fight these communist Nazi thugs and hoodlums that took over our government, then you are either one of them or you are already dead.
Orly

LIFE WITH BIG BROTHER
Bill creates detention camps in U.S. for 'emergencies'
Sweeping, undefined purpose raises worries about military police state

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: February 01, 2009
7:19 pm Eastern


By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2009 WorldNetDaily



Rep. Alcee L. Hastings, D-Fla.

Rep. Alcee L. Hastings, D-Fla., has introduced to the House of Representatives a new bill, H.R. 645, calling for the secretary of homeland security to establish no fewer than six national emergency centers for corralling civilians on military installations.

The proposed bill, which has received little mainstream media attention, appears designed to create the type of detention center that those concerned about use of the military in domestic affairs fear could be used as concentration camps for political dissidents, such as occurred in Nazi Germany.

Heed the warning of a former Hitler Youth who sees America on the same path as pre-Nazi Germany in "Defeating the Totalitarian Lie" from WND Books!

The bill also appears to expand the president's emergency power, much as the executive order signed by President Bush on May 9, 2007, that, as WND reported, gave the president the authority to declare an emergency and take over the direction of all federal, state, local, territorial and tribal governments without even consulting Congress.

As WND also reported, DHS has awarded a $385 million contract to Houston-based KBR, Halliburton's former engineering and construction subsidiary, to build temporary detention centers on an "as-needed" basis in national emergency situations.

(Story continues below)




According to the text of the proposed bill, the purpose of the National Emergency Centers is "to provide temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance to individuals and families dislocated due to an emergency or major disaster."

Three additional purposes are specified in the text of the proposed legislation:

To provide centralized locations for the purposes of training and ensuring the coordination of federal, state and local first responders;

To provide centralized locations to improve the coordination of preparedness, response and recovery efforts of government, private, not-for-profit entities and faith-based organizations;

To meet other appropriate needs, as defined by the secretary of homeland security.
The broad specifications of the bill's language, however, contribute to concern that the "national emergency" purpose could be utilized by the secretary of homeland security to include any kind of situation the government wants to contain or otherwise control.

Rep. Hastings created controversy during the 2008 presidential campaign with his provocative comments concerning Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin.

"If Sarah Palin isn't enough of a reason for you to get over whatever your problem is with Barack Obama, then you damn well had better pay attention," Hastings said, as reported by ABC News. "Anybody toting guns and stripping moose don't care too much about what they do with Jews and blacks. So, you just think this through."

H.R. 645, which seeks to allocate $360 million for developing the emergency centers, has been referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and to the Committee on Armed Services.

Open Letter to Senator Warren from Lt.Col. Dr. Earl-Graeff

Chicago Tribune Ad For Obama Records Extended Entries: Open Letter to Senator Warren from Lt.Col. Dr. Earl-Graeff: "Date: 1 Feb 2009,

Dear Senator Warren,

I am in receipt of your letter of 26 Jan 2009. While I thank you for taking the time to respond I can't express in words my disappointment in your response. I have given much thought to this issue and take offense in so much as you would apparently
dismiss my concerns without a thorough investigation into the validity of my questions. So it is that I am again compelled to write to you and ask your re-consideration. Please do not dismiss prima fasciae, as if this has already been addressed, but read what I have to say." Read more.

Formal Request to Senator Cantwell

Download MS Doc Here


1 February 2009 Sunday

U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell, - (D - WA)
Washington, D.C. Office
511 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
202-224-3441
202-228-0514 - FAX
via Fax: 202-228-0514



Re: U.S. Constitution; FIRST CONGRESS; THIRD CONGRESS


Dear Senator Cantwell:


Your representation as a U.S. Senator is formally requested within this letter. Due to a rapidly growing concern among voters in the State of Washington there appears to be a developing crisis requiring your membership in the U.S. Congress to fully cooperate with the voters and address four questions below.

In the official copies of the THIRD U.S. Congress (1795) are margin notes that state "Former act repealed. 1790. ch. 3." referencing the FIRST U.S. Congress (1790).

The actual text of the THIRD CONGRESS in 1795 states,
"...children of citizens [plural, i.e. two parents] of the United States...shall be considered citizens of the United States; Provided That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons, whose fathers have never been resident in the United States..." [THIRD CONGRESS Sess. II. Ch.21. 1795, Approved January 29, 1795, pp. 414-415] [Document margin note: "How children shall obtain citizenship through their parents" Document margin note: Former Act repealed 1790 ch.3] (Attachment A)

The actual text of the FIRST CONGRESS in 1790 states,
"...children of citizens [plural, i.e. two parents] of the United States...shall be considered as natural born citizens of the United States; Provided That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons, whose fathers have never been resident in the United States..." [[FIRST CONGRESS Sess. II Ch.4 1790, Approved March 26, 1790, pp. 103-104] [Document margin note: Their children residing here, deemed citizens. Document margin note: Also, children of citizens born beyond sea, & c. Exceptions.] (Attachment B)

The actual text of the Constitution from the Continental Congress and the Constitutional Convention, 1774-1789, and subsequent official printings, of the Constitution of the United States of American: Article II Section 1 Clause 5 states,
“No person, except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States
at the time of the adoption of this Constitution,
shall be eligible to the office of President…” (Attachment C)


The actual text in a January 26, 2009 letter issued by United States Senator, Mark R. Warner cites

“…the Immigration and Nationality Act (P.L. 82-414) …states that
‘…A person born...after April 30, 1900 is a CITIZEN (emphasis added)
of the United States at birth....’" (Attachment D)


WE, voters in the State of Washington, witness to these four documents cited, i.e.:
The actual text of the THIRD CONGRESS in 1795
The actual text of the FIRST CONGRESS in 1790
The actual text of the Constitution from the Continental Congress and the Constitutional Convention, 1774-1789

The actual text in a January 26, 2009 letter issued by United States Senator, Mark R. Warner
and we also witness the apparent denial in the current United States Congress to address the phrase “natural born citizen.”


THEREFORE, WE formally request a comprehensive answer from your position as Senator to the following four questions:

ONE

As a U.S. Senator, how did you define the term “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” versus “CITIZENS” in regard to the 2008 U.S. Presidential election; as so stated in the U.S. Constitution, the FIRST and the THIRD Congress of the United States?

TWO

Are children of citizens (plural) of the United States granted citizenship if one parent is not a citizen of the United States; as the phrase “…children of citizens of the United States…” is so stated in FIRST and THIRD Congress of the United States?

THREE

To be a “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” of the United States is a person required to be a child of “citizens (plural) of the United States” as the phrase “natural born citizen” is so stated in the U.S. Constitution, and the FIRST Congress of the United States?

FOUR

On behalf of voters in the State of Washington, will you provide us with comprehensive clarification from United States Senator Mark R. Warner regarding the legal difference between the legal term/phrases “CITIZEN of the United States” and “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN of the United States?”

In advance, I thank you for your prompt and comprehensive response to these four questions.


Very truly yours,



Michael Angelus


Attachments:

A: Image of original document THIRD CONGRESS Sess. II. Ch.21, 1795, p. 415
B: Image of original document FIRST CONGRESS Sess. II. Ch.3, 1790, p. 104
C: Image of original document Constitution from the Continental Congress and the Constitutional Convention, 1774-1789:
D: United States Senator Mark Warner (Virginia) January 26, 2009 letter to Dr. David Earl-Graef