tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1958992492864100930.post2585928569589187307..comments2023-10-31T05:19:53.062-07:00Comments on A Natural Born Citizen...Orly?: Motion for Subpoenes for Obama BC issued in WA state, case to be heard by the full court. BO announces vacation in HIOrly Taitz, DDS Esq.http://www.blogger.com/profile/09032528086295633238noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1958992492864100930.post-29282811496317540012008-12-19T09:03:00.000-08:002008-12-19T09:03:00.000-08:00BHO not only voted for SR511, he was a co-sponsor....BHO not only voted for SR511, he was a co-sponsor. If BHO is indeed a constitutional lawyer, he surely knows he is inelgible to serve as POTUS. SR511 was an attempt to provide him cover should his eligibility be questioned. I do not believe for a minute that his motive was anything but self-serving interest. <BR/>http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sr511/textAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1958992492864100930.post-28442312000577818852008-12-18T22:07:00.000-08:002008-12-18T22:07:00.000-08:00Hi ,Have you read the Senate Resolution 511 passed...Hi ,<BR/><BR/>Have you read the Senate Resolution 511 passed on 10 April 2008 as the sense of the Senate on what "natural born citizen" meant to them in April 2008. It was brought to the Senate because of McCain's own issues of being born on a military base hospital in Panama, per his own long form birth certificate, which he provided the Senate as proof that he was born on a military base to two U.S. citizens, and not in a civilian Panama hospital as some alleged.<BR/><BR/>While the resolution is non-binding, it is very, very telling of the Senate's understanding of what natural born citizenship is in at least one respect, it clearly states in that resolution at several places that it is understood that the person who is to be considered a "natural born citizen" must be born of parents (plural) who were citizens of the U.S. ... at several places ii refers to parents and American citizens in the plural, i.e., both. It always uses the plural. That is the key.<BR/><BR/>http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200804/041008c.html<BR/><BR/>Read it yourself. What is very interesting about this resolution is that Obama voted for it, I am told. Thus Obama knew the spirit and intent and "sense" of the Senate, and that of the Secretary of Homeland Security who thus oversees the Immigration Department and knows that law and was a Judge at one time, who himself testified at the discussion of this resolution, that both parents must be American citizens for the child to be considered a "natural born citizen".<BR/><BR/>While I think the original intent of the framers was even more restrictive and they intended it to mean that the child had to be born on U.S. soil too, plus have both parents be citizens, at least this resolution has the "key indisputable fact" in it, in a Senate resolutions, that both parents must be American citizens to be considered "natural born citizen". I think that is a key and essential part of even modern thought of natural law and on who is a natural born citizen, i.e., that both parents must be a citizen of the U.S. Also we have the statement of the Secretary of Homeland Security stating that too, that both parents must be citizens, in the Congressional Record.<BR/><BR/>And we absolutely know that Obama's father was NEVER a U.S. citizen and Obama has acknowledged that many times. Thus on that point alone, Obama is not a "natural born citizen" of the USA. You and I know it, and it appears the Senate understands this too in their "sense of the Senate" resolution on this. But the Senate so far has refused to confront Obama about it. And Obama never of course asked the Senate to rule on his natural born citizenship status. Because, imo, he already knew the answer back in April ... he's not qualified. He is not a natural born citizen because his father was never a U.S. citizen.<BR/><BR/>THEREFORE, ... if you write, email, or FAX a U.S. Senator about Obama's citizenship status point out what their own "sense of the Senate" Senate Resolution 511 said about "natural born citizen" meaning in April 2008 of this year! Tell them to read their own words. The Resolution was adopted unanimously. But also suggest they read section 212 of the "Law of Nations" published in 1758, too, and framer John Jay's letter to George Washington (original in the Library of Congress), just for extra measure. :-)<BR/><BR/>Gee, isn't it amazing that the NY Times did not write an article challenging Obama's "natural born citizenship" status. :-)<BR/><BR/>Mountain Publius Goat<BR/>http://obamacitizenshipfacts.wordpress.comAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1958992492864100930.post-51306628356936752952008-12-18T21:21:00.000-08:002008-12-18T21:21:00.000-08:00They should have tried to supeona his passport, tr...They should have tried to supeona his passport, travel and school records too, as that could show allegiance to another country...www.ObamaNotQualified.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01269008037481862986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1958992492864100930.post-58467710279164159982008-12-18T20:17:00.000-08:002008-12-18T20:17:00.000-08:00EASY WAY TO MAKE SURE OBAMA NEVER GETS INAUGURATED...EASY WAY TO MAKE SURE OBAMA NEVER GETS INAUGURATED (READ CAREFULLY):–<BR/><BR/>Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II “natural born citizen” based on the Kenyan/British citizenship of Barack Obama’s father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a “citizen” born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States” as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II “natural born citizen”.Tedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04011502155494655727noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1958992492864100930.post-14459238730865657242008-12-18T17:44:00.000-08:002008-12-18T17:44:00.000-08:00It is all so simple. Just show proof of his birth ...It is all so simple. Just show proof of his birth and be done with it but it seems we are going to play a game and there should have been a copy of this birth record with the papers he filed when he decided to run for President right?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1958992492864100930.post-88662190462707464922008-12-18T12:56:00.000-08:002008-12-18T12:56:00.000-08:00please install a widget called FEEDJIT so you can ...please install a widget called FEEDJIT so you can see who is visiting your blog. It is a "live" traffic feed. No one can defeat it. Even if someone uses a proxy, it should show it. This will most likely show that "they" are watching you. Why else would he choose Hawaii??<BR/><BR/>http://feedjit.com/join/<BR/><BR/>I am totally supporting you in every way I can. Concerned citizenAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1958992492864100930.post-19947195477127277762008-12-18T12:28:00.000-08:002008-12-18T12:28:00.000-08:00Actually, the BO's trip to Hawaii was announced De...Actually, the BO's trip to Hawaii was announced Dec 1, after the flood of cases at the SCOTUS and around the same time Steve initially files his Washington case. <BR/><BR/>Better keep tabs on Barack this time while he's there to see if he swings by the Office of Vital Statistics to sign paperwork or visits the main Courthouse in Hawaii...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1958992492864100930.post-75077892070267844352008-12-18T12:05:00.000-08:002008-12-18T12:05:00.000-08:00Why Hawaii again? Did he have his grandmother "of...Why Hawaii again? Did he have his grandmother "off-ed"? Does he need to cover his tracks? Does he need to bribe someone to change his birth certificate?<BR/><BR/>Why, of ALL the places in the world, would he go to Hawaii now??!?!?! And he couldn't go somewhere else? <BR/><BR/>Again, why didn't he go to his grandmother's funeral?The Law of Attraction Grouphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13746058088664887807noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1958992492864100930.post-47543202353669401112008-12-18T11:25:00.000-08:002008-12-18T11:25:00.000-08:00Omposter has a very strange record of Hawaiian vac...Omposter has a very strange record of Hawaiian vacations and visits. On his last visit, the only surviving relative who could attest to his Hawaiian birthplace had, he said, suffered a broken hip, not reported or recorded elsewhere, including at any hospital, and she died almost immediately thereafter, of cancer, also untreated and unreported by any medical facility in Hawaii. And a number of other sources of information sealed up and/or vanished. <BR/><BR/>So Omposter's way of relaxing seems to be to allay his anxieties by blocking or destroying access to information about his past or intentions. It just makes him feel so much better and more secure!Brian Hhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17895289104798325252noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1958992492864100930.post-89456905465231008262008-12-18T11:14:00.000-08:002008-12-18T11:14:00.000-08:00OMFG, SO FUNNY!!!wait... why?OMFG, SO FUNNY!!!<BR/><BR/>wait... why?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1958992492864100930.post-84243026344424218612008-12-18T09:39:00.000-08:002008-12-18T09:39:00.000-08:00BHO announcd his vacation in Hawaii, back in early...BHO announcd his vacation in Hawaii, back in early Nov.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1958992492864100930.post-18863235330131049842008-12-18T09:26:00.000-08:002008-12-18T09:26:00.000-08:00As the good Doctor Taitz knows, filing is easy. T...As the good Doctor Taitz knows, filing is easy. The trick is getting a judge to see it your way.<BR/><BR/>And good luck with that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com